State Aid for Newspapers: First Theoretical Disputes

  • Paul MurschetzEmail author
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)


If one first lays aside any definitional problems—the term state aid is used within the European Union, and the term subsidies the standard expression of the World Trade Organization, while the OECD prefers to use the word support—state aid, at a very fundamental level, commonly refers to a cash payment or financial assistance from a government or other public authority to a person or company. State aid for newspapers, more particularly, usually serves two main purposes: They should reduce a person’s or company’s cost of producing and bringing a commodity to market, and, secondly, by reducing the price of the commodity, should increase its consumption beyond what competitive market forces would provide for.


Market Failure Government Subsidy Public Subsidy Business Model Innovation Subsidy Effect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahrend, R. (2002, February). Press freedom, human capital and corruption (DELTA Working Paper No. 2002-11). Accessed January 3, 2013, from
  2. Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for lemons. Qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bain, J. S. (1956). Barriers to new competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding regulation. Theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (Eds.). (2010). The oxford handbook of regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72, 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumol, W., & Willig, R. (1981). Fixed costs, sunk costs, entry barriers and sustainability of monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 96, 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertrand, J. L. F. (1883). Théorie Mathématique de la Richesse Sociale, Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses. Journal de Savants, 67, 499–508.Google Scholar
  10. Blair, R. D., & Romano, R. E. (1993). Pricing decisions of the newspaper monopolist. Southern Economic Journal, 54, 721–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7), 1801–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchanan, J. M., Tollison, R. D., & Tullock, G. (Eds.). (1980). Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
  13. Carmichael, F. (2005). A guide to game theory. Hallow, England: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
  14. Chamberlin, E. H. (1962/1933). The theory of monopolistic competition (8th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coase, R. H. (1974). The market for goods and the market for ideas. American Economic Review, 64, 384–391.Google Scholar
  17. Congleton, R., Hillman, A. L., & Konrad, K. (Eds.). (2008). 40 years of rent-seeking research. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Cowen, T. (1988). The theory of market failure. A critical examination. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cowen, T., & Crampton, E. (2002). Market failure or success. The new debate. Cheltenham: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dal Bó, E. (2006). Regulatory capture. A review. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(2), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daughety, A. F., & Reinganum, J. R. (2008). Imperfect competition and quality signaling. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(1), 163–183.Google Scholar
  22. Demsetz, H. (1982). Barriers to entry. The American Economic Review, 72(1), 47–57.Google Scholar
  23. Fuldenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (1991). Game theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gabszewicz, J. J., Laussel, D., & Sonnac, N. (2005). Press industry and the political differentiation of newspapers. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 4(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gehlbach, S., & Sonin, K. (2011). Government control of the media. Accessed April 3, 2013, from
  26. Gustafsson, K. E. (1993). Government policies to reduce newspaper entry barriers. The Journal of Media Economics, 6(1), 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hantke-Domas, M. (2003). The public interest theory of regulation: Non-existence or misinterpretation. European Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 165–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Heinrich, J. (1984). Marktzutritt als Systemelement des Wettbewerbs. In G. G. Kopper & G. Gerd (Eds.), Marktzutritt bei Tageszeitungen—Zur Sicherung von Meinungsvielfalt durch Wettbewerb (pp. 75–86). München: Saur.Google Scholar
  29. Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jung, J. (2003). Measuring the financial health of media firms: The bigger, the better? The International Journal of Media Management, 5(4), 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kornai, J. E. (1986). The soft budget constraint. Kyklos, 39(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kornai, J. E., Maskin, E., & Roland, G. (2003). Understanding the soft budget constraint. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1095–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lacy, S. (1992). The financial commitment approach to news media competition. Journal of Media Economics, 5(2), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lacy, S. (1993). Understanding & serving readers: The problems of fuzzy market structure. Newspaper Research Journal, 14(2), 55–67.Google Scholar
  36. Lacy, S. (2004). Fuzzy market structure and differentiation: One size does not fit all. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), Strategic responses to media market changes (pp. 83–95). Jonköping, Sweden: Media Management and Transformation Centre.Google Scholar
  37. Laffont, J.-J., & Tirole, J. (1991). The politics of government decision-making: A theory of regulatory capture. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1089–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2005). Transparency and corruption. The conditional significance of a free press (QOG Working Paper Series: 5). Göteborg University. Accessed April 3, 2013, from
  39. Ludwig, J. (2000). The essential economic problem of the media: Working between market failure and cross-financing. Journal of Media Economics, 13(3), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McChesney, R. W. (2008). The political economy of the media. Enduring issues, emerging dilemmas. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  41. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.Google Scholar
  42. Murschetz, P. (2008). Theory of market failure. In C. Scholz, & U. Eisenbeis (Eds.), Looking to the future of modern media management. Changes—Challenges—Opportunities (IMMAA Report 2007/2008, pp. 59–65). Lisbon: MediaXXI.Google Scholar
  43. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Musgrave, R. A. (2008). Merit goods. In S. N. Durlauf, & L. E. Blume (Eds.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics (2nd ed). London: Palgrave Macmillan (April 9, 2013). Accessed 3 January 2013, from, doi: 10.1057/9780230226203.1089
  45. Musgrave, R. A., & Peacock, A. T. (1958). Classics in the theory of public finance. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Myers, S. C. (1984). The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance, 39, 575–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers, S. C. (2000). The capital structure. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 81–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nielsen, R. K., & Linnebank, G. (2011). Public support for the media: A six-country overview of direct and indirect subsidies. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar
  50. OECD—Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2010). Roundtable on competition, state aids and subsidies. DAF/COMP/GF(2010)5. Accessed March 10, 2011, from
  51. Office of Fair Trading—OFT. (2004). Public subsidies. A report by the Office of Fair Trading, prepared by Frontier Economics, OFT London (OFT750).Google Scholar
  52. Office of Fair Trading—OFT. (2006). UK guidance on how to assess the competition effects of subsidies. A report by the Office of Fair Trading, prepared by Nera Economic Consulting, London (OFT 829 by Nera Economic Consulting).Google Scholar
  53. Ozanich, G. W. (2006). Media finance and evaluation. In A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 601–621). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  54. Pareto, V. (1971/1927). Manual of political economy. (1971 translation of 1927 edition). New York: Augustus M. Kelley.Google Scholar
  55. Peltzman, S. (1973). The effect of government subsidies-in-kind on private expenditures: The case of higher education. Journal of Political Economy, 81(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 211–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pfeffer, G., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  58. Picard, R. G. (1982). State intervention in U.S. Press Economics. Gazette, 30, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Picard, R. G. (1985). Patterns of state intervention in Western Press Economics. Journalism Quarterly, 62, 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Picard, R. G. (1991, October 4–5). Competitive effects of state press policies. An analytical framework for policy proposals, paper presented to the ‘political economy vs. media economics’ workshop of the economy and future of print media research program, University of Salzburg.Google Scholar
  61. Picard, R. G. (2004). Commercialism and newspaper quality. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(1), 54–65.Google Scholar
  62. Picard, R. G. (2006). Issues and challenges in the provision of press subsidies. In I. Fernandez Alonso, M. de Moragas, J. J. Blasco Gil, & N. Almiron (Eds.), Press subsidies in Europe (pp. 211–220). Barcelona: Generalitat de Catalunya.Google Scholar
  63. Picard, R. G. (2008). Subsidies for the Media. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 4891–4894). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. Picard, R. G. (2011). the economics and financing of media companies (2nd ed.). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Picard, R. G., & Brody, J. H. (1997). The newspaper publishing industry. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  66. Pigou, A. C. (1932/1920). The economics of welfare (4th ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  67. Posner, R. A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(2), 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Prat, A., & Strömberg, D. (2011). The political economy of mass media. London: Mimeo, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  69. Rasmusen, E. (2007). Games and information: An introduction to game theory (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  70. Reddaway, W. B. (1963). The economics of newspapers. The Economic Journal, 73, 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reder, M. W. (1982). Chicago economics: permanence and change. Journal of Economic Literature, 20(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
  72. Rizzuto, R. J. (2006). Issues in financial management. In A. B. Albarran, S. M. Chan-Olmsted, & M. O. Wirth (Eds.), Handbook of media management and economics (pp. 145–161). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  73. Robinson, J. (1933). The economics of imperfect competition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Rochet, J.-C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Roson, R. (2005). Two-sided markets: A tentative survey. Review of Network Economics, 4(2), 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ross, T. W. (1988). On the relative efficiency of cash transfers and subsidies (Working Paper in Economics E-88-20). The Hoover Institution, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  77. Rosse, J. N. (1967). Daily newspapers, monopolistic competition, and economies of scale. American Economic Review, 57, 522–533.Google Scholar
  78. Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Seabright, P., & von Hagen, J. (2007). The economic regulation of broadcasting markets. Evolving technology and challenges for policy. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Steenblik, R. P. (1990). A subsidy primer. Accessed September 8, 2012, from
  81. Steenblik, R. P. (2003). Subsidy measurement and classification: Developing a common framework. In OECD (Ed.), Environmentally harmful subsidies: Policy issues and challenges (pp. 101–141). Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  82. Stigler, G. J. (1968). Barrier to entry, economies of scale, and firm size. In G. J. Stigler (Ed.), The organization of industry (pp. 67–70). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.Google Scholar
  83. Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stigler, G. J. (1988). Chicago studies in political economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  85. Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). On the economic role of the state. In A. Heertje (Ed.), The economic role of the state (pp. 9–85). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  86. Strömberg, D. (2004). Mass media competition, political competition, and public policy. Review of Economic Studies, 71, 265–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Truffy, V. (2011). Aides à la presse: 1 milliard d’euros pour la presse papier, 20 millions pour Internet. Accessed December 12, 2012, from
  88. Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft. Western Economic Journal, 5(June), 224–232.Google Scholar
  89. Tullock, G. (1987). Rent seeking. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new palgrave: A dictionary of economics (Vol. 4, pp. 147–149). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  90. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 31–48.Google Scholar
  91. Vining, A. R. (2003). Internal market failure: A framework for diagnosing firm inefficiency. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. von Weizsäcker, C. C. (1980). Barriers to entry. A theoretical treatment. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Waterman, D. (1991). Diversity and quality of information products in a monopolistically competitive industry. Information Economics and Policy, 4, 291–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction cost economics. The governance of contractual relations. Journal of law and Economics, 22, 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zaller, J. (1999). Market competition and news quality. Paper prepared for presentation at the 1999 annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA. Accessed November 5, 2012, from
  96. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zerbe, R. O., Jr., & McCurdy, H. E. (1999). The failure of market failure. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18, 558–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICT&S CenterUniversity of SalzburgSalzburgAustria

Personalised recommendations