Skip to main content

A Clinicopathological Study of Metal-on-Metal Hips Revised for Suspected Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract

Total hip replacement (THR) is well established as the most successful surgical procedure for the long-term alleviation of pain and disability in patients with arthritis of the hip joint (Learmonth et al. 2007). A total of 68,907 primary hip replacements were performed in England and Wales during 2010 (National Joint Registry 2011). In recent times metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings for THR have gradually been reintroduced, mainly because of the substantially lower wear rates compared to that of metal-on-polyethylene articulations and the decreased wear rates with increasing head diameters (Fisher et al. 2006). This has subsequently led to a resurgence of MoM hip resurfacing in young and active patients with hip arthritis (Amstutz et al. 2004; Treacy et al. 2011). Hip resurfacing has the added advantages of femoral bone preservation and the potential ease of future revision (Ball et al. 2007; Matharu et al. 2012a). In carefully selected patients excellent medium- to long-term survival has been reported for MoM hip resurfacing by the designer surgeons (McMinn et al. 2011; Treacy et al. 2011) and independent centres (Coulter et al. 2012; Holland et al. 2012; Murray et al. 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ALVAL:

aseptic lymphocytic vasculitis and associated lesions

ARMD:

adverse reaction to metal debris

MHRA:

Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

MoM:

metal-on-metal

THR:

total hip replacement

References

  • Aloisi F, Pujol-Borrell R (2006) Lymphoid neogenesis in chronic inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Immunol 6:205–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amstutz HC, Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ et al (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:28–39

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC (2007) Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89-A:735–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolland BJ, Culliford DJ, Langton DJ et al (2011) High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:608–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ et al (2010) Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2313–2320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell P, Ebramzadeh E, Nelson S et al (2010) Histological features of pseudotumor-like tissues from metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2321–2327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carrothers AD, Gilbert RE, Jaiswal A et al (2010) Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:1344–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter G, Young DA, Dalziel RE et al (2012) Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher J, Jin Z, Tipper J et al (2006) Tribology of alternative bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fujishiro T, Moojen DJ, Kobayashi N et al (2011) Perivascular and diffuse lymphocytic inflammation are not specific for failed metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1127–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM et al (2009) Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B:1566–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM et al (2009) Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B:1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad FS, Thakrar RR, Hart AJ et al (2011) Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:572–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart AJ, Sabah S, Henckel J et al (2009) The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B:738–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart AJ, Masters JP, Sandison A et al (2010) Histological and immunohistochemical response in tissue around metal on metal hips – the UK experience. Podium presentation number 010 at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, New Orleans, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilpern GN, Shah NN, Fordyce MJ (2008) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B:1137–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JP, Langton DJ, Hashmi M (2012) Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94-B:471–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon YM, Glyn-Jones S, Simpson DJ et al (2010a) Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92-B:356–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon YM, Thomas P, Summer B et al (2010b) Lymphocyte proliferation responses in patients with pseudotumors following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 28:444–450

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ et al (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and larger diameter total hip replacement. A consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 92-B:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ et al (2011a) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:1011–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS et al (2011b) Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahendra G, Pandit H, Kliskey K et al (2009) Necrotic and inflammatory changes in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop 80:653–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matharu GS, McBryde CW, Revell MP et al (2013) Femoral neck fracture after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence, time to fracture, and outcome after revision. J Arthroplasty 28:147–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Matharu GS, Revell MP, Pynsent PB et al (2012) A review of hip resurfacings revised for unexplained pain. Hip Int 22:633–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthies AK, Skinner JA, Osmani H et al (2012) Pseudotumors are common in well-positioned low-wearing metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1895–1906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Ziaee H et al (2011) Indications and results of hip resurfacing. Int Orthop 35:231–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2010) Medical Device Alert: ASRTM hip replacement implant manufactured by DePuy International Ltd. MDA/2010/069. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/. Accessed 29 Sept 2012

  • Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2012). Medical Device Alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. MDA/2012/036. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/. Accessed 29 Sept 2012

  • Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G, Gundle R et al (2011) Hip resurfacing and pseudotumour. Hip Int 21:279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H et al (2012) The ten-year survival of the Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:1180–1186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Natu S, Sidaginamale RP, Gandhi J et al (2012) Adverse reactions to metal debris: histopathological features of periprosthetic soft tissue reactions seen in association with failed metal on metal hip arthroplasties. J Clin Pathol 65:409–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P et al (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:847–851

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajpura A, Porter ML, Gambhir AK et al (2011) Clinical experience of revision of metal on metal hip arthroplasty for aseptic lymphocyte dominated vasculitis associated lesions (ALVAL). Hip Int 21:43–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Revell PA (2008) The combined role of wear particles, macrophages and lymphocytes in the loosening of total joint prostheses. J R Soc Interface 5:1263–1278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takemura S, Braun A, Crowson C et al (2001) Lymphoid neogenesis in rheumatoid synovitis. J Immunol 167:1072–1080

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The National Joint Registry Centre (2011) National Joint Registry for England and Wales 8th annual report. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/. Accessed 9 Sept 2012

  • Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Shears E et al (2011) Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ­follow-up of ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ (2003) Ectopic germinal center formation in rheumatoid synovitis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 987:140–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 87-A:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors received funding from Smith & Nephew PLC which was used to undertake the work presented in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew P. Revell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 EFORT

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matharu, G.S., Revell, M.P., Sumathi, V., Pynsent, P.B., Revell, P.A. (2013). A Clinicopathological Study of Metal-on-Metal Hips Revised for Suspected Adverse Reactions to Metal Debris. In: Knahr, K. (eds) Total Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35653-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35653-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35652-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35653-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics