Skip to main content

A Quantum Model for the Ellsberg and Machina Paradoxes

  • Conference paper
Quantum Interaction (QI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7620))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Ellsberg and Machina paradoxes reveal that expected utility theory is problematical when real subjects take decisions under uncertainty. Suitable generalizations of expected utility exist which attempt to solve the Ellsberg paradox, but none of them provides a satisfactory solution of the Machina paradox. In this paper we elaborate a quantum model in Hilbert space describing the Ellsberg situation and also the Machina situation, and show that we can model the specific aspect of the Machina situation that is unable to be modeled within the existing generalizations of expected utility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1944)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellsberg, D.: Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms. Quart. J. Econ. 75(4), 643–669 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Machina, M.J.: Risk, Ambiguity, and the Dark–dependence Axioms. Am. Econ. Rev. 99(1), 385–392 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Knight, F.H.: Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1921)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilboa, I.: Expected Utility with Purely Subjective Non-additive Probabilities. J. Math. Econ. 16, 65–88 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: Maxmin Expected Utility With Non–unique Prior. J. Math. Econ. 18, 141–153 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Maccheroni, F., Marinacci, M., Rustichini, A.: Dynamical Variational Preferences. The Carlo Alberto Notebooks 1, 37 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., Mukerji, S.: A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73(6), 1849–1892 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein, L.G.: A Definition of Uncertainty Aversion. Rev. Econ. Stud. 66, 579–608 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Baillon, A., L’Haridon, O., Placido, L.: Ambiguity Models and the Machina Paradoxes. Am. Econ. rev. 101(4), 1547–1560 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., Czachor, M., D’Hooghe, B.: A Quantum-Conceptual Explanation of Violations of Expected Utility in Economics. In: Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds.) QI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7052, pp. 192–198. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Aerts, D., D’Hooghe, B., Sozzo, S.: A Quantum Cognition Analysis of the Ellsberg Paradox. In: Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds.) QI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7052, pp. 95–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S.: Quantum Structure in Economics: The Ellsberg Paradox. In: D’Ariano, M., et al. (eds.) Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations, vol. 6, pp. 487–494. AIP, Melville (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S.: Contextual Risk and Its Relevance in Economics; A Contextual Risk Model for the Ellsberg Paradox. J. Eng. Sci. Tech. Rev. 4, 241–245, 246–250 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Camerer, C.F.: Ambiguity Aversion and Non–additive Probability: Experimental Evidence, Models and Applications. In: Luini, L. (ed.) Uncertain Decisions: Bridging Theory and Experiments, pp. 53–80. Kluwer Acad. Pub., Dordrecht (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Aerts, D.: Quantum Structure in Cognition. J. Math. Psych. 53, 314–348 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Busemeyer, J.R., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: An Exploration of Type Indeterminacy in Strategic Decision-Making. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.) QI 2009. LNCS, vol. 5494, pp. 113–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aerts, D., Sozzo, S., Tapia, J. (2012). A Quantum Model for the Ellsberg and Machina Paradoxes. In: Busemeyer, J.R., Dubois, F., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Melucci, M. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7620. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35659-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35659-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35658-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35659-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics