Skip to main content

Abstract

Construction waste originates from various sources from the inception through completion of a building project. Previous research has shown that there is a link between the quantity of waste generated and the way labour is organized in the construction industry. However, these studies have failed to look into the sources of waste and how it affects the waste generation. To fill this gap in the literature, this study investigated the impact of labour arrangements on construction waste generation, particularly the sources of waste origin and the attitudes of workers. Using a combination of direct observations and source evaluations on the sites of six case studies, the construction waste in direct and subcontracted labour arrangements was quantified. A questionnaire survey was administered among the workers participating in the observation study to elicit their attitudes towards waste. The results show that the subcontracted labour arrangement produced higher waste than the direct labour in all three work processes considered. A lack of organizational commitment and strategy was found to be the main barrier to waste reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tam VWY, Shen LY, Tam CM (2007) Assessing the compositions of material wastage affected by sub-contracting relationships and projects types with their correlations. Build Environ 42(5):1471–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Teo MMM, Loosemore M (2001) A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry. Constr Manag Econ 19(7):741–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kulatunga U, Amaratunga D, Haigh R, Rameezdeen R (2006) Attitudes and perceptions of construction work force on construction waste in Sri Lanka. Manag Environ Qual 17(1):57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bossink BAG, Brouwers HJH (1996) Construction waste: quantification and source evaluation. Constr Eng Manag 122(1):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Esin T, Cosgun C (2007) A study conducted to reduce construction waste generation in Turkey. Build Environ 42:1667–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Faniran OO, Caban G (1998) Minimizing waste on construction project sites. Eng Constr Archit Manag 5(2):182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ekanayake LL, Ofori G (2004) Building waste assessment score: design-based tool. Build Environ 39:851–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Poon CS, Yu ATW, Wong SW, Cheung E (2004) Management of construction waste in public housing projects in Hong Kong. Constr Manag Econ 22(8):675–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu W, Yuan H, Li J, Hao JJL, Mi X, Ding Z (2011) An empirical investigation of construction and demolition waste generation rates in Shenzhen city, South China. Waste Manag 31:680–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gavilan RM, Bernold LE (1994) Source evaluation of solid waste in building construction. Constr Eng Manag 120(3):536–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kharrufa S (2007) Reduction of building waste in Baghdad Iraq. Build Environ 42:2053–2061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agamuthu P (2009) Challenges in sustainable management of construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag Res 26:491–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ortiz O, Pasqualino JC, Castells F (2010) Environmental performance of construction waste: comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain. Waste Manag 30:646–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Sari M, Al-Khatib IA, Avaraamides M, Fatta-Kassinos D (2012) A study on the attitudes and behavioural influences of construction waste management in occupied Palestinian Territory. Waste Manag Res 30(2):122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Begum RA, Siwar C, Pereira JJ, Jaafar AH (2009) Attitude and behavioral factors in waste management in the construction industry of Malaysia. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:321–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saunders J, Wynn P (2004) Attitude towards waste minimization amongst labour only sub-contractors. Struct Surv 22(3):148–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johnston H, Minks WR (1995) Cost effective waste minimization for construction managers. Cost Eng 37(1):31–39

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ekanayake LL, Ofori G (2000) Construction material waste source evaluation. Proceedings of Strategies for a Sustainable Built Environment, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeyaraja Jayamathan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jayamathan, J., Rameezdeen, R. (2014). Impact of Labour Arrangements on Construction Material Waste Generation. In: Wang, J., Ding, Z., Zou, L., Zuo, J. (eds) Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35548-6_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics