Abstract
Total hip replacement (THR) is well established as the most successful surgical procedure for the long-term alleviation of pain and disability in patients with arthritis of the hip joint (Learmonth et al. 2007). A total of 68,907 primary hip replacements were performed in England and Wales during 2010 (National Joint Registry 2011). In recent times metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings for THR have gradually been reintroduced, mainly because of the substantially lower wear rates compared to that of metal-on-polyethylene articulations and the decreased wear rates with increasing head diameters (Fisher et al. 2006). This has subsequently led to a resurgence of MoM hip resurfacing in young and active patients with hip arthritis (Amstutz et al. 2004; Treacy et al. 2011). Hip resurfacing has the added advantages of femoral bone preservation and the potential ease of future revision (Ball et al. 2007; Matharu et al. 2012a). In carefully selected patients excellent medium- to long-term survival has been reported for MoM hip resurfacing by the designer surgeons (McMinn et al. 2011; Treacy et al. 2011) and independent centres (Coulter et al. 2012; Holland et al. 2012; Murray et al. 2012).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ALVAL:
-
aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis and associated lesions
- ARMD:
-
adverse reaction to metal debris
- MHRA:
-
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
- MoM:
-
metal-on-metal
- THR:
-
total hip replacement
References
Aloisi F, Pujol-Borrell R (2006) Lymphoid neogenesis in chronic inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol 6:205–217
Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ et al (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:28–39
Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC (2007) Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89-A:735–741
Bolland BJ, Culliford DJ, Langton DJ et al (2011) High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:608–615
Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ et al (2010) Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2313–2320
Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Nelson S et al (2010) Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2321–2327
Carrothers AD, Gilbert RE, Jaiswal A et al (2010) Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:1344–1350
Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE et al (2012) Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B:315–321
Fisher J, Jin Z, Tipper J et al (2006) Tribology of alternative bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:25–34
Fujishiro T, Moojen DJ, Kobayashi N et al (2011) Perivascular and diffuse lymphocytic inflammation are not specific for failed metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1127–1133
Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM et al (2009) Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B:1566–1574
Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM et al (2009) Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B:1019–1024
Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ et al (2011) Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:572–579
Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J et al (2009) The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B:738–744
Hart AJ, Masters JP, Sandison A et al (2010) Histological and immunohistochemical response in tissue around metal on metal hips – the UK experience. Podium presentation number 010 at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, New Orleans, USA
Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ (2008) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B:1137–1142
Holland JP, Langton DJ, Hashmi M (2012) Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B:471–476
Kwon YM, Glyn-Jones S, Simpson DJ et al (2010a) Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:356–361
Kwon YM, Thomas P, Summer B et al (2010b) Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 28:444–450
Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ et al (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and larger diameter total hip replacement. A consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 92-B:38–46
Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ et al (2011a) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:1011–1016
Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS et al (2011b) Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:164–171
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519
Mahendra G, Pandit H, Kliskey K et al (2009) Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 80:653–659
Matharu GS, McBryde CW, Revell MP et al (2013) Femoral neck fracture after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence, time to fracture, and outcome after revision. J Arthroplasty 28:147–153
Matharu GS, Revell MP, Pynsent PB et al (2012) A review of hip resurfacings revised for unexplained pain. Hip Int 22:633–640
Matthies AK, Skinner JA, Osmani H et al (2012) Pseudotumors are common in well-positioned low-wearing metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1895–1906
McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H et al (2011) Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 35:231–237
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2010) Medical Device Alert: ASRTM hip replacement implant manufactured by DePuy International Ltd. MDA/2010/069. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/. Accessed 29 Sept 2012
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2012). Medical Device Alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. MDA/2012/036. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/. Accessed 29 Sept 2012
Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G, Gundle R et al (2011) Hip resurfacing and pseudotumour. Hip Int 21:279–283
Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H et al (2012) The ten-year survival of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1180–1186
Natu S, Sidaginamale RP, Gandhi J et al (2012) Adverse reactions to metal debris: histopathological features of periprosthetic soft tissue reactions seen in association with failed metal on metal hip arthroplasties. J Clin Pathol 65:409–418
Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P et al (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:847–851
Rajpura A, Porter ML, Gambhir AK et al (2011) Clinical experience of revision of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL). Hip Int 21:43–51
Revell PA (2008) The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses. J R Soc Interface 5:1263–1278
Takemura S, Braun A, Crowson C et al (2001) Lymphoid neogenesis in rheumatoid synovitis. J Immunol 167:1072–1080
The National Joint Registry Centre (2011) National Joint Registry for England and Wales 8th annual report. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/. Accessed 9 Sept 2012
Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Shears E et al (2011) Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum Âfollow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:27–33
Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ (2003) Ectopic germinal center formation in rheumatoid synovitis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 987:140–149
Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87-A:28–36
Acknowledgement
The authors received funding from Smith & Nephew PLC which was used to undertake the work presented in this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 EFORT
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matharu, G.S., Revell, M.P., Sumathi, V., Pynsent, P.B., Revell, P.A. (2013). A Clinicopathological Study of Metal-on-Metal Hips Revised for Suspected Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris. In: Knahr, K. (eds) Total Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35653-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35653-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35652-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35653-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)