Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Dynamic Approach to Measure the Effect of Postponement Strategy on the Performance of Manufacturing and Logistics Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamics in Logistics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Logistics ((LNLO))

  • 2238 Accesses

Abstract

The current dynamic business environment dominated by competition between supply chains, factors such as the increase in demand variability, the proliferation of product variety, the process and supply uncertainty and the increased complexity of manufacturing and logistics networks are crucial in the increasingly globalized competitive arena. One way to meet this challenge is to use of postponement as a strategy to delay the point of product differentiation on space and time along the supply chain. This strategy has been increasingly used as an important tool for supply chain management. Thus, this article aims to present a dynamic method and a set of attributes and metrics to measure and evaluate the effect of postponement on the performance of manufacturing and logistics processes. Subsequently, the method has been applied in a case study on a Brazilian industrial company, considering two different scenarios, represented by total anticipated demand in space and time (decentralized inventory/make-to-stock) and the total demand postponement in space and time (centralized inventory/make-to-order).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alderson W (1950) Marketing efficiency and the principle of postponement. Cost Profit Outlook 3:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Battezzati L, Magnanimous R (2000) Supply chains for FMCG and industrial products in Italy: practices and advantages of the postponement. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 30(5):413–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blecker T, Abdelkafi N (2006) Complexity and variety in mass customization systems: analysis and recommendations. Manag Decis 44(7):908–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boone CA, Craighead CW, Hanna JB (2007) Postponement: an evolving supply chain concept. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 37(8):594–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowersox DJ, Closs DJ (1996) Logistical management: the integrated supply chain process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown AO, Lee HL, Petrakian R (2000) Xilinx improves its semiconductor supply chain using product and process postponement. Interfaces 30(4):65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucklin LP (1965) Postponement, speculation and the structure of distribution channels. J Mark Res 2:26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M (1992) Logistics and supply chain management: strategies for reducing cost and improving services. Financial Times Pitman Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M (2000) The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Ind Mark Manage 29(1):37–44

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M, Holweg M (2011) Supply chain 2.0: managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 41(1):63–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazelle E (2002) Supply chain strategy: the logistics of supply chain management. McGraw-Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisperska-Moron D, Swierczek A (2010) The selected determinants of manufacturing postponement within supply chain context: An international study. Int J Prod Econ 133(1):192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feitzinger E, Lee HL (1997) Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: the power of postponement. Harvard Bus Rev 75(1):116–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Graman GA, Magazine MJ (2006) Implementation issues influencing the decision to adopt postponement. Int J Oper Prod Manage 26(10):1068–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight FH (1921) Risk, Uncertainty and profit. Hart, Schaffner and Marx, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Billington C (1994) Designing products and processes for postponement. Management of design: engineering and management perspectives. Kluwer Academic, Boston, pp 105–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL, Tang CS (1997) Modelling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Manage Sci 43(1):40–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkola JH, Skjøtt-Larsen T (2004) Supply-chain integration: implications for mass customization, modularization, and postponement strategies. Prod Plan Control 15(4):352–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagh JD, Cooper MC (1998) Supply chain postponement and speculation strategies: how to choose the right strategy. J Bus Logistics 19(2):13–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramdas K (2003) Managing product variety: an integrative review and research directions. Prod Oper Manage 12(1):79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall T, Ulrich K (2001) Product variety, supply chain structure, and firm performance: an empirical examination of the U.S. bicycle industry. Manage Sci 47(12):1588–1604 INFORMS

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skipworth H (2003) The application of form postponement in manufacturing. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Stäblein T, Holweg M, Miemczyk J (2011) Theoretical versus actual product Variety: how much customization of the customers really demand? Int J Oper Prod Manage 31(3):350–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr MK (1965), “Modular production, a new concept”, Harvard Bus Rev 53(6):131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan JM Lee HL (2003) Design for Postponement. In: de Kok A.G., Graves S.C. (eds.): Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management: Design, Coordination and Operation. Elsevier Publishers, pp 199–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoek RI (1997) Postponed manufacturing: a case study in the food supply chain. Suppl Chain Manage 2(2): 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoek RI (1998) Reconfiguring logistic systems through postponement strategies. J Bus Logistics 19:22

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoek, R.I., (1999) Postponement and the reconfiguration challenge for food supply chains, Supp Chain Manage, 4(1): 18–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoek RI, Peelen PDE, Commandeur PDHR (1999) Achieving mass customization through postponement: a study of international changes. J Market-Focused Manage 3(3):353–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hoek RI (2001) The rediscovery of postponement: a literature review and directions for research. J Oper Manage 19(2):161–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang B, Burns ND (2003) Implications of postponement for the supply chain. Int J Prod Res 41(9):2075–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang B, Burns ND, Backhouse CJ (2004) Postponement: review and an integrated framework. Int J Oper Prod Manage 24(5):268–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Tan GW (2001) Classification of postponement strategies and performance metrics framework. In: Proceedings of the 4th PACIS

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn W, Bowersox DJ (1988) Planning physical distribution with the principle of postponement. J Bus Logistics 9(2):117–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Znou D, Mill L (2002) An empirical study of the role of postponement application in reducing supply chain complexity. In: IEEE international engineering management conference, vol 1, pp 448–453

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CAPES Foundation Ministry of Education of Brazil, Brasília, DF, Brazil

    Luiz Eduardo Simão

  2. UFSC—Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil

    Luiz Eduardo Simão & Mirian Buss Gonçalves

  3. Campus Universitário, Caixa Postal 476, Trindade, Florianópolis, SC, CEP 88040-900, Brazil

    Luiz Eduardo Simão & Mirian Buss Gonçalves

Authors
  1. Luiz Eduardo Simão
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mirian Buss Gonçalves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luiz Eduardo Simão .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Computer Science, University of Bremen, Linzer Straße 9a, Bremen, 28359, Germany

    Hans-Jörg Kreowski

  2. Rector of the University of Bremen, Hochschulring 20, Bremen, 28359, Germany

    Bernd Scholz-Reiter

  3. Logistik (BIBA), Planung und Steuerung, Bremer Institut für Produktion und, Hochschulring 20, Bremen, 28359, Germany

    Klaus-Dieter Thoben

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Simão, L.E., Gonçalves, M.B. (2013). A Dynamic Approach to Measure the Effect of Postponement Strategy on the Performance of Manufacturing and Logistics Processes. In: Kreowski, HJ., Scholz-Reiter, B., Thoben, KD. (eds) Dynamics in Logistics. Lecture Notes in Logistics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35966-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35966-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35965-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35966-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation