Skip to main content

Normal Operators

  • Chapter
  • 2569 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 868))

Abstract

From Chap. 16 we know that self-adjoint operators are represented as arrows, from the state space \(\underline{\varSigma}\) to the quantity value object \(\underline {\mathbb {R}}^{\leftrightarrow}\). The natural question to ask is whether such a representation can be extended to all normal operators. To this end one needs to, first of all, define the topos analogue of the complex numbers. Of course there exists the trivial object \(\underline {\mathbb {C}}\) but this, as we will see, can not be identified with the complex number object since (a) it does not reduce to \(\underline {\mathbb {R}}^{\leftrightarrow}\), and (b) the presheaf maps in \(\underline {\mathbb {C}}\) are the identity maps which do not respect the ordering induced by the daseinisation of normal operators, yet to be defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The presheaf \(\underline {\mathbb {R}}\) is defined on each \(V\in \mathcal{V}(\mathcal{H})\) as \(\underline {\mathbb {R}}_{V}:=\mathbb {R}\) and given the maps i:V′⊆V then the respective presheaf morphisms are simply the identity maps. See Definition 20.9.

  2. 2.

    Recall that a local is essentially a frame (see Definition 17.1) but a morphisms between two locales is a morphisms between the frames which goes in the opposite direction.

  3. 3.

    Note that in this internal approach one is working with co-presheaves instead of presheaves.

  4. 4.

    A set P is directed if for any x,yP there exists a zP such that x,yz.

  5. 5.

    Here ⨆ indicates the supremum of a directed set and the relation xy indicates that x approximates y. In particular xy if, for any directed set S with a supremum, then y⊑⨆ S⇒∃sS:xs.

  6. 6.

    Here l([α,β] n ) represents the length of the largest side of the rectangle and thus is defined as l([α,β] n )=Max{|a n c n |,|b n d n |} where α=a+ib and β=c+id.

  7. 7.

    We recall that, given a poset 〈P,≤〉 a subset G is said to be Scott-open if (i) xGxyyG; (ii) for any directed set S with supremum then ⨆ SG⇒∃sS|sG. In other words all supremums in G have a non-empty intersection with G.

  8. 8.

    Given this topology then it is clear that, as topological spaces \(\mathbb {C}\simeq max\mathbf{I}\mathbb {C}\) where \(\mathbb {C}\) is equipped with the (general) open rectangles topology and \(max\mathbf{I}\mathbb {C}\) has the topology inherited by \(\mathbf{I}\mathbb {C}\). The homeomorphisms can be see by the fact that .

References

  1. S. MacLane, I. Moerdijk, Sheaves in Geometry and Logic: A First Introduction to Topos Theory (Springer, London, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Heunen, N.P. Landsman, B. Spitters, A topos for algebraic quantum theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 291, 63 (2009). arXiv:0709.4364 [quant-ph]

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. W. Brenna, C. Flori, Complex numbers and normal operators in topos quantum theory. arXiv:1206.0809 [quant-ph]

  4. G. Helmberg, Introduction to Spectral Theory in Hilbert Space (Dover Publications, New York, 2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Whitley, The spectral theorem for a normal operator. Am. Math. Mon. 75, 856–861 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. H.F. de Groote, On a canonical lattice structure on the effect algebra of a von Neumann algebra (2007). arXiv:math-ph/0410018

  7. B. Banaschewski, C.J. Mulvey, The spectral theory of commutative C -algebras: the constructive spectrum. Quaest. Math. 23, 4 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Banaschewski, C.J. Mulvey, A globalisation of the Gelfand duality theorem. Ann. Pure Appl. Log., vol. 137 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. Rousseau, Topos theory and complex analysis, in Applications of Sheaves. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 753 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Doering, B. Dewitt, Self-adjoint operators as functions I (2012). arXiv:1208.4724v1 [math-ph]

  11. A. Doering, R.S. Barbosa, Unsharp values, domains and topoi (2011). arXiv:1107.1083v1 [quant-ph]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flori, C. (2013). Normal Operators. In: A First Course in Topos Quantum Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 868. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35713-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics