Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 305))

Abstract

Environmental challenges decisions are often characterized by complexity, irreversibility, and uncertainty. Much of the complexity arises from the multiple-use nature of goods and services, difficulty in monetary valuation of ecological services and the involvement of numerous stakeholders. From this point of view, the objective of this paper is to propose a multicriteria methodological approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process methodology (AHP) in order to examine the scope and feasibility of AHP integrated with public participation approach. The main goal is to incorporate the prioritization criteria for the assessment of various energy policies for power alternatives, and evaluate these policies against these criteria. The three types of energy selected are: electricity production from wind farms, thermal power plants, and nuclear power plants. The results show that our model can help in the decision-making process and increase the transparency and the credibility of the process including tangibles and intangibles attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ananda, J., Herath, G.: The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning. Forest Policy and Economics 5, 13–26 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, D.R., Sweeney, D.J., Williams, T.A.: An Introduction to Management Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision- making. West Publishing, Minneapolis, St. Paul (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, F., De Montis, A., De Toro, P., Stagl, S.: MCDA methods comparison: environmental policy evaluation applied to a case study in Italy. In: Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, Austria, May 3-6 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • CCSG. From consultation to civic engagement: The road to better policymaking and governance in Hong Kong. Centre for Civil Society and Governance, HKU (2007), http://www.bauhinia.org/publications/BFRC-CES-Report.pdf (accessed March 11, 2010)

  • Chambers, R.: Whose Reality Counts? Putting the Last First. Intermediate Technology, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, J.L.: The public participation handbook: Making better decisions through citizen involvement. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G.: Consultation, Public Participation and the Integration of Multiple Interests into Policy Making. OECD, Paris (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Felice, F., Petrillo, A.: A new multicriteria methodology based on Analytic Hierarchy Process. The “Expert” AHP International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management 5(6), 439–445 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Felice, F., Petrillo, A., Falcone, D.: Multi-criteria analysis for improving public participation in strategic environmental and social planning. Multicriteria and multiagent decision making. Social and Economical Applications, Naples, November 26-27 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffey, R.B.: Sustainable futures using nuclear energy. Progress in Nuclear Energy 47(1-4), 535–543 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enserink, B., Koppenjan, J.: Public participation in China: sustainable urbanization and governance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal 18(4), 459–474 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entzinger, J.O., Ruan, D.: Optimizing nuclear reactor operation using soft computing techniques. In: Kahraman, C. (ed.) Fuzzy Applications in Industrial Enginnering. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiore, K.: Nuclear energy and sustainability: understanding ITER. Energy Policy 34(17), 3334–3341 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, G.: Environmental equity and public participation. Policy Sciences 32, 163–174 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Talhofer, V., Hofmann, A., Kubíček, P.: Mathematical model used in decision-making process with respect to the reliability of geodatabase. In: Proto, A.N., Squillante, M., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Adv. Dynamic Modeling of Economic & Social Systems. SCI, vol. 448, pp. 143–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, J.: An approach to public participation in strategic forest management planning. Forest Ecology Management 70, 75–88 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangas, J.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): standard version, forestry application and advances. In: Helles, F., Holten- Anderson, P., Wichmann, L. (eds.) Multiple Use of Forests and Other Natural Resources, pp. 96–105. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R.L.: Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde, G.: Stakeholder participation and incremental housing in subsidized housing projects in Colombia and South Africa. Habitat International 35(2), 175–187 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Manowong, E., Ogunlana, S.O.: Critical factors for successful public hearing in infrastructure development projects: a case study of the On Nuch waste disposal plant project. International Journal of Construction Management 8(1), 37–51 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau-Crimminsa, T., de Steiguera, J.E., Dennis, D.: AHP as a means for improving public participation: a pre–post experiment with university students. Forest Policy and Economics 7, 501–514 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A., Warren, A.: Legal advocacy in environmental public participation in China: raising the stakes and strengthening stakeholders. China Environment Series 8, 3–23 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G.: Conceptualising and responding to complexity. In: Spash, C., Carter, C. (eds.) Environmental Valuation in Europe, Cambridge Research for the Environment, Cambridge (2000) Policy research brief, No. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro-Clark, M. (ed.): Citizen Participation in Government. Hale & Ironmonger, Sydney (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic, N., Swart, R. (eds.): IPCC, WG III. Cambridge University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, N., Wright, S.: Power and Participatory Development. Theory and Practice. Intermediate Technology, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Omann, I.: How can multi-criteria decision analysis contribute to environmental policy making? a case study on macro-sustainability in Germany. In: Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, Austria, May 3-6 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C.: Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J., Taylor, J.G.: Community participation in China: Issues and processes for capacity building. Earthscan, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, A.: People’s Self Development. Perspectives on Participatory Action Research. Zed Publications, London (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L.: Fundamentals of the analytic network process. In: Proc of International Symposium on Analytical Hierarchy Process, Kobe, Japan (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L.: Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process, vol. 6. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Varol, C., Ercoskun, O.Y., Gurer, N.: Local participatory mechanisms and collective actions for sustainable urban development in Turkey. Habitat International 35(1), 9–16 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T.L.: Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks, p. 15213. RWS Publications, 4922 Ellsworth Ave., Pittsburgh (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vettivel, S.K.: Community Participation. Empowering the Poorest. Roles of NGOs. Vetri, New Delhi (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wignaraja, P., Hussain, A., Sethi, H., Wignaraja, G.: Lessons from South Asia. Lessons from. Oxford University Press, Karachi (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woltjer, J.: Concepts of participatory decision-making in Dutch infrastructure planning. In: Woltjer, J. (ed.) Public Participation and Better Environmental Decisions, pp. 153–163. Springer, London (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, M., Erkan, K.: Determination of acceptable operating cost level of nuclear energy for Turkey’s power system. Energy 32, 128–136 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio De Felice .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Felice, F., Petrillo, A. (2013). Decision-Making Analysis to Improve Public Participation in Strategic Energy Production Management. In: Ventre, A., Maturo, A., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Multicriteria and Multiagent Decision Making with Applications to Economics and Social Sciences. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 305. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35635-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35635-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35634-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35635-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics