Skip to main content

A Representation Theorem for Decisions about Causal Models

  • Conference paper
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7716))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1281 Accesses

Abstract

Given the likely large impact of artificial general intelligence, a formal theory of intelligence is desirable. To further this research program, we present a representation theorem governing the integration of causal models with decision theory. This theorem puts formal bounds on the applicability of the submodel hypothesis, a normative theory of decision counterfactuals that has previously been argued on a priori and practical grounds, as well as by comparison to theories of counterfactual cognition in humans. We are able to prove four conditions under which the submodel hypothesis holds, forcing any preference between acts to be consistent with some utility function over causal submodels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arel, I.: Reward Driven Learning and the Risk of an Adversarial Artificial General Intelligence. Talk at “The Future of AGI Workshop Part 1 - Ethics of Advanced AGI,” The Fourth Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bostrom, N.: The Superintelligent Will: Motivation and Instrumental Rationality in Advanced Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 22, 71–85 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chalmers, D.: The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17, 7–65 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chalmers, D.: The Singularity: a Reply. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drescher, G.: Good and real: Demystifying paradoxes from physics to ethics. Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Galles, D., Pearl, J.: An Axiomatic Characterization of Counterfactuals. Foundations of Science III, 151–182 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Goertzel, B.: Should Humanity Build a Global AI Nanny to Delay the Singularity Until It’s Better Understood? Journal of Consciousness Studies 19, 96–111 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goertzel, B.: Nine Ways to Bias Open-Source AGI Toward Friendliness. Journal of Evolution and Technology 22, 116–131 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Good, I.J.: Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine. In: Alt, F.L., Rubinoff, M. (eds.) Advances in Computers, vol. 6, pp. 31–88 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hutter, M.: Can Intelligence Explode? Journal of Consciousness Studies 19, 143–166 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hutter, M.: Universal algorithmic intelligence: A mathematical top-down approach. In: Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 227–290. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Legg, S.: Is there an Elegant Universal Theory of Prediction? IDSIA Technical Report No. IDSIA-12-06 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Legg, S.: Machine Super Intelligence. PhD dissertation, University of Lugano (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muehlhauser, L., Salamon, A.: Intelligence Explosion: Evidence and Import. In: The Singularity Hypothesis: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pearl, J.: Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: AI: A Modern Approach, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidhuber, J.: Philosophers & Futurists, Catch Up! Journal of Consciousness Studies 19, 173–182 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidhuber, J.: Gödel machines: Fully Self-Referential Optimal Universal Self-Improvers. In: Artificial General Intelligence, pp. 119–226 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Solomonoff, R.: A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference, Part I. Information and Control 7(1), 1–22 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Solomonoff, R.: A Formal Theory of Inductive Inference, Part II. Information and Control 7(2), 224–254 (1964)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Voorneveld, M.: Mathematical Foundations of Microeconomic Theory: Preference, Utility, Choice (2010), https://studentweb.hhs.se/CourseWeb/CourseWeb/Public/PhD501/1001/micro1.pdf

  22. Yudkowsky, E.: Artificial intelligence as a positive and negative factor in global risk. In: Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yudkowsky, E.: Complex Value Systems are Required to Realize Valuable Futures. In: The Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yudkowsky, E., et al.: Reducing Long-Term Catastrophic Risks from Artificial Intelligence. The Singularity Institute, San Francisco (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yudkowsky, E.: Timeless decision theory. The Singularity Institute, San Francisco (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yudkowsky, E.: Ingredients of Timeless Decision Theory (2009), http://lesswrong.com/lw/15z/ingredients_of_timeless_decision_theory/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dewey, D. (2012). A Representation Theorem for Decisions about Causal Models. In: Bach, J., Goertzel, B., Iklé, M. (eds) Artificial General Intelligence. AGI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7716. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35505-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35506-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics