Skip to main content

Social Disparity and Inequality of Opportunity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Quality of Growth and Poverty Reduction in China

Part of the book series: International Research on Poverty Reduction ((IRPR))

Abstract

In Development as Freedom, Sen (1999) emphasizes that development must be focused on individual entitlements, capabilities, freedom, and rights and that economic growth is the means to these ends. In this approach, expansion of freedom is viewed as both the primary end and the principal means of economic development. It is essential to ensure basic income so that people may be free from poverty and hunger, to provide access to basic health care so that people may live a long and healthy life, and to afford access to education so that people may realize their aspirations. People are both the beneficiaries of development and the agents of the progress and changes that development brings about. This means issues of equity must be central to economic development. The notion of equity includes both income and human capabilities, such as health and education outcomes, equality of opportunities, and gender equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The comparison between China and India is most telling: in China, over 45 % of female adults were literate and the female labor participation rate was over 70 % in the 1980s, compared with 25 % and 32 %, respectively, in India during the same period.

  2. 2.

    US Census Bureau and Population Division (2005).

  3. 3.

    Office for National Statistics. Life expectancy at birth and at age 65 by local areas in the United Kingdom.

  4. 4.

    The leading causes of death include postpartum hemorrhage, hypertension, and embolism for maternal deaths and neonatal trauma, preterm delivery, and low birth weight for child deaths.

  5. 5.

    The health sector reform distorted the incentives of health-care providers, encouraging hospitals to recover costs through high fees on drugs and undertaking expensive medical procedures while reducing the supply of preventive care services.

  6. 6.

    The intergenerational (or social) mobility is commonly measured by intergenerational earnings elasticity—elasticity of earnings between parents and their children (the higher the number, the lower the intergenerational earnings mobility).

References

  • Banister J (2004) Shortage of girls in China today. J Popul Res 21(1):19–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corak M (2012) Inequality from generation to generation: The United States in comparison. In: Rycroft R (ed) The economics of inequality, poverty, and discrimination in the 21st century, ABC-CLIO. Praeger, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar D (2007) Poverty, inequality and social disparities during China’s economic reform. World Bank working paper, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu X, Tang S (1995) Reform of the Chinese health care financing system. Health Policy 32:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haizheng L, Fraumeni BM, Kui ZQ, Wang XJ (2009) Human capital in China, NBER working paper, 15500. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Zhu C, Feldman M (2004) Gender differences in child survival in contemporary rural China: a county study. J Biosoc Sci 36:83–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Rao K, Fei J (1998) Economic transition and health transition: comparing China and Russia. Health Policy 44:103–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) OECD environmental performance reviews: China. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen KA (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang SL, Meng QY, Chen L, Bekedam H, Evans T, Whitehead M (2008) Tackling the challenges to health equity in China. Health system reform in China, Published online

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2005) China human development report. UNDP, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2008) Millenium Development Goals Progress

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau Population Division (2005) Interim state population projections. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Social Sciences Academic Press (China) and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wang, X., Wang, L., Wang, Y. (2014). Social Disparity and Inequality of Opportunity. In: The Quality of Growth and Poverty Reduction in China. International Research on Poverty Reduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36346-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36346-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36345-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36346-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics