Skip to main content

Mashups for the Web of Things

  • Chapter
Semantic Mashups

Abstract

The Web of Things (WoT) together with mashup-like applications is gaining popularity with the development of the Internet towards a network of interconnected objects, ranging from cars and transportation cargos to electrical appliances. In this chapter we provide a brief architectural overview of technologies which can be used in WoT mashups with emphasis on artificial intelligence technologies such as conceptualization and stream processing. We also look at data sources and existing WoT mashups. In the last part of the chapter we discuss the architecture and implementation of Videk, a prototype mashup for environmental intelligence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.opengeospatial.org/ogc/markets_tehcnologies/swe.

  2. 2.

    http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sensorml.

  3. 3.

    http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/om.

  4. 4.

    http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/.

  5. 5.

    http://www.geonames.org/.

  6. 6.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/.

  7. 7.

    http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/.

  8. 8.

    http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sos.

  9. 9.

    http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sps.

  10. 10.

    http://www.ogcnetwork.net/SAS.

  11. 11.

    http://www.envision-project.eu/ (Scenarios).

  12. 12.

    http://sdf.ndbc.noaa.gov/sos/.

  13. 13.

    http://www.necodp.org/.

  14. 14.

    https://cosm.com/ (former Pachube).

  15. 15.

    http://www.sensorpedia.com/.

  16. 16.

    http://www.nimbits.com/.

  17. 17.

    http://open.sen.se/.

  18. 18.

    http://evrythng.com/.

  19. 19.

    http://sensors.ijs.si/.

  20. 20.

    http://linkeddata.org.

  21. 21.

    http://sensormasher.deri.org/.

  22. 22.

    http://www.sensorpedia.com.

  23. 23.

    http://atom.research.microsoft.com/sensewebv3/sensormap/.

  24. 24.

    http://linkeddata.org/.

  25. 25.

    http://sensors.ijs.si/sl/api/index.html.

  26. 26.

    http://jquery.com.

  27. 27.

    http://sensors.ijs.si.

  28. 28.

    http://research.cyc.com/.

References

  1. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Boley H, Tabet S, Wagner G (2001) Design rationale of RuleML: a markup language for semantic web rules. In: Proceedings of the first semantic web working symposium, SWWS’01, Stanford University, July 30–August 1, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chandola V et al. (2009) Anomaly detection: a survey. ACM Comput Surv 41(3):15. doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Compton M et al (2009) A survey of the semantic specification of sensors. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on semantic sensor networks, October 2009

    Google Scholar 

  5. Compton M et al. (2012) The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. J Web Semant. doi:10.1016/j.websem.2012.05.003

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cugola G, Margara A (2012) Processing flows of information: from data stream to complex event processing. ACM Comput Surv 44(3):15. doi:10.1145/2187671.2187677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Ipina DL et al (2007) A context-aware mobile mashup for ubiquitous web. In: Proceedings of IET international conference on intelligent environments, University of Ulm, Ulm, Sept 24–25, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  8. Etzion O, Nibblet P (2011) Event processing in action. Manning Publications, Shelter Island

    Google Scholar 

  9. Falutsos C, Ranganathan M, Manolopoulos Y (1994) Fast subsequence matching in time-series databases. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGMOID, Minneapolis, May 25–27, pp 419–429

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fenn J, LeHong H (2011) Hype cycle for emerging technologies. Gartner Inc, ID number: G00215650

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fortuna B (2011) Semi-automatic ontology construction: doctoral dissertation (Polavtomatska gradnja ontologij: doktorska disertacija), Ljubljana, October 2011

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fortuna C, Grobelnik M (2011) The web of things. In: World Wide Web conference. http://sensorlab.ijs.si/files/publications/2011-03-29-Fortuna_Grobelnik_Web_of_Things_Tutorial_WWW.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2012

  13. Gaber MM, Zaslavsky A, Kirshnaswamy S (2005) Mining data streams: a review. SIGMOD Rec 34:18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gama J (2010) Knowledge discovery from data streams. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Guinard D (2011) A web of things application architecture—integrating the real-world into the web. PhD thesis No 19891, ETH Zurich, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hanson JJ (2009) Mashups—strategies for modern enterprises. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kaupinen T, Benedikt G, de Espindola MG (2012) Sharing and analyzing remote sensing observation data for linked science. In: ESWC 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Le Phuoc D, Hauswirth M (2009) Linked open data in sensor data mashups. In: Kerry Taylor DD (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on semantic sensor networks (SSN09), in conjunction with ISWC 2009, vol 522. CEUR, CSIRO, Canberra, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moraru A, Kenda K, Fortuna B, Bradesko L, Skrajnc M, Mladenic D, Fortuna C (2012) Sup-porting rule generation and validation on environmental data in EnStreaM. In: ESWC 2012

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nath S et al. (2007) SensorMap for wide-area sensor webs. IEEE Comput 40(7):90–93. doi:10.1109/MC.2007.250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reichardt M (2003) The sensor web’s point of beginning. http://spectroscopyonline.findanalytichem.com/spectroscopy/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=52681&sk=&date=&pageID=2. Accessed 11 Jan 2011

  22. Sanchez L et al (2011) SmartSantander: the meeting point between future internet research and experimentation and the smart cities. In: IST future networks & mobile summit, Warsaw

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sheth A, Henson C, Sahoo SS (2008) Semantic sensor web. IEEE Internet Comput 12(4):78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Siegele L (2010) It’s a smart world. The Economist http://www.economist.com/node/17388368. Accessed 30 Sep 2010

  25. Simonis I (2008) OGC® sensor web enablement architecture. Open Geospatial Consortium. http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=29405. Accessed 2 Mar 2012

  26. Smolnikar M, Platise U (2010) Versatile sensor node—a platform for the sensor as a service concept. In: Proceedings of prosense WSN and SME workshop: wireless sensor networks (WSN) and small medium enterprises (SME), Ljubljana, May 20, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stonebroker M, Çetintemel U, Zdonik S (2006) The eight rules of real-time stream processing. SIGMOID Rec 34:42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tamayo A et al. (2011) Empirical study of sensor observation services server instances. In: Advancing geoinformation science for a changing world. Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartography, pp 185–210

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Slovenian Research Agency through the program P2-0016 and project J2-4197, the competence center KC OPCOMM, and the ICT Programme of the EC under PASCAL2 (ICT-NoE-216886), ENVISION (ICT-2009-249120) and PlanetData (ICT-NoE-257641). The authors are also grateful to Envigence d.o.o. for the collaboration on Slovenian sensor deployment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klemen Kenda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kenda, K., Fortuna, C., Moraru, A., Mladenić, D., Fortuna, B., Grobelnik, M. (2013). Mashups for the Web of Things. In: Endres-Niggemeyer, B. (eds) Semantic Mashups. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36403-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36403-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36402-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36403-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics