Skip to main content

A Methodology for Processing Raw LiDAR Data to Support Urban Flood Modelling Framework: Case Study—Kuala Lumpur Malaysia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

High quality representation of the topographic and the correct representation of significant urban features would be a fundamental foundation to a better urban flood model. Without such a representation, simulation of flood behaviours would be less successful as the flow patterns were completely dependent on ground levels and the shape of the features. Typically, such data can be obtained via Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) surveys. The process of turning raw LiDAR data into a useful Digital Terrain Model (DTM) involves careful processing and application of thinning, filtering and interpolation algorithms. Filtering is a process of automatic detection and interpretation of bare earth and objects from the point cloud of LiDAR data, which results in the generation of a DTM. To date, many filtering algorithms have been developed, and in a more general sense, many of them have become standard industry practice. However, when it comes to the use of a DTM for urban flood modelling applications, these algorithms cannot be always considered suitable. Depending on the terrain characteristics, they can even lead to misleading results and degrade the predictive capability of the modelling technique. This is largely due to the fact that urban environments often contain a variety of features (or objects) such as buildings, elevated roads, bridges, curbs and others which have the ability to store or divert flows during flood events. As these objects dominate urban surfaces, appropriate filtering methods need to be applied in order to identify such objects and to represent them correctly within a DTM so that the DTM can be used more safely in modelling applications. The work described in this chapter concerns improvements of a LiDAR filtering algorithm. The key characteristics of this improved algorithm are: ability to recover curbs and the use of appropriated roughness coefficient of Manning’s value to represent close-to-earth vegetation (e.g. grass and small bush). The results of the improved algorithm were demonstrated using Kuala Lumpur (Malaysia) as a case study. Improvement, in terms of a difference in flood depths and flood flows were observed between the hydraulics models built from several available filtering algorithms and the improved algorithm (MPMA). The overall results suggest that the improvement made in MPMA can lead to some difference in model results, which may in some cases be significant with a tendency towards incorrect flood flow by those models in which such features are not properly represented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdullah AF, Vojinovic Z, Price RK, Aziz NAA (2011a) A methodology for processing raw LiDAR data to support urban flood modelling framework. J Hydroinformatics 14(1):75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah AF, Vojinovic Z, Price RK, Aziz NAA (2011b) Improved methodology for processing raw LiDAR data to support urban flood modelling—accounting for elevated roads and bridges. J Hydroinformatics 14(2):253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen AS, Hsu MH, Teng WH, Huang CJ, Yeh SH, Lien WY (2005) Establishing the database of inundation potential in Taiwan. Nat Hazards 37(1–2):107–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q (2007) Airborne LiDAR data processing and information extraction. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 73:109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • DHI Water and Environment (M) Sdn. Bhd. (2004) Klang river basin environment improvement and flood mitigation project (storm water management and road tunnel—smart), Final report to Government of Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Djordjevic S, Prodanovic D, Maksimovic C, Ivetic M, Savic DA (2005) SIPSON—simulation of interaction between pipe flow and surface overland flow in networks. Water Sci Technol 52(5):275–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune S (1985) A sweepline algorithm for voronoi diagrams. Algorithmica 2(2):153–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood M (2001) Laser altimetry—from science to commercial lidar mapping. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 67(1209–11):1213–1217

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Navarro P, Brufau P (2006) Numerical methods for the shallow water equations: 2D approach. In: Knight DW, Shamseldin AY (eds) River basin modeling for flood risk mitigation. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 409–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Haile AT, Rientjes TH (2005) Effects of LiDAR DTM resolution in flood modelling: a model sensitivity study for the city of Tegucigalpa, Honduras. ISPRS workshop ‘laser scanning 2005’, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter NM, Bates PD, Horritt MS, Wilson MD (2007) Simplified spatially-distributed models for predicting flood inundation: a review. Geomorphology 90:208–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter NM, Bates PD, Neelz S, Pender G, Villanueva I, Wright NG, Liang D, Falconer RA, Lin B, Walle S, Crossley AJ, Mason DC (2008) Benchmarking 2D hydraulicmodels for urban flooding. Wat Manage 161(1):13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiry SN, Sen D, Bates PD (2010) A coupled 1D-quasi 2D flood inundation model with unstructured grids. J Hydraul Eng 136(8):493–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens M (2007) Airborne lidar sensors. GIM Int 21(2):0

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark O, Weesakul S, Apirumanekul C, Aroonnet SB, Djordjevic S (2004) Potential and limitations of 1D modelling urban flooding. J Hydrol 299(3–4):284–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman E (2007) Surface-sewer coupling and detailed elevation models for accurate urban drainage modelling. In: Proceedings Cost Session Aquaterra Conference 2007, Special aspects of urban flood managements, pp 183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Price RK, Vojinovic Z (2011) Urban hydroinformatics: data, model and decision support for integrated urban water management. IWA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Romano ME (2004) Innovation in LiDAR processing technology. Photogram Eng Remote Sens 70:1202–1206

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangster C (2002) Validating LiDAR—evaluating LiDAR accuracy using GPS. Applied Geomatics Research Group, Centre of Geographic Science, Lawrence town, Nova Scotia

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt TG, Thomas M, Ettrich N (2004) Analysis and modelling of flooding in urban drainage systems. J Hydrol 299:300–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt TG, Schilling W, Sægrov S, Nieschulz KP (2002) Flood risk management for urban drainage systems by simulation and optimisation. In: 9th ICUD conference, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Vojinovic Z, Tutulic D (2009) On the use of 1D and coupled 1D–2D modelling approaches for assessment of flood damages in urban areas. Urban Wat J 6(3):183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vojinovic Z, Seyoum SD, Mwalwaka JM, Price R (2011) Effects of model schematisation, geometry and parameter values on urban flood modelling. Water Sci, Technol 63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Fikri Abdullah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abdullah, A.F., Vojinovic, Z., Abdul Rahman, A. (2013). A Methodology for Processing Raw LiDAR Data to Support Urban Flood Modelling Framework: Case Study—Kuala Lumpur Malaysia. In: Abdul Rahman, A., Boguslawski, P., Gold, C., Said, M. (eds) Developments in Multidimensional Spatial Data Models. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36379-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics