Skip to main content

Distributed Decision Making by Categorically-Thinking Agents

  • Chapter
Decision Making and Imperfection

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 474))

Abstract

Human decision makers think categorically when facing a great variety of objects due to their limited information processing capacities. The categorical thinking by Bayesian decision makers is modeled as classifying objects into a small number of categories with respect to their prior probabilities. The classification follows a quantization rule for the prior probabilities. The categorical thinking enables decision makers to handle infinitely many objects but simultaneously causes them to lose precision of prior probabilities and, consequently, of decisions. This chapter considers group decision making by imperfect agents that only knowquantized prior probabilities for use in Bayesian likelihood ratio tests. Global decisions are made by information fusion of local decisions, but information sharing among agents before local decision making is forbidden. The quantization rule of the agents is investigated so as to achieve the minimum mean Bayes risk; optimal quantizers are designed by a novel extension to the Lloyd-Max algorithm. It is proven that agents using identical quantizers are not optimal. Thus diversity in the individual agents’ quantizers leads to optimal performance. In addition, for comparison, it is shown how much their performance gets better when information sharing and collaboration among agents before local decision making is allowed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brase, G.L., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J.: Individuation, counting, and statistical inference: the role of frequency and whole-object representations in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127(1), 3–21 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chugh, D.: Societal and managerial implications of implicit social cognition: Why milliseconds matter. Social Justice Research 17(2), 203–222 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Kurzban, R.: Perceptions of race. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(4), 173–179 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. David, H.A., Nagaraja, H.N.: Order Statistics, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dow, J.: Search decisions with limited memory. Review of Economic Studies 58(1), 1–14 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fryer, R., Jackson, M.O.: A categorical model of cognition and biased decision making. The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gersho, A., Gray, R.M.: Vector Quantization and Signal Compression. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1992)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Glanzer, M., Hilford, A., Maloney, L.T.: Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: Three implied regularities. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16(3), 431–455 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Macrae, C.N., Bodenhausen, G.V.: Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology 51, 93–120 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, G.A.: The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2), 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Piccionea, M., Rubinstein, A.: On the interpretation of decision problems with imperfect recall. Games and Economic Behavior 20(1), 3–24 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Radner, R.: Team decision problems. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 33(3), 857–881 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Radner, R.: Costly and bounded rationality in individual and team decision-making. In: Dosi, G., Teece, D.J., Chytry, J. (eds.) Understanding Industrial and Corporate Change, pp. 3–35. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rhim, J.B., Varshney, L.R., Goyal, V.K.: Quantization of prior probabilities for collaborative distributed hypothesis testing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rhim, J.B., Varshney, L.R., Goyal, V.K.: Collaboration in distributed hypothesis testing with quantized prior probabilities. In: Proc. IEEE Data Compression Conf., Snowbird, UT, pp. 303–312 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rhim, J.B., Varshney, L.R., Goyal, V.K.: Conflict in distributed hypothesis testing with quantized prior probabilities. In: Proc. IEEE Data Compression Conf., Snowbird, UT, pp. 313–322 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Swets, J.A., Tanner Jr., W.P., Birdsall, T.G.: Decision process in perception. Psychological Review 68(5), 301–340 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van Trees, H.L.: Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Part I. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Varshney, K.R., Varshney, L.R.: Quantization of prior probabilities for hypothesis testing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 56(10), 4553–4562 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Varshney, K.R., Varshney, L.R.: Multilevel minimax hypothesis testing. In: Proc. IEEE/SP Workshop Stat., Nice, France, pp. 109–112 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Varshney, L.R., Rhim, J.B., Varshney, K.R., Goyal, V.K.: Categorical decision making by people, committees, and crowds. In: Proc. Information Theory and Applications Workshop, La Jolla, CA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilson, A.: Bounded memory and biases in information processing. NajEcon Working Paper Reviews (2003), http://www.najecon.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joong Bum Rhim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rhim, J.B., Varshney, L.R., Goyal, V.K. (2013). Distributed Decision Making by Categorically-Thinking Agents. In: Guy, T., Karny, M., Wolpert, D. (eds) Decision Making and Imperfection. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 474. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36406-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36406-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36405-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36406-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics