Advertisement

The Netherlands: Initiatives to Subsidise Press Innovation

  • Lou LichtenbergEmail author
  • Leen d’Haenens
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

Driven by financial pressures, and challenged by rapid technological changes, unpredictable consumer markets, and shortened product life cycles, news media company executives have to be determined to further streamline their operations and stimulate innovation processes, while also looking for ways to make the most money out of their existing product lines. According to early innovation theories, the greater the turbulence and change within an industry, the greater the market opportunities, and the more one should open up one’s horizons to the outside world (e.g. Dean et al. 1993; Utterback 1994). One proven method of creating innovation is by internalising external knowledge (Weerawardena et al. 2006; Hagedoorn 2002; Capron and Mitchell 2004). Moreover, such forms of collaboration help reduce or share the innovation costs (Chesbrough 2007; Sakakibara 2003).

Keywords

Support Measure Information Supply Editorial Staff Regional News Daily Press 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bedrijfsfonds voor de Pers (Dutch Press Fund). (2004). Van vangnet naar springplank: Advies aan de staatssecretaris van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap over de regionale en lokale informatievoorziening via de pers [From safety-net to stepping-stone: Policy advice to the Secretary of State for Education, Culture and Science about the regional information provision by the press]. The Hague: Bedrijfsfonds voor de Pers (R8).Google Scholar
  2. Capron, L., & Mitchell, W. (2004). Where firms change: Internal development versus external capability sourcing in the global telecommunications industry. European Management Review, 1, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chesbrough, H. W. (2007). Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(2), 21–28.Google Scholar
  4. Dal Zotto, C., & Van Kranenburg, H. (Eds.). (2008). Management and innovation in the media industry. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  5. Dean, T. J., Meyer, G. D., & Decastro, J. (1993). Determinants of new-firm formations in manufacturing industries: Industry dynamics, entry barriers, and organizational inertia. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 17(2), 49–59.Google Scholar
  6. Hagedoorn, J. (2002). Interfirm R&D-partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy, 31, 477–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. KPGM BEA. (2004). Regionale dagbladen in economisch perspectief [Regional newspapers from an economic perspective]. Amstelveen: Bedrijfsfonds voor de Pers.Google Scholar
  8. Kramp, L., & Weichert, S. (2012). Innovationsreport Journalismus. Ökonomische, Medienpolitische und Handwerkliche Faktoren im Wandel. Bonn: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
  9. Lichtenberg, L. (1995). The Dutch model of press policy. In K. E. Gustafsson (Ed.), Media structure and the state. Concepts, issues, measures (pp. 114–132). Proceedings from an International Symposium, Göteborg University, Sweden, May 9–10, 1994, arranged for and financed by The 1994 Committee of the Press. Göteborg: Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  10. Lichtenberg, L. (1996). The future position of the graphics industry in the electronic age. In Printed media in transition (pp. 37–59). Proceedings of the Seminar on Growth, Profitability and Productivity of the European Graphic Arts Industry in Zürich, Switzerland, November 1995. Turku, Finland: The Economic Research Foundation for Mass Communication, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
  11. Lichtenberg, L. (1998). Interactive electronic media: ‘Spielerei’ or serious alternatives for the printed word? In R. G. Picard (Ed.), Evolving media markets: Effects of economic and policy changes (pp. 143–159). Turku: The Economic Research Foundation for Mass Communication, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration.Google Scholar
  12. Lichtenberg, L. (1999). Influences of electronic developments on the role of editors and publishers. The International Journal on Media Management, 1(1), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lichtenberg, L. (2005). Dilemma’s in het persbeleid van de overheid. Bijdragen over de dilemma’s in de zorgplicht van de overheid voor pluriformiteit in de informatievoorziening, in het bijzonder via de pers in Nederland [Dilemmas in Dutch press policy] (Doctoral dissertation). The Hague.Google Scholar
  14. Lichtenberg, L. (2008a). Press concentration, convergence and innovation: Europe in search of a new communications policy. Central European Journal of Communication, 1(1), 49–61.Google Scholar
  15. Lichtenberg, L. (2008b). Instruments for press policy in The Netherlands. In O. Hultén, S. Tjernström, & S. Melesko (Eds.), Media mergers and the defence of pluralism (pp. 133–142). Göteborg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  16. Lichtenberg, L. (2009). Press and press support in The Netherlands. Innovation in the press industry and the right of information. In The Netherlands Press Fund (Ed.), Press and press support in a digital age (pp. 162–171). Papers of the International Conference, hosted by The Netherlands Press Fund, The Hague. Diemen: AMB.Google Scholar
  17. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap [Ministry of Education, Culture & Science]. (2008a). Persbrief November 14 [Policy letter to the parliament on (broad) press policy]. Tweede Kamer [House of Representatives], sessions 2008–2009, 31777 nr. 1. The Hague.Google Scholar
  18. Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap [Ministry of Education, Culture & Science]. (2008b). Brief aan de Tweede Kamer d.d. 12 december 2008 [letter in which a research for lower rates for taxes and the creation of an Temporary Innovation Commission for the Press were announced]. Tweede Kamer [House of Representatives], sessions 2008–2009, 31777 nr. 2. The Hague.Google Scholar
  19. Rutte, M., & Samsom, D. (2012). Bruggen slaan. Regeerakkoord VVD-PvdA [Building bridges, coalition agreement VVD-PvdA]. Bureau woordvoering kabinetsformatie 2012. Accessed September 7, 2012, from http://www.kabinetsformatie2012.nl/actueel/documenten/regeerakkoord.html
  20. Sakakibara, M. (2003). Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stimuleringsfonds voor de Pers [Dutch Press Fund]. (2007). De krant doorgeklikt. Innovatie en transformatie in de dagbladpers [Clicking the newspaper. Innovations and transformation in the daily press]. Rapporten Stimuleringsfonds voor de Pers – R7. Diemen: AMB.Google Scholar
  22. Stimuleringsfonds voor de Pers [Dutch Press Fund]. (2008, August 28). Advies Persbeleid [Advice memorandum on press policy]. Stimuleringsfonds voor de Pers – R10. Diemen: AMB. Also published as a supplement of the policy letter to the Parliament, House of Representatives, session 2008–2009, 31777 nr. 1.Google Scholar
  23. Stimuleringsfonds voor de Pers [Dutch Press Fund]. (2012). Jaarverslag over 2011 [Annual report 2011]. The Hague: Stimuleringsfonds voor de Pers.Google Scholar
  24. Stone, M., Nel, F., McBride Mensching, L., & Lin, E. (2012). World newsmedia innovation study 2012. Chicago, IL: The World Newsmedia Network. Accessed March 3, 2013, from http://www.wnmn.org.Google Scholar
  25. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation. Integrating technological, market and organisational change (3rd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Tijdelijke Commissie Innovatie en Toekomst Pers [The Brinkmann Commission - Temporary Commission on Innovation and Future of the Press]. (2009, June 23). De volgende editie. Adviesrapport Tijdelijke Commissie Innovatie en Toekomst Pers [The next edition. Advisory report]. The Hague.Google Scholar
  27. Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  28. Weerawardena, J., O’Cass, A., & Craig, J. (2006). Does industry matter? Examining the role of industry structure and organizational learning in innovation and brand performance. Journal of Business Research, 59, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stimuleringsfonds voor de Pers (The Netherlands Press Fund)The HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Media Studies KU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Radboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations