Skip to main content

Coalitions and Catastrophic Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter surveys the results in general equilibrium theory based on dynamical models, and emphasizes the role of structural stability. In this context it is natural to consider a preference field H for the society, combining economic fields, associated with the preferred changes wrought by agents in the economic market place, together with fields of preferred changes in the polity. A preference field specifies at each point \( x\in \) the space of states, X, a set of feasible vectors of change. A condition called half-openness of H is sufficient to guarantee existence of a local direction gradient, d, for the society, and thus of a social choice. when half openness fails then the dynamical system so defined can be chaotic. We apply some of these abstract ideas to the question of dealing with climate change.

This chapter is based on work supported by NSF grant 0715929.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example Hardin (1971, 1982), Taylor (1976, 1982), Axelrod and Hamilton (1981), Axelrod (1981); Axelrod (1984), Kreps et al. (1982), Margolis (1982).

  2. 2.

    See the discussion in Schofield (2011).

  3. 3.

    Weitzman (2009) and Chichilnisky (2010). See also Chichilinisky ((1996b, 2000, 2011a, b) and Eisenberger (2010) on other catastrophic events such as collision with an asteroid.

  4. 4.

    See Schofield (1977); Schofield (1980a); Schofield (1980b). In a sense these voting theorems can be regarded as derivative of Arrow’s Impossibility Theorem (Arrow 1951). See also Arrow (1986).

  5. 5.

    The theory of chaos or complexity is rooted in Smale’s fundamental theorem (Smale 1966) that structural stability of dynamical systems is not “generic” or typical whenever the state space has more than two dimensions.

  6. 6.

    In their early analysis of chaos, Li and Yorke (1975) showed that in the domain of a chaotic transformation \(f\) it was possible for almost any pair of positions \((x,y)\) to transition from \(x\) to \(y=f^{r}(x),\) where \(f^{r}\) means the \(r\) times reiteration of \(f.\)

  7. 7.

    See Minsky (1975); Minsky (1986).

  8. 8.

    Karklins and Petersen (1993), Lohmann (1994). See also Bikhchandani et al. (1992).

  9. 9.

    The response by the citizens of these countries to the demise of Osama bin Laden on May 2, 2011, is in large degree also unpredictable.

  10. 10.

    See for example Carothers (2002) and Collier (2009).

  11. 11.

    Golub and Jackson (2010).

  12. 12.

    See Henrich et al. (2004, 2005), which reports on experiments in fifteen “small-scale societies,” using the game theoretic tools of the “prisoners’ dilemma,” the “ultimatum game,” etc.

  13. 13.

    See also Acemoglu and Robinson (2008).

  14. 14.

    The popular protests in N.Africa and the Middle East in 2011 were in opposition to oligarchic and autocratic power.

  15. 15.

    See also Shafer and Sonnenschein (1975).

  16. 16.

    In other words, there exists \(d\) such that \(d(v)>0\) for all \(v\in H(x)\subset T_{x}W\), whenever \(H(x)\ne \Upphi .\)

  17. 17.

    That is a critical Nash equilibrium which is an attractor of the integral curves.

  18. 18.

    Schofield (1972a, b), Ladha (1992, 1993, 1995, 1996), Ladha and Miller (1996).

  19. 19.

    Sunstein (2006, 2011) also notes that belief aggregation can lead to a situation where subgroups in the society come to hold very disparate opinions.

  20. 20.

    Gleick (1987), Buchanan (2001); Buchanan (2003), Gladwell (2002), Johnson (2002), Barabasi (2003); Barabasi (2011), Strogatz (2004), Watts (2002, 2003), Surowiecki (2005), Ball (2004), Christakis and Fowler (2011).

  21. 21.

    See, for example, Mandelbrot and Hudson (2004), Shiller (2003); Shiller (2005), Taleb (2007), Barbera (2009), Cassidy (2009), Fox (2009).

  22. 22.

    See also the earlier work by Richardson (1922) and by the team under von Neumann at the Institute for advanced Studies at Princeton using the computer known as ENIAC as described by Dyson (2012).

  23. 23.

    See for example Cavallli-Sforza and Feldman (1981), Bowles et al. (2003).

  24. 24.

    See also Eldredge (1976), Gould (1976).

  25. 25.

    See Maynard Smith (1982) for the game theoretic notion of evolutionary stable strategy.

  26. 26.

    Indeed as I understand the dynamical models, the chaotic episodes are due to the complex interactions of dynamical processes in the oceans, on the land, in weather, and in the heavens. These are very like interlinked coalitions of non-gradient vector fields.

  27. 27.

    This can be shown adapting the proof technique of Banks et al. (2002, 2006).

  28. 28.

    This depends on the extension of Michael’s selection theorem by Mas-Colell (1979).

  29. 29.

    It is bounded by median arcs such as \((M_{1},M_{2}).\)

  30. 30.

    See also Arrow (1969) and later analyses of such games in Schofield and Tovey (1992).

  31. 31.

    I use this as a metaphor derived from the notion of inflation in cosmology (Penrose 2011). If we can use the term entropy to characterise the distribution of events in the heart, then entropy increases dramatically at the inflationary point.

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2008). Oligarchic versus democratic societies. Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2008). Persistence of power, elites, and institutions. American Economic Review, 98, 267–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2011). Why nations fail. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J., & Yared, P. (2009). Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56, 1043–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2010). Cascades in networks and aggregate volatility. NBER Working Paper # 16516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aliprantis, C., & Brown, D. J. (1983). Equilibria in markets with a Riesz space of commodities. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 11, 189–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1969). Tullock and an existence theorem. Public Choice, 6, 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1986). Rationality of self and others in an economic system. Journal of Business, 59, S385–S399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22, 265–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., & Banks, J. (1996). Information aggregation, rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem. American Political Science Review, 90, 34–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1981). The emergence of cooperation among egoists. American Political Science Review, 75, 306–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bak, P. (1996). How nature works: The science of self oerganized criticality. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bak, P., & Sneppen, K. (1993). Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution. Physical Review Letters, 71(24), 4083–4086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, P. (2004). Critical mass. New York: Ferrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. S. (1995). Singularity theory and core existence in the spatial model. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 24, 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J., Duggan, J., & Le Breton, M. (2002). Bounds for mixed strategy equilibria and the spatial model of elections. Journal of Economic Theory, 103, 88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J., Duggan, J., & Le Breton, M. (2006). Social choice and electoral competition in the general spatial model. Journal of Economic Theory, 126, 194–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A.-L. (2003). Linked. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A.-L. (2011). Bursts. New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbera, R. (2009). The cost of capitalism: Understanding market mayhem. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. (1975). The existence of maximal elements and equilibria in the absence of transitivity. Typescript: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. (1992). When non-transitive relations take maxima and competitive equilibrium can’t be beat. In R. Riezman & W. Neuefeind (Eds.), Economic theory and international trade. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikhchandani, S., Hirschleifer, D., & Welsh, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as information cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 992–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (2005). Natural justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (2009). Rational decisions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., et al. (2003). The co-evolution of individual behaviors and socal institutions. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 223, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J., & Richerson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1971). The Lefschetz fixed point theorem. Glenview, IL: Scott and Foreman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, L. E. J. (1912). Uber abbildung von mannigfaltikeiten. Mathematische Annalen, 71, 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, M. (2001). Ubiquity. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, M. (2003). Nexus. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18, 175–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, W. H. (2003). The ascent of mind. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carothers, T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, J. (2009). How markets fail: The logic of economic calamities. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallli-Sforza, L., & Feldman, M. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1992). Social diversity, arbitrage, and gains from trade: A unified perspective on resource allocation. American Economic Review, 84, 427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1993). Intersecting families of sets and the topology of cones in economics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 29, 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1995). Limited arbitrage is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a competitive equilibrium with or without short sales. Economic Theory, 5, 79–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1996a). Markets and games: A simple equivalence among the core, equilibrium and limited arbitrage. Metroeconomica, 47, 266–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1996b). An axiomatic approach to sustainable development. Social Choice and Welfare, 13, 231–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1997a). A topological invariant for competitive markets. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 28, 445–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1997b). Limited arbitrage is necessary and sufficient for the existence of a equilibrium. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 28, 470–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1997c). Market arbitrage, social choice and the core. Social Choice and Welfare, 14, 161–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (2000). An axiomatic approach to choice under uncertainty with catastrophic risks. Resource Energy Economics, 22, 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (2009a). The topology of fear. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 45, 807–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (2009b). Avoiding extinction: Equal treatment of the present and the future. Working Paper, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (2010). The foundations of statistics with black swans. Mathematical Social Sciences, 59, 184–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G., & Eisenberger, P. (2010). Asteroids: Assessing catastrophic risks. Journal of Probability and Statistics Article ID 954750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (2011a) Catastrophic risks with finite or infinite states. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 23, F11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (2011b). Sustainable markets with short sales. Economic Theory (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N., & Fowler, J. H. (2011). Connected. New York: Back Bay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2009). Wars, guns and votes. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, P. (2010). The plundered planet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet, N. (1994 [1785]) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix. Paris: Imprimerie Royale. Translated in part in: McLean I, Hewitt F, Condorcet: Foundations of social choice and political theory. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcos, A., et al. (2002). Imitation and contrarian behavior: Hyperbolic bubbles, crashes and chaos. Quantitative Finance, 2, 264–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2005). Three conceptions of intergenerational Justice. In H. Lillehammer & D. H. Mellor (Eds.), Ramsey’s legacy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1970). Economies with a finite number of equilibria. Econometrica, 38, 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1976). The application to economics of differential topology and global analysis: Regular differentiable economies. American Economic Review, 66, 280–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher, G. (2006). The unfolding of language. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, G. (2012). Turing’s Cathedral. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Networks, crowds and markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. N. (2010). A vast machine: Computer models, climate data, and the politics of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. (1976). Differential evolutionary rates. Paleobiology, 2, 174–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibrium. In T. Schopf (Ed.), Models of paleobiology. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, K. (1961). A generalization of Tychonoff’s fixed point theorem. Mathematische Annalen, 42, 305–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (1997). Introduction. In N. Ferguson (Ed.), Virtual history. London: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2002). Empire: The rise and demise of the British world order. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2011). Civilization. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, H., Sneppen, K., & Bak, P. (1993). A mean field theory for a simple model of evolution. Physical Review Letters, 71, 4087–4090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. (2009). The myth of the rational market. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order. New York: Ferrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M.S. (2008). Human. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206, 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gladwell, M. (2002). The tipping point. New York: Back Bay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golub, B., & Jackson, M. (2010). Naive learning in social networks and the wisdom of crowds. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2, 112–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1976). The gnemoic metronome as a null hypothesis. Paleobiology, 2, 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (2002). The structure of evolutionary theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. (1973). On the notion of equilibrium in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. (1970). Selfish and spiteful behavior in an evolutionary model. Nature, 228, 1218–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968 [1973]). The tragedy of the commons. In H. E. Daly (Ed.), Towards a steady state economy. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1971). Collective action as an agreeable prisons’ dilemma. Behavioral Sciences, 16, 472–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., et al. (2004). Foundations of human sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., et al. (2005).‘Economic man’ in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 795–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, M. (1976). Differential topology. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (2009 [1651]). In J. C. A. Gaskin (Ed.), Leviathan; or the matter, forme, and power of a common-wealth, ecclesiastical and civil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. B. (2011). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2006). Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2002). Emergence. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karklins, R., & Petersen, R. (1993). Decision calculus of protestors and regime change: Eastern Europe 1989. Journal of Politics, 55, 588–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1984). After hegemony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R., & Nye, R. (1977). Power and interdependence. New York: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, C. (1973). The world in depression 1929–1939. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaster, B., Kuratowski, K., & Mazurkiewicz, S. (1929). Ein beweis des fixpunktsatzes fur n-dimensionale simplexe. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 14, 132–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konishi, H. (1996). Equilibrium in abstract political economies: With an application to a public good economy with voting. Social Choice and Welfare, 13, 43–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, G. H. (1973). On a class of equilibrium conditions for majority rule. Econometrica, 41, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M., et al. (1982). Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladha, K. (1992). Condorcet’s jury theorem, free speech and correlated votes. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 617–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladha, K. (1993). Condorcet’s jury theorem in the light of de Finetti’s theorem: Majority rule with correlated votes. Social Choice and Welfare, 10, 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladha, K., & Miller, G. (1996). Political discourse, factions and the general will: correlated voting and Condorcet’s jury theorem. In N. Schofield (Ed.), Collective decision making. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplace, P. S. (1951 [1814]). Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Paris: Gauthiers-Villars. A philosophical essay on probabilities. (trans. Truscott F, Emory F) New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, T. Y., & Yorke, J. A. (1975). Period three implies chaos. American Mathematical Monthly, 82, 985–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, S. (1994). The dynamics of Information cascades. World Politics, 47, 42–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N. (1962). The statistical prediction of solutions of dynamical equations. Proceedings International Symposium on Numerical Weather Prediction, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N. (1963). Deterministic non periodic flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 130, 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The essence of chaos. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J. (1999). Federalist X. In J. Rakove (Ed.), Madison: Writings. New York: Library Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B., & Hudson, R. (2004). The (mis)behavior of markets. New York: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. (1982). Selfishness, altruism and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L., & Sagan, D. (2002). Acquiring genomes. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A. (1979). A selection theorem for open graph correspondences with star-shaped values. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 68, 273–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1982). Evolution and the theory of games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D. (1976). Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control. Journal of Economic Theory, 12, 472–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D. (1979). General conditions for global intransitivities in formal voting models. Econometrica, 47, 1085–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D. (1986). Covering, dominance and institution free properties of social choice. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 283–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, R. D., & Schofield, N. (1987). Generalized symmetry conditions at a core point. Econometrica, 55, 923–933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWhorter, J. (2001). The power of Babel. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. C. (1973). Theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management, 4, 141–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael, E. (1956). Continuous selections I. Annals of Mathematics, 63, 361–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & Schofield, N. (2003). Activists and partisan realignment in the U.S. American Political Science Review, 97, 245–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G., & Schofield, N. (2008). The transformation of the Republican and Democratic party coalitions in the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 6, 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. (1975). John Maynard Keynes. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky, H. (1986). Stabilizing an unstable economy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, K. (1979). The vetoers in a simple game with ordinal preference. International Journal of Game Theory, 8, 55–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2005). The intellectual origins of modern economic growth. Journal of Economic History, 65, 285–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J. (2010). The enlightened economy: An economic history of Britain 1700–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokyr, J., & Nye, V. C. (2007). Distributional coalitions, the industrial revolution, and the origins of economic growth in Britain. Southern Economics Journal, 74, 50–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, I. (2010). Why the West rules. New York: Ferrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth century England. Journal of Economic History, 49, 803–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., Wallis, B., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. (2011). Supercooperators. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, P. (2001). Butterfly economics. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1935). The mind and society [Trattato di sociologia generale]. Brace, New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (2011). On what matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (2011). Cycles of time. London: The Bodney Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C. R. (1967). A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. American Economic Review, 57, 787–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959). Prediction and prophecy in the social sciences. In P. Gardiner (Ed.), Theories of history. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, E. (2009). A model of far-sighted voting. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, C. C. (2002). Real mathematical analysis. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rader, T. (1972). Theory of general economic equilibrium. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, D. (1993). A chaotic model of power concentration in the international system. International Studies Quarterly, 37, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L. F. (1922). Weather prediction by numerical process. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. (1985a). Price dynamics, social choice, voting methods, probability and chaos. In D. Aliprantis, O. Burkenshaw, & N. J. Rothman (Eds.), Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, No. 244. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. (1985b). A chaotic exploration of aggregation paradoxes. SIAM Review, 37, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. (1995). Mathematical complexity of simple economics. Notes American Mathematical Society, 42, 222–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. (1997). The generic existence of a core for q-rules. Economic Theory, 9, 219–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. (2001a). Decisions and elections: Explaining the unexpected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. (2001b). Chaotic elections. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saari, D. (2008). Disposing dictators, demystifying voting paradoxes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1972a). Is majority rule special?. In R. G. Niemi & H. F. Weisberg (Eds.), Probability models of collective decision-making. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1972b). Ethical decision rules for uncertain voters. British Journal of Political Science, 2, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1975). A game theoretic analysis of Olson’s game of collective action. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 19, 441–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1977). The logic of catastrophe. Human Ecology, 5, 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1978). Instability of simple dynamic games. Review of Economic Studies, 45, 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1979). Rationality or chaos in social choice. Greek Economic Review, 1, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1980a). Generic properties of simple Bergson-Samuelson welfare functions. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 7, 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1980b). Catastrophe theory and dynamic games. Quality Quantity, 14, 529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1983a). Equilibria in simple dynamic games. In P. Pattanaik & M. Salles (Eds.), Social choice and welfare (pp. 269–284). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1983b). Generic instability of majority rule. Review of Economic Studies, 50, 695–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1984a). Existence of equilibrium on a manifold. Mathematics of Operations Research, 9, 545–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1984b). Social equilibrium and cycles on compact sets. Journal of Economic Theory, 33, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1984c). Classification theorem for smooth social choice on a manifold. Social Choice and Welfare, 1, 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1985). Anarchy, altruism and cooperation. Social Choice and Welfare, 2, 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N., & Tovey, C. (1992). Probability and convergence for supra-majority rule with Euclidean preferences. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 16, 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1999a). The heart and the uncovered set. Journal of Economics Supplement, 8, 79–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1999b). A smooth social choice method of preference aggregation. In M. Wooders (Ed.), Topics in mathematical economics and game theory: Essays in honor of R. Aumann. Providence, RI: Fields Institute, American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (1999c). The \(C^{1}-\)topology on the space of smooth preferences. Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 445–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (2002). Evolution of the constitution. British Journal of Political Sciences, 32, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (2003). Mathematical methods in economics and social choice. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (2006). Architects of political change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (2007). The mean voter theorem: Necessary and sufficient conditions for convergent equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies, 74, 965–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (2010). Social orders. Social Choice and Welfare, 34, 503–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N. (2011). Is the political economy stable or chaotic? Czech Economic Review, 5, 76–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, N., & Schnidman E. (2011). Gridlock or leadership in U.S. Electoral Politics. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, F., et al. (2009). Economic networks: The new challenges. Science, 325, 422–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, W., & Sonnenschein, H. (1975). Equilibrium in abstract economies without ordered preferences. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2, 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. (2003). The new financial order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiller, R. (2005). Irrational exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smale, S. (1966). Structurally stable systems are not dense. American Journal of Mathematics, 88, 491–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale, S. (1974a). Global analysis and economics IIA: Extension of a theorem of Debreu. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smale, S. (1974b). Global analysis and economics IV. Finiteness and stability of equilibria with general consumption sets and production. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1984 [1759]). The theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strnad, J. (1985). The structure of continuous-valued neutral monotonic social functions. Social Choice and Welfare, 2, 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz, S. (2004). Sync. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2009). The global deal. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2011). Going to extremes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2005). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan. New York: Random.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N., & Blyth, M. (2011). The black swan of Cairo. Foreign Affairs, 90(3), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tataru, M. (1999). Growth rates in multidimensional spatial voting. Mathematical Social Sciences, 37, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1976). Anarchy and cooperation. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1982). Community, anarchy and liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, R. (1975). Structural stability and morphogenesis. Reading, MA: Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park: Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. (1977). On the existence of maximal elements. Journal of Economic Theory, 16, 470–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. (2002). A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99, 5766–5771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, D. (2003). Six degrees. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. (2009). Additive damages, fat-tailed climate dynamics, and uncertain discounting. Economics, 3, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (2012). The social conquest of Earth. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman, E. C. (1977). Catastrophe theory: Selected papers, 1972–77. New York: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G. K. (1965). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. New York: Hafner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman Schofield .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schofield, N. (2013). Coalitions and Catastrophic Climate Change. In: Holler, M., Nurmi, H. (eds) Power, Voting, and Voting Power: 30 Years After. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35929-3_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35929-3_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35928-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35929-3

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics