Skip to main content

Picturesque Authenticity in Early Archaeological Photography in British India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
'Archaeologizing' Heritage?

Abstract

In the early years of photography and archaeology in colonial India, from the middle of the nineteenth century to the early twentieth century, the character of early archaeological photography was informed both by notions of empire as well as by artistic traditions that originated in Europe—namely, English picturesque landscape painting.

In this study attention is given to an overt transcultural process as exemplified in the entanglement of the picturesque aesthetic and the photographic images of ruins. This article addresses archaeological practice in colonial India and focuses particularly on notions of authenticity in both photographs and conservation philosophies. Like the picturesque pictorial tradition—in which one of the central subject matters was architectural remains depicted as having been reconquered by nature and time—colonial conservation principles for the preservation of Indian sites revealed an obsession with ruins. This suggested that, however much in decay, a building’s original work was of infinitely more historical value than any later or new work. In the field of archaeology the qualities of photography, which were understood to communicate ‘stern fidelity,’ made the medium a much-appreciated tool for maintaining ‘authentic’ records of the ruination of Indian monuments. Both the photographer and the archaeologist sought to preserve a ruin in the physical condition that it was first received. In this way, notions of the picturesque aesthetic were translated to colonial archaeological practice with the approval of the Archaeological Survey of India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Editor’s note: In comparison to Weiler’s focus on photographs as ‘cultural texts’, Marshall’s Manual can be seen as a ‘written cultural text of British colonialism’, see the contribution by Sengupta in this volume.

  2. 2.

    Editor’s note: Over the course of the last decades, this colonial trend of ‘archaeologizing’ architectural sites through their translation into picturesque motives has been, to a certain extent, continued in the virtual renderings of architectural sites by incorporating historic photographs into their data accumulation. The differences in applying these virtual models to different audiences and purposes is discussed in this volume from the perspective of surface- and image-based models (see Gruen), building research (Toubekis/Jansen, Sanday), architectural history (Nguonphan, Cunin), and the globalized tourist industry (Chermayeff).

  3. 3.

    Cited from Proposals for publishing an accurate description of the Antiquities of Athens (1748) as quoted in a footnote in Stuart and Revett 1762–1816, vol. I (1762), preface).

  4. 4.

    The book includes the four series of letters Bourne wrote to the British Journal of Photography. They were first published between 1863 and 1870. Also included are the full texts of two of his earlier lectures: On Some of the Requisites Necessary for the Production of a Good Photograph, given by Bourne before the Nottingham Photographic Society in 1860; and The Original Fothergill Process, first published in the British Journal of Photography in 1862.

  5. 5.

    Compare, for example, Alexander Greenlaw’s photographs of the ruins of Vijayanagara in the Alkazi Collection of Photography, Lotus Mahal from the South, 1856 (ACP: 99.01.0003), or Bhima’s Gateway, 1856 (ACP: 99.02.0028) (Greenlaw’s pictures are published in Michell 2008) with the woodcuts nr. 243 of a Garden Pavilion at Vijayanagar, or nr. 168 View of City Gateway, Vijayanagar (Fergusson 1910, vol. I).

  6. 6.

    According to the Art Journal, published in 1871 on the occasion of the International Exhibition in London, Fergusson’s task to achieve a deeper understanding of Indian architecture through systematic enquiry had been hindered primarily by the difficulty of obtaining “really accurate representation of the great works of the architects and sculptors of India.” However, “photography has been the means of overcoming this difficulty, with a success, too, unsurpassed probably in any other similar field of operation.” (Wallis 1871, 65).

  7. 7.

    Sophie Gordon observes that when photographing landscapes and topographical views Greenlaw often kept away from the purely picturesque, highlighting unusual compositions instead (Gordon 2008, 159).

  8. 8.

    Editor’s note: Whereas photographic depictions codified the colonial gaze on the ‘archaeologized’ architectural object, prescriptive manuals for archaeologists and conservators codified the ‘archaeologizing practice’ on cultural sites (compare Sengupta in this volume).

  9. 9.

    Lala Deen Dayal was a leading Indian professional who was patronized by both Indian princes and the British Raj. He was the official court photographer to the sixth Nizam of Hyderabad, Mahbub Ali Khan, Asif Jah VI.

  10. 10.

    Editor’s note: Staffage of the ‘colonized local’ was and still is an effective strategy to decontextualize the local as a real stakeholder of the depicted property and site. In most cases, the staffage ‘local’ figures do not really engage with the sites as their owners but merely serve as picturesque decoration of a supposedly archaeological and dead site without owners. This is true for the staffage figures in reconstitutive drawings (compare the constribution by Baptiste) and the description in tourist guide books through archaeological parcours (compare Falser). However, staffage figures play a minor role in virtual representations of archaeological sites, as is discussed in various contributions in this volume, and as it is depicted on the front cover of this book.

References

  • Barr, Captain Harry. 1855. Journal of the Photographic Society of Bombay 1: 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bautze, Joachim K. 2008. “The Beginning of Photography in India and the Photographers.” In Picturesque Views. Mughal India in Nineteenth-Century Photography, edited by Raffael Dedo Gadebusch, 17–34. Osterfildern: Hatje Cantz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, Samuel. 2001. “On Some of the Requisites Necessary for the Production of a Good Photograph, 1860.” In Photographic Journeys in the Himalayas. Samuel Bourne, edited by Hugh Ashley Rayner, 163–182. Bath: Pagoda Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Bernard S. 1996. Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge. The British in India. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, Alexander. 1864. “Report on the Proceedings of the Archaeological Survey to the Government of India for the Season of 1862–63.” Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 1864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, Nicholas B. 1996. Foreword to Colonialism and its Forms of Knowledge. The British in India, edited by Bernard S. Cohn, 10–17. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson, Michael S. 2010. “Orientalism and Archaeology: Writing the History of South Asia, 1600–1860.” In The Marshall Albums. Photography and Archaeology, edited by Sudeshna Guha, 66–93. Ahmedabad: Mapin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, John. 2001a. “Eine Verlagerung des Brennpunkts. Photographie in Indien 1850–1900.” In Samuel Bourne. Sieben Jahre Indien. Photographien und Reiseberichte 1863–1870, edited by Ulrich Pohlmann and Dietmar Siegert, 229–242. München: Schirmer/Mosel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001b. India: Pioneering Photographers, 1850–1900. London: The British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson, James. 1910. History of Indian and Eastern Architecture, 2 vols. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes Watson, John. 1869. Report on the Illustration of the Archaic Architecture of India &c. London: India Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, William. 1792. Three Essays: On Picturesque Beauty; on Picturesque Travel; and on Sketching Landscape: To Which is Added a Poem, on Landscape Painting. London: Printed for A. Blamire.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1798. Observations on the Western Parts of England, Relative Chiefly to Picturesque Beauty. To Which are Added, a Few Remarks on the Picturesque Beauties of the Isle of Wright. London: Printed for T. Cadell Jun. and W. Davies, Strand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, Sophie. 2008. “Greenlaw and his Successors.” In Vijayanagara. Splendour in Ruins, edited by George Michell, 153–185. Ahmedabad: Mapin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha, Sudeshna. 2010. “Photographs in Sir John Marshall’s Archaeology.” In The Marshall Albums. Photography and Archaeology, edited by Sudeshna Guha, 136–177. Ahmedabad: Mapin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha-Thakurta, Tapati. 2003. “The Compulsion of Visual Representation in Colonial India.” In Traces of India—Photography, Architecture, and the Politics of Representation, 1850–1900, edited by Maria Antonella Pelizzari, 108–139. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, John. 1916. Indian Archaeological Policy, 1915. Being a Resolution Issued by the Governor General in Council on the 22nd October 1915. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1923. Conservation Manual. A Handbook for the Use of Archaeological Officers and Others Entrusted with the Care of Ancient Monuments. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, George (ed.). 2008. Vijayanagara. Splendour in Ruins. Ahmedabad: Mapin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullens, Rev. Joseph. 1857. “On the Applications of Photography in India.” Journal of the Photographic Society of Bengal 2: 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelizzari, Maria Antonella. 2003. “From Stone to Paper: Photographs of Architecture and the Traces of History.” In Traces of India—Photography, Architecture, and the Politics of Representation, 1850–1900, edited by Maria Antonella Pelizzari, 22–57. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, Hugh Ashley (ed.). 2001. Photographic Journeys in the Himalayas. Samuel Bourne. Bath: Pagoda Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, James R. 1997. Picturing Empire: Photography and the Visualization of the British Empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriver, Peter. 2007. “The Architectural Historiography of Colonial India and its Colonial-Modern Contexts.” In Colonial Modernities. Building, dwelling and architecture in British India and Ceylon, edited by Peter Scriver and Vikramaditya Prakash, 27–50. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, James, and Nicholas Revett. 1762–1816. The Antiquities of Athens, 4 vols. London: John Haberkorn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proposals for publishing an accurate description of the Antiquities of Athens (1748) as quoted in a footnote in Stuart and Revett 1762–1816, vol. I (1762), preface.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1825. The Antiquities of Athens, Measured and Delineated by James Stuart, F.R.S and F.S.A. and Nicholas Revett, Painters and Architects, vol. 2. London: Priestley and Weale (New Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1827. The Antiquities of Athens, Measured and Delineated by James Stuart, F.R.S and F.S.A. and Nicholas Revett, Painters and Architects, vol. 3. London: Priestley and Weale (New Edition).

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1830. Antiquities of Athens and Other Places in Greece, Sicily, etc. Supplementary to the Antiquities of Athens by James Stuart, F.R.S. F.S.A and Nicholas Revett, delineated and illustrated by C.R. Cockerell, A.R.A. F.S.A., W. Kinnard, T.L. Donaldson, W. Jenkins, W. Railton, Architects. T.L. Donaldson, engraver, vol. 4. London: Priestley and Weale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tissandier, Gaston. 1876. A History and Handbook of Photography. London: Sampson Low, Marston Low & Searle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verghese, Anila. 2008. “Vijayanagara in History and Memory.” In Vijayanagara. Splendour in Ruins, edited by George Michell, 23–37. Ahmedabad: Mapin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, George. 1871. “Indian architecture.” The Art Journal New Series, vol. X, 65–69. London: Virtue and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiler, Katharina. 2009. “Das antike Athen–Eine Entdeckungsreise und ihre Inszenierung in englischen Reiseberichten und Architekturlehrbüchern des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts.” In Von Harmonie und Maß–Antike Monumente in den Architekturlehrbüchern des 16. bis 19. Jahrhunderts, edited by Elke Seibert, 62–69. Heidelberg: Mattes Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Weiler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiler, K. (2013). Picturesque Authenticity in Early Archaeological Photography in British India. In: Falser, M., Juneja, M. (eds) 'Archaeologizing' Heritage?. Transcultural Research – Heidelberg Studies on Asia and Europe in a Global Context. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35870-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics