Abstract
This chapter shows the important impact that a specific set of services, those belonging to the creative industries, have on regional economic development and wealth generation. Creative industries are a set of knowledge-based activities focused on the generation of meaning, contents and aesthetic attributes through the use of creativity, skill and talent, and have the potential to create wealth from trade and intellectual property rights. A key hypothesis in this paper is that creative services firms are a “growth driver” that promotes wealth in the regions where they are located. This is due to the fact that firms in creative industries introduce new ideas that are subsequently transferred to other firms of the economy, increasing the output of the whole economy. The objective of the research is to provide causal evidence of the impact of creative services on regional wealth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the latest classifications of activities (ISIC Rev.3.1 and NACE Rev.2) the only creative industries classified as manufacturing belong to the “fashion” sector, which is commonly assimilated to clothing and footwear industries. Within these industries it is difficult to separate those firms that focus on the intangible part (fashion design) from those more addressed to bulk production and, in many cases, a firm performs both activities.
- 2.
- 3.
Strictly speaking, some concrete creative services, such as for example cultural retail, are in practice assigned by Eurostat to the “less-knowledge-intensive group” (LKIS).
- 4.
We intentionally avoid discussing how the notion of creative industries conceptually relates to regarding other concepts such as cultural industries or arts, as well as to different taxonomies. This discussion is addressed in Pratt (2007) and UNCTAD (2010). The justifications for our use of the UNCTAD taxonomy are that it is derived from a broad and rigorous debate about an appropriate taxonomy, and that it is more comprehensive than single country based taxonomies such as that of DCMS (2009). Two thirds of the creative industries are shared among the various taxonomies so that, in this sense, the empirical differences are moderate.
- 5.
If creative manufacturing is estimated separately it exhibits an average negative impact on regional wealth. However, that does not change the evidence and implications of the general results.
- 6.
The countries for which data was not available, such as Greece, Luxembourg and Malta, were not included. Data for the year 2001 have also been used for the design of the exogenous instrumental variables.
- 7.
We refer to Lazzeretti et al. (2012) for the detail in the elaboration of the variables used as instruments.
- 8.
This does not mean actually that the variable is exogenous, only that their effects on the consistency of the estimates are not relevant. In this case, OLS produce the best linear unbiased estimator.
References
Alexander, N., & Akehurst, G. (2005). Identifying the role of services in the regional economy and servicing the identity of the region. The Service Industries Journal, 25(4), 421–428.
Asheim, B. T., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage: platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(7), 893–904.
Asheim, B. T., & Hansen, H. K. (2009). Knowledge bases, talents, and contexts: on the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography, 85(5), 425–442.
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 137–158.
Baumol, W. J., & Bowen, W. G. (1966). Performing arts, the economic dilemma. Cambridge: MIT.
Capello, R. (2006). Regional economics. Abingdon: Routledge.
Chapain, C., Cooke, P., De Propris, L., McNeil, S., & Mateos, J. (2009). Creative clusters and innovation: Putting creativity on the map. London: Nesta.
DCA (Department of Communications and the Arts, Australia). (1994). Creative nation: Commonwealth cultural policy. Available in an electronic version at http://www.nla.gov.au/creative.nation/contents.html.
DCMS. (1998). The creative industries mapping document. London: DCMS.
DCMS. (2009). Creative industries economic estimates statistical bulletin. London: DCMS.
De Miguel, B., Hervás, J. L., Boix, R., & De Miguel, M. (2012). The importance of creative industry agglomerations in explaining the wealth of European regions. European planning studies 20(8), pp. 1243–1262.
De Propris, L., Chapain, C., Cooke, P., MacNeill, S., & Mateos-García, J. (2009, August). The geography of creativity (NESTA Interim Report).
Drucker, P. (1969). The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Harper and Row.
European Commission. (2010). Green paper on cultural and creative industries: Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries. Brussels: DG Education and Culture.
Eurostat. (2009). ‘High-technology’ and ‘knowledge based services’ aggregations based on NACE Rev. 2. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
Flew, T., & Cunningham, S. (2010). Creative industries after the first decade of debate. The Information Society, 26(2), 113–123.
Hoover, E. M. (1937). Location theory and the shoe and leather industries. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lazzeretti, L., Boix, R., & Capone, F. (2012). Why do creative industries cluster? An analysis of the determinants of clustering of creative industries. In L. Lazzeretti (Ed.), Creative industries and innovation in Europe: Concepts, measures and comparative case studies. London: Routledge, 45–64.
Leydesdorff, L., Dolfsma, W., & Van der Panne, G. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among “technology, organization and territory”. Research Policy, 35(2), 181–199.
Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation system in Germany in terms of a triple helix dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1538–1553.
Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.
Machlup, F. (1962). The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Miles, I. (2001). Services innovation: A reconfiguration of innovation studies (PREST discussion paper series, 01-05). Manchester.
Miles, I., & Green, L. (2008). Hidden innovation in the creative industries. London: NESTA.
Müller, K., Rammer, C., & Trüby, J. (2009). The role of creative industries in industrial innovation. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 11, 148–168.
Müller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501–16 (Special issue).
O’Connor, J. (2007). The cultural and creative industries: A review of the literature. London: Arts Council England.
OECD. (1996). The knowledge based economy. Paris: OECD.
Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Potts, J., & Cunningham, S. (2008). Four models of the creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 14(3), 233–247.
Power, D., & Nielsén, T. (2010). Priority sector report: Creative and cultural industries. European Commission, Europe Innova-European Cluster Observatory.
Pratt, A. (2007). An economic geography of the cultural industries. In A. Leyson, L. McDowell, & R. Lee (Eds.), An economic geography reader. London: Sage.
Quah, D. (1996). Regional convergence clusters across Europe. European Economic Review, 40, 951–958.
Redondo-Cano, A., & Canet-Giner, M. T. (2010). Outsourcing agrochemical services: economic or strategic logic? Service Business, 4(3–4), 237–252.
Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.
Stoneman, P. (2009). Soft innovation: Towards a more complete picture of innovative change. London: NESTA.
Sunely, P., Pinch, S., Reimer, S., & Macmillen, J. (2008). Innovation in a creative production system: The case of design. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 675–698.
UNCTAD. (2010). Creative economy (Report 2010). Geneva/New York: UNDP-UNCTAD.
Wernerheim, C. M. (2010). The tendency of advanced services to co-locate and the implications for regional government policy. The Services Industries Journal, 30(5), 731–748.
Wood, P. (Ed.). (2002). Consultancy and innovation. London: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Ministry of Science and Innovation and Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain) for financially supporting this research (ECO2010-17318 MICINN Project and Research Project n. 2677-UPV). We also would like to thank an anonymous referee and Frank Pyke by their valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boix, R., De-Miguel-Molina, B., Hervas-Oliver, J.L. (2013). The Importance of Creative Services Firms in Explaining the Wealth of European Regions. In: Cuadrado-Roura, J. (eds) Service Industries and Regions. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35801-2_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35801-2_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35800-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35801-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)