Advertisement

Belgium: Big Changes in a Small News Economy

  • Ike PiconeEmail author
  • Caroline Pauwels
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

For some time now, the news sector is believed to be in a period of deap-seated change (Preston 2009), the drivers of which are a continuously dropping audience, an evolution towards free news, failing alternative revenue models, a slow migration of advertisers to the online medium reinforced by the current economic crisis and changes in the news production process and changing patterns of news use [Preston 2009; see also Bruns (2008), Meikle and Redden (2010), Picard (2010), Heinonen (2011)].

Keywords

Innovation Policy Media Innovation Press Sector Innovation Support Public Service Broadcaster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ballon, P., Donders, K., Evens, T., Bannier, S., & Rucic, H. (2010). Naar een Ecosysteem-Model voor Onderzoek en Innovatie rond Audiovisuele Consumptie in Vlaanderen. Deliverable I: Scopebepaling, omgevingsanalyse en archetypische modellen voor innovatie in Vlaanderen [Towards an ecosystem model vor research and innovation for audiovisual consumption in Flanders. Deliverable 1: Definition of scope, landscape analysis and archetype models for innovation in Flanders]. Brussels: iMinds/SMIT.Google Scholar
  2. Bhagwati, J. (1989). Protectionism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blanchard, J. L. (2006). Aid to the Written Press in the French Community of Belgium. In I. Fernández Alonso, M. de Moragas, J. J. Blasco Gil, & N. Almiron (Eds.), Press subsidies in Europe, Catalunya. Generalitat III (pp. 94–99). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Institut de la Comunicació IV.Google Scholar
  4. Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bruns, A. (2008). Life beyond the public sphere: Towards a networked model for political deliberation. Information Polity, 13(1–2), 71–85.Google Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/46/35
  7. Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: A new paradigm for understanding industrial innovation. In H. W. Chesbourgh, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. De Bens, E. (2009). The Belgian case. The role of the government in safeguarding the quality and pluralism of the press. In The Authors and the Netherlands Press Fund (Eds.), Press and press support in a digital age. International conference on press and press support in a digital age, 3–4 October 2007 (pp. 65–72). The Hague: AMB Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Filloux, F. (2012). Murdoch’s the daily won’t take off. The Guardian Online. Accessed October 3, 2012, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jul/16/the-daily-rupert-murdoch
  12. Fischer, J. (2012). Sweet fruit or poisoned apple? The iPad's effect on newspapers. Journal on Telecommunications and High Technology Law, 10(1), 173–197. Accessed October 3, 2012, from http://jthtl.org/content/articles/V10I1/JTHTLv10i1_JFischer.PDF Google Scholar
  13. Flanders in Action (2012). About ViA. Accessed May 26, 2013, from http://www.vlaandereninactie.be/en/about
  14. Heinonen, A. (2011). The journalist’s relationship with users. New dimensions to conventional roles. In J. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.), Participatory journalism. Guarding open gates at online newspapers (pp. 34–55). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leroch, M. A., & Wellbrock, C. M. (2011). Saving newspapers with public grants. The effects of press subsidies on the provision of journalistic quality. Information Economics and Policy, 23(3/4), 281–286. doi: 10.1016/j.infoecopol.2011.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mantrala, M. K., Naik, P. A., Sridhar, S., & Thorson, E. (2007). Uphill or downhill? Locating the firm on a profit function. Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 26–44. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.71.2.26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McKercher, C. (2002). Newsworkers unite: Labor, convergence, and North American Newspapers. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Meikle, G., & Redden, G. (2010). News online: Transformations and continuities. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Meikle, G., & Young, S. (2012). Media convergence: Networked digital media in everyday life. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan Limited.Google Scholar
  20. Musschoot, I., & Lombaerts, B. (2008). Media in bewegin. Handboek voor de professional [Media in Motion. Handbook for the Professional]. Leuven: LannooCampus.Google Scholar
  21. NBB (2012). Balanscentrale Nationale Bank van België. Toepassing “Jaarrekeningen online raadplegen”. Accessed September 14, 2012, from http://www.nbb.be/pub
  22. Paulussen, S., Geens, D., & Vandenbrande, K. (2011). Fostering a culture of collaboration. Organizational challenges of newsroom innovation. In D. Domingo & C. Paterson (Eds.), Making online news. Newsroom ethnography in the second decade of internet journalism (pp. 4–14). New York, NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  23. Pavlik, J. V. (2011). Digital technology and journalism: Implications for democracy. Brazilian Journalism Research, 7(2), 95–116. Accessed October 26, 2012, from http://bjr.sbpjor.org.br/bjr/article/view/354/330
  24. Picard, R. G. (2010). Value creation and the future of news organizations: Why and how journalism must change to remain relevant in the twenty-first century. Lisbon: Media XXI.Google Scholar
  25. Preston, P. (2009). New times, new news paradigms? In P. Preston (Ed.), Making the news: Journalism and news cultures in Europe (pp. 162–178). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Quinn, S. (2002). Knowledge management in the digital newsroom. Oxford: Focal Press.Google Scholar
  27. Raeymaeckers, K., De Bens, E., Paulussen, S., Deprez, A., & Tenret, Y. (2007a). Belgium. In European Journalism Centre (Ed.), Media landscapes. Accessed March 3, 2013, from http://ejc.net/media_landscapes/belgium
  28. Raeymaeckers, K., Hauttekeete, L., & Deprez, A. (2007b). To read or not to read. Can policy support the future reader market? European Journal of Communication, 22(1), 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. (1996). Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In R. Mansell & R. Silverstone (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 44–74). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Vlaanderen in Actie (2013). Economie. Accessed May 20, 2013, from http://www.vlaandereninactie.be/over/economie
  31. Vujnovic, M. (2011). Participatory journalism in the marketplace: Economic motivations behind the practices. In J. Singer, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, A. Heinonen, S. Paulussen, T. Quandt, Z. Reich, & M. Vujnovic (Eds.), Participatory journalism. Guarding open gates at online newspapers (pp. 139–154). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Westerstahl, J. (1983). Objective news reporting. Communication Research, 10, 403–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.iMinds-SMITVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Brussels Platform for JournalismVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations