Abstract
In this chapter, I suggest a methodological and theoretical framework for preliminary investigations designed to gauge the potential societal response to the discovery of either microbial or intelligent extraterrestrial life. The uncritical use of analogies to the ethnographic record of contact between societies and the discovery of extraterrestrial life has been, rightfully, the target of sharp criticism since the earliest days of the scientific search for this life. However, I argue that by approaching this record with different epistemological premises, and shifting the focus from the material to the symbolic and cognitive dimensions of this contact, one can avoid many of the pitfalls of the analogical mode of argumentation, and provide a solid conceptual basis for the development of an adequate heuristic. Specifically, I draw upon the germinal debate between Sahlins and Obeyesekere over the nature of human meaning-making in the face of radically other societies and their meanings to treat the discovery of an intelligent civilization. In parallel, I draw upon Sharp’s discussion of the relationship between the changes in the symbolic order and the material organization of society to suggest that much of this analysis also applies to the discovery of extraterrestrial microbial life. In both cases, I do not argue for a one-to-one correspondence between the historical and the contemporary, but rather use these arguments as illustrations of what I see as particularly profitable modes of conceptualizing the universal human processes of making sense out of novel objects and phenomena. Finally, this chapter argues for a mixed-methods quantitative-qualitative investigation into the character and distribution of societal resources for understanding life and intelligence, rather than the extraterrestrial as such. The qualitative is advanced as a necessary adjunct to the quantitative, as the best method for gaining access to the repertoire of cultural frames upon which people more or less unconsciously draw in forming their understandings of the world. The focus on life and intelligence is justified both insofar as they are the categories which will be brought to bear on the extraterrestrial in terms of integrating it into people’s worldviews, and insofar as these categories are substantially more implicated in both societal and personal stability than that of the extraterrestrial as such.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the former case, of course, there could be substantial disruption at the social level if the life appears to confirm pop-culture horror stories about extraterrestrial life, but this would not pose a cognitive challenge.
References
Battaglia, Debbora. 2006. E.T. Culture: Anthropology in Outerspaces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Denning, Kathryn. 2009. “Ten Thousand Revolutions: Conjectures about Civilizations” Acta Astronautica 68: 381–388.
Denning, Kathryn. 2013. “Impossible Predictions of the Unprecedented: Analogy, History, and the Work of Prognostication.” In Astrobiology, History, and Society: Life Beyond Earth and the Impact of Discovery, ed. Douglas A. Vakoch. Heidelberg: Springer.
Helmreich, Stefan. 2009. Alien Ocean: Anthropological Voyages in Microbial Seas. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lamb, David. 2001. The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence: A Philosophical Inquiry. London: Routledge.
Luhmann, Niklas. 1998. Observations on Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Merton, Robert. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. New York: The Free Press.
Obeyesekere, Gananath. 1997. The Apotheosis of Captain Cook: European Mythmaking in the Pacific. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Peters, Ted. 2013. “Would the Discovery of ETI Provoke a Religious Crisis?” In Astrobiology, History, and Society: Life Beyond Earth and the Impact of Discovery, ed. Douglas A. Vakoch. Heidelberg: Springer.
Rabinow, Paul. 2005. “Artificiality and Enlightenment: From Sociobiology to Biosociality.” In Anthropologies of Modernity: Foucault, Governmentality, and Life Politics, ed. Jonathan Inda, 181–193. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rose, Nikolas. 2006. The Politics of Life Itself, Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rose, Nikolas, and Carlos Novas. 2005. “Biological Citizenship.” In Global Assemblages, eds. Aihwa Ong and Stephen Collier, 439–463. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sagan, Carl, ed. 1973. Communication with Extraterrestrial Intelligence. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sahlins, Marshall. 1985. Islands of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sharp, Lauriston. 1952. “Steel Axes for Stone Age Australians.” Human Organization 11 (2): 17–22.
Weigel, M. Margaret, and Kathryn Coe. 2013. “Impact of Extraterrestrial Life Discovery for Third World Societies: Anthropological and Public Health Considerations.” In Astrobiology, History, and Society: Life Beyond Earth and the Impact of Discovery, ed. Douglas A. Vakoch. Heidelberg: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lowrie, I. (2013). Cultural Resources and Cognitive Frames: Keys to an Anthropological Approach to Prediction. In: Vakoch, D. (eds) Astrobiology, History, and Society. Advances in Astrobiology and Biogeophysics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35983-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35983-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35982-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35983-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)