Skip to main content

Using Auxiliary Information and Nonparametric Methods in Weighting Adjustments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics

Part of the book series: Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics ((STASSPSS))

Abstract

Weighting adjustments are commonly used in survey estimation to compensate for unequal selection probabilities, nonresponse, noncoverage, and sampling fluctuations from known population values. Over time many weighting methods have been proposed, mainly in the nonresponse framework. These methods generally make use of auxiliary variables to reduce the bias of the estimators and improve their efficiency. Frequently, a substantial amount of auxiliary information is available and the choice of the auxiliary variables and the way in which they are employed may be significant. Moreover, the efficacy of weighting adjustments is often seen as a bias–variance trade-off. In this chapter, we analyze these aspects of the nonresponse weighting adjustments and investigate the properties of mean estimators adjusted by individual response probabilities estimated through nonparametric methods in situations where multiple covariates are both categorical and continuous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aitchison, J., Aitken, C.G.G.: Multivariate binary discrimination by the kernel method. Biometrica 68, 301–309 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beaumont, J.F.: Calibrated imputations in survey under a model-assisted approach. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 67, 445–458 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Da Silva, D.N., Opsomer, J.D.: A kernel smoothing method of adjusting for unit nonresponse in sample survey. Can. J. Stat. 34, 563–579 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Da Silva, D.N., Opsomer, J.D.: Nonparametric propensity weighting for survey nonresponse through local polynomial regression. Surv. Meth. 35, 165–176 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giommi, A.: A simple method for estimating individual response probabilities in sampling from finite populations. Metron 42, 185–200 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giommi, A.: Nonparametric methods for estimating individual response probabilities. Surv. Meth. 13, 127–134 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holt, D., Smith, T.M.F.: Post stratification. J. R. L. Stat. Soc. B 142, 33–46 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kalton, G., Kasprzyk, D.: The treatment of missing survey data. Surv. Meth. 12, 1–16 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim, J.K., Kim, J.J.: Nonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated response probabilities. Can. J. Stat. 35, 501–514 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kish, L.: Weighting for unequal Pi. J. Offic. Stat. 8, 183–200 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Q., Racine, J.S.: Cross validated local linear nonparametric regression. Statistica Sinica 14, 485–512 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Q., Racine, J.S.: Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Little, R.J.A.: Survey nonresponse adjustment. Int. Stat. Rev. 54, 139–157 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Little, R.J.A., Rubin, D.B.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. Wiley, New York (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Little, R.J.A., Vartivarian, S.: Does weighting for nonresponse increase the variance of survey mean. Surv. Meth. 31, 161–168 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oh, H.L., Scheuren, F.S.: Weighting adjustments for unit nonresponse. In: Madow, W.G., Olkin, I., Rubin, D.B. (eds.) Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, 2, Theory and Bibliographies, pp. 143–184. Academic Press, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Niyonsenga, T.: Nonparametric estimation of response probabilities in sampling theory. Surv. Meth. 20, 177–184 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niyonsenga, T.: Response probability estimation. J. Stat. Plann. Infer. 59, 111–126 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosenbaum, P.R.: Model-based direct adjustment. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82, 387–394 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, M.C., van Ryzin, J.: A class of smooth estimators for discrete distributions. Biometrica 68, 301–309 (1981)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emilia Rocco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rocco, E. (2013). Using Auxiliary Information and Nonparametric Methods in Weighting Adjustments. In: Torelli, N., Pesarin, F., Bar-Hen, A. (eds) Advances in Theoretical and Applied Statistics. Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35588-2_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics