A Comparative Evaluation of Gaussian Multiscale Aggregation for Hand Biometrics
The process of segmentation consists of dividing the image in regions with similar characteristics. In other words, segmentation is the partitioning of digital images into several regions, according to a given criteria . In addition, applying biometrics to daily scenarios involves difficult and challenging requirements in terms of software and hardware. On the contrary, current biometric techniques are also being adapted to present-day devices, like mobile phones, laptops and the like, which are considered to be unconstrained and contact-less. In fact, achieving a combination of both necessities is one of the most difficult problems at present in biometrics. Segmentation in these kind of environments require special effort and attention, since although there exist an obvious difficulty in providing accurate segmentation to these scenarios, the constraints in terms of software and hardware are important and affect the segmentation performance. Therefore, this paper presents a segmentation algorithm able to provide suitable solutions in terms of precision for hand biometric recognition, considering a wide range of backgrounds like carpets, glass, grass, mud, pavement, plastic, tiles or wood. Results highlight that segmentation accuracy is carried out with high rates of precision (F-measure≥ 88%), presenting competitive time results when compared to state-of-the-art segmentation algorithms time performance. Finally, the accuracy of the proposed method is compared to the performance of Normalized Cuts in terms of segmentation accuracy and time performance.
KeywordsImage Segmentation Segmentation Algorithm Segmentation Result Delaunay Triangulation Segmentation Evaluation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Alpert, S., Galun, M., Basri, R., Brandt, A.: Image segmentation by probabilistic bottom-up aggregation and cue integration. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2007, pp. 1–8 (June 2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Felzenszwalb, P.F., Huttenlocher, D.P.: Efficient graph-based image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision 59 (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1992)Google Scholar
- 6.Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
- 8.Kukula, E., Elliott, S.: Implementation of hand geometry at purdue university’s recreational center: an analysis of user perspectives and system performance. In: 39th Annual 2005 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, CCST 2005, November 14, pp. 83–88 (2005)Google Scholar
- 11.García-Casarrubios Muñoz, Á., Sánchez Ávila, C., de Santos Sierra, A., Guerra Casanova, J.: A Mobile-Oriented Hand Segmentation Algorithm Based on Fuzzy Multiscale Aggregation. In: Bebis, G., Boyle, R., Parvin, B., Koracin, D., Chung, R., Hammoud, R., Hussain, M., Kar-Han, T., Crawfis, R., Thalmann, D., Kao, D., Avila, L. (eds.) ISVC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6453, pp. 479–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Rory Tait Neilson, B. N., McDonald, S.: Image segmentation by weighted aggregation with gradient orientation histograms. Southern African Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference, SATNAC (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Sharon, E., Brandt, A., Basri, R.: Fast multiscale image segmentation. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 70–77 (2000)Google Scholar
- 14.Sharon, E., Brandt, A., Basri, R.: Segmentation and boundary detection using multiscale intensity measurements. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2001, vol. 1, pp. I–469 – I–476 (2001)Google Scholar
- 15.Sharon, E., Galun, M., Sharon, D., Basri, R., Brandt, A.: Hierarchy and adaptivity in segmenting visual scenes. Macmillan Publishing Ltd. (2006)Google Scholar
- 18.Shirakawa, S., Nagao, T.: Evolutionary image segmentation based on multiobjective clustering. In: CEC 2009: Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2466–2473. IEEE Press, Piscataway (2009)Google Scholar