Skip to main content

Quantum-Like Representation of Irrational Inference

  • Conference paper
Quantum Interaction (QI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7620))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we develop a general quantum-like representation of decision making. Here quantum-like representation is based on linear algebra, the von Neumann-Lüders projection postulate, Born’s rule, and the quantum representation of the state space of a composite system by the tensor product. Our approach generalizes in a natural way the classical Bayesian inference and explains irrational (non-Bayesian) inference biased by psychological factors. For the mathematical description of irrational inference, we use the lifting map, which is important concept to discuss a general quantum dynamics called adaptive dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Accardi, L., Ohya, M.: Compound channels, transition expectations and liftings. Applied Mathematics Optimization 39, 33–59 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Accardi, L., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M.: Quantum Markov model for data from Shafir-Tversky experiments in cognitive psychology. Open Systems and Information Dynamics 16, 371–385 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Asano, M., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M.: Quantum-like model for decision making process in two players game, A Non-Kolmogorovian model. Found. Phys. 41, 538–548 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Asano, M., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I.: On application of Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad equation in cognitive psychology. Open Systems & Information Dynamics 18(1), 55–69 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Asano, M., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I.: Quantum-like Representation of Bayesian Updating. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Quantum Theory. American Institute of physics, vol. 1327, pp. 57–62 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Asano, M., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Khrennikov, A., Basieva, I.: Quantum-like Dynamics of Decision-Making. Physica A (2011), doi:10.1016

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bar-Hillel, M.: The base rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica 44, 211–233 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Busemeyer, J.R., Wang, Z., Townsend, J.T.: Quantum dynamics of human decision making. J. Math. Psychology 50, 220–241 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Busemeyer, J.R., Wang, Z., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Empirical Comparison of Markov and quantum models of decision making. J. Math. Psychology 53, 423–433 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Busemeyer, J.R., Trueblood, J.: Comparison of Quantum and Bayesian Inference Models. In: Bruza, P., Sofge, D., Lawless, W., van Rijsbergen, K., Klusch, M. (eds.) QI 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5494, pp. 29–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Busemeyer, J.R., Pothos, E.M., Franco, R., Trueblood, J.S.: A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Psychological Review 118, 193–218 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cheon, T., Takahashi, T.: Classical and quantum contents of solvable game theory on Hilbert space. Phys. Lett. A 348, 147–152 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheon, T., Takahashi, T.: Interference and inequality in quantum decision theory. Phys. Lett. A 375, 100–104 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Conte, E., Khrennikov, A., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Zbilut, J.P.: Mental states follow quantum mechanics during perception and cognition of ambiguous figures. Open Systems and Information Dynamics 16, 1–17 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Conte, E., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Vitiello, F., Lopane, M., Khrennikov, A., Zbilut, J.P.: Some remarks on an experiment suggesting quantum-like behavior of cognitive entities and formulation of an abstract quantum mechanical formalism to describe cognitive entity and its dynamics. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 31(5), 1076–1088 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Croson, R.: The Disjunction Effect and Reason-Based Choice in Games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 80, 118–133 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Danilov, V.I., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Measurable systems and behavioral sciences. Mathematical Social Sciences 55(3), 315–340 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Danilov, V.I., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A.: Expected utility theory under non-classical uncertainty. Theory and Decision 68(1), 25–47 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Dawes, R.M., Mirels, H.L., Gold, E., Schiavo, M.D.: Equating inverse probabilities in implicit personality judgments. Psychological Science 4, 396–400 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Franco, R.: The inverse fallacy and quantum formalism. In: Proceedings of the the Second Interaction Symposium (QI 2008), pp. 94–98 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Franco, R.: The conjunction fallacy and interference effects. J. Math. Psychol. 53, 415–422 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hamm, R.M.: Explanation for common responses to the blue/green cab probabilistic inference word problem. Psychological Reports 72, 219–242 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology 3, 430–454 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80, 237–251 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khrennikov, A.: Classical and quantum mechanics on information spaces with applications to cognitive, psychological, social and anomalous phenomena. Found. of Physics 29, 1065–1098 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Khrennikov, A.: On quantum-like probabilistic structure of mental information. Open Systems and Information Dynamics 11(3), 267–275 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Khrennikov, A.: Quantum-like brain: Interference of minds. BioSystems 84, 225–241 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khrennikov, A., Haven, E.: Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: the use of probability interference and other concepts. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 53, 378–388 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Khrennikov, A.: Quantum-like model of cognitive decision making and information processing. Biosystems 95, 179–187 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Khrennikov, A.: Contextual approach to quantum formalism. Fundamental Theories of Physics. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Khrennikov, A.: Ubiquitous quantum structure: from psychology to finance. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Koehler, J.J.: The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, 1–53 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Zamir, S., Zwirn, H.: Type Indeterminancy: A model of the KT (Kahneman-Tversky)-man. J. Math. Psychol. 53(5), 349–361 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Ohya, M.: Adaptive Dynamics and its Applications to Chaos and NPC Problem. In: QP-PQ: Quantum Probability and White Noise Analysis, Quantum Bio-Informatics 2007, vol. 21, pp. 181–216 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ohya, M., Volovich, I.: Mathematical foundations of quantum information and computation and its applications to nano- and bio-systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Pollard, P., St Evans, J.B.T.: The role of representativeness in statistical inference. In: St Evans, J.B.T. (ed.) Thinking and Reasoning, pp. 309–330. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pothos, E.M., Busemeyer, J.R.: A quantum probability explanation for violation of rational decision theory. Proc. Royal. Soc. B 276, 2171–2178 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shafir, E., Tversky, A.: Thinking through uncertainty: nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology 24, 449–474 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tversky, A., Shafir, E.: The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science 3, 305–309 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Villejoubert, G., Mandel, D.: The inverse fallacy: An account of deviations from Bayes’s theorem and the additivity principle. Memory and Cognition 30(2), 171–178 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wolfe, C.R.: Information seeking on Bayesian conditional probability problems: A fuzzy-trace theory account. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8, 85–108 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asano, M., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y. (2012). Quantum-Like Representation of Irrational Inference. In: Busemeyer, J.R., Dubois, F., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Melucci, M. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7620. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35659-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35659-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35658-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35659-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics