Advertisement

Good Intentions, Bad Results: The Effects of Newspaper Subsidies on Journalistic Quality

  • Christian M. WellbrockEmail author
  • Martin A. Leroch
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

News media play an irreplaceably important role in the successful working of democratic societies: they guarantee that citizens have access to information, are accurately informed, and actively take part in the political process. A crucial factor for the effective fulfillment of these democratic functions is an adequate level of journalistic quality.

Keywords

Consumption Capital Profit Function Marginal Return Regional Newspaper Marginal Revenue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank David Waterman, Paul Murschetz, Matthew Braham, and two anonymous referees for valuable comments and advice on earlier versions of this paper.

This contribution is based on Leroch and Wellbrock (2011). Saving Newspapers with Public Grants—The Effect of Press Subsidies on the Provision of Journalistic Quality. Information Economics and Policy, 23, 281–286. Permission to reuse is granted by Elsevier

References

  1. Anderson, S. P., & Gabszewicz, J. J. (2006). The media and advertising: A tale of two-sided markets. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 567–614). Amsterdam: North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G. S., & Stigler, G. J. (1977). De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review, 67, 76–90.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, R. D., & Romano, R. E. (1993). Pricing decisions of the newspaper monopolist. Southern Economic Journal, 59, 721–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Corden, W. M. (1953). The maximization of profit by a newspaper. Review of Economic Studies, 20, 181–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crampes, C., Haritchabalet, C., & Jullien, B. (2009). Advertising, competition and entry in media industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 57, 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewenter, R. (2003). Media markets with habit formation. Diskussionspapier (Fächergruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre No. 5). Hamburg: Helmut-Schmidt-Universität. Accessed February 16, 2011, from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:705-opus-1332
  7. Mantrala, M. K., Naik, P. A., Sridhar, S., & Thorson, E. (2007). Uphill or downhill? Locating the firm on a profit function. Journal of Marketing, 71, 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Maskin, E., & Riley, J. (1984). Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND Journal of Economics, 15, 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and quality distortions. Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Owen, B. M., & Wildman, S. S. (1992). Video economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Peitz, M., & Valletti, T. (2008). Content and advertising in the media: pay-tv versus free-to-air. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26, 949–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sonnac, N. (2000). Readers’ attitudes toward press advertising: Are they ad-lovers or ad-averse? Journal of Media Economics, 13, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Spence, M. (1975). Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, 6, 417–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Spence, M., & Owen, B. (1977). Television programming, monopolistic competition, and welfare. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tag, J. (2009). Paying to remove advertisements. Information Economics and Policy, 21, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wellbrock, C. (2011). Die journalistische Qualität deutscher Tageszeitungen – ein ranking. Medienwirtschaft, 8, 22–31.Google Scholar
  17. Westerstahl, J. (1983). Objective news reporting. Communication Research, 10, 403–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HamburgHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Politics and EconomicsJohannes-Gutenberg-Universität MainzMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations