Skip to main content

Noisy Reasoners: Errors of Judgement in Humans and AIs

  • Conference paper
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7716))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1267 Accesses

Abstract

This paper examines reasoning under uncertainty in the case where the AI reasoning mechanism is itself subject to random error or noise in its own processes. The main result is a demonstration that systematic, directed biases naturally arise if there is random noise in a reasoning process that follows the normative rules of probability theory. A number of reliable errors in human reasoning under uncertainty can be explained as the consequence of these systematic biases due to noise. Since AI systems are subject to noise, we should expect to see the same biases and errors in AI reasoning systems based on probability theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Costello, F.: How probability theory explains the conjunction fallacy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 22(3), 213–234 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Costello, F.J.: Fallacies in probability judgments for conjunctions and disjunctions of everyday events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 22(3), 235–251 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Erev, I., Wallsten, T.S., Budescu, D.V.: Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psychological Review 101(3), 519–527 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huffman, C.W., Pless, V.: Fundamentals of Error-Correcting Codes. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mukherjee, S.: Architecture Design for Soft Errors. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tversky, A., Koehler, D.J.: Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review 101(4), 547–566 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Costello, F. (2012). Noisy Reasoners: Errors of Judgement in Humans and AIs. In: Bach, J., Goertzel, B., Iklé, M. (eds) Artificial General Intelligence. AGI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7716. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35506-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35505-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35506-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics