Skip to main content

The Deep Conchal Bowl: Accentuation of the Helical Crus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty

Abstract

The helical crus normally separates the concha cavum and the concha cymba. Absence of the helical crus may contribute to the appearance of the deep conchal bowl. A technique to create the helical crus and thereby improve the appearance of the conchal bowl is presented. Shaving of eminentia on the posterior aspect of the conchal cartilage may also be a helpful adjunct in cosmetic otoplasty. Accentuation of the helical crus and shaving of the eminentia can be used to create a more normal appearing ear while minimizing the complications associated with other techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA. Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(4):60e–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Furnas DW. Correction of prominent ears by concha-mastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(3):189–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morestin H. De la reposition et du plissement cosmétiques du pavillon de l’oreille. Rev Orthop. 1903;|4:394.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beasley NJ, Jones NS. Otoplasty: the problem of the deep conchal bowl. J Laryngol Otol. 1996;110(9):864–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhatti A, Donovan D. Sutureless otoplasty by scoring of the cartilage: a study in 34 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45(3):217–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bulstrode N. Otoplasty by percutaneous anterior scoring. Another twist to the story: a long-term study of 114 patients. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(2):145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spira M, Stal S. The conchal flap: an adjunct in otoplasty. Ann Plast Surg. 1983;11(4):291–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Luckett WH. A new operation for prominent ears base on the anatomy of the deformity. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1910;10:365–7.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mustarde JC. The correction of different types of prominent ears. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1983;7(3):163–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sie KC, Ou H. Otoplasty: an alternative approach to management of the deep conchal bowl. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(11):2092–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen C. Y. Sie M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patel, S., Sie, K.C.Y. (2013). The Deep Conchal Bowl: Accentuation of the Helical Crus. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35430-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35431-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics