Skip to main content

Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping Otoplasty for Prominent Ears

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty

Abstract

Outstanding ear is the most common congenital deformity of the external ear. The existence of over 200 different otoplasty techniques not only gives the surgeon plenty of selection but also indicates that no single technique has been found suitable to correct all the different components that can contribute to auricular protuberance. Many of these techniques have proven successful in their ability to achieve high patient satisfaction despite the significant variations in these techniques. Despite high patient contentment, each technique has intrinsic strong points, limitations, and complications. So the revolution in the fine art of sculpturing otoplasty is in the talent to realize such three aspects together with consideration of the elastic properties of ear cartilage and its thickness. Applying novel tools such as laser interacting with the cartilage components whatever its thickness and leading to cartilage reshaping is a promising sculpture implement. In the track of decision making is the infinitely complex structure of the auricle, great variation between individuals, and dissimilarities between the two sides of the same individual. The present approach to treat outstanding ears includes a careful evaluation of the deformity in the context of normative standards. The goal is symmetry with innovative use of constructing the auricle in three dimensions and correction of each part of the deformity using carbon dioxide laser followed by internal suture molding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bichara DA, O’Sullivan NA, Pomerantseva I, Zhao X, Sundback CA, Vacanti JP, et al. The tissue-engineered auricle: past, present, and future. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18(1):51–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Widgerow AD. Revision otoplasty: the contracted antihelical fold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):827–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stenstrom SJ. A “natural” technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;32:509–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mustardé JC. The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;39(4):382–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Furnas DW. Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(3):189–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Walter C. Plastic surgery of protruding ears. HNO. 1998;46(3):193–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Converse JM, Wood-Smith D. Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;31:118–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Owsley TG, Biggerstaff TG. Otoplasty complications. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009;21(1):105–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan KH. Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods. Br J Plast Surg. 1986;39(2):270–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nachlas NE. Otoplasty. In: Papel ID, Larrabee W, Holt GR, et al., editors. Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2002. 309–31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vuyk HD. Cartilage-sparing otoplasty: a review with long-term results. J Laryngol Otol. 1997;111(5):424–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Olivier B, Mohammad H, Christian A, Akram R. Retrospective study of the long-term results of otoplasty using a modified Mustardé (cartilage-sparing) technique. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38(3):340–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. da Silva Freitas R, Shin JH, Persing JA, Alonso N, Busato L. Solving the sharpness borders in otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(6):197e–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobol E, Omel’chenko A, Mertig M, Pompe W. Scanning force microscopy of the fine structure of cartilage irradiated with a CO2 laser. Lasers Med Sci. 2000;15:15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holden PK, Chlebicki C, Wong BJ. Minimally invasive ear reshaping with a 1450-nm diode laser using cryogen spray cooling in New Zealand white rabbits. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(6):399–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Janík I, Stárek I, Hlozek Z, Hubácek J, Novotný R, Dvorácková J. Histomorphological transformation of the auricular cartilage after carbon dioxide laser-assisted Mustardé otoplasty. An experimental study. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24(3):433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ayhan M, Deren O, Görgü M, Erdogan B, Dursun A. Cartilage shaping with the Er:YAG laser: an in vivo experimental study. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(5):527–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jones N, Sviridov A, Sobol E, Omelchenko A, Lowe J. A prospective randomised study of laser reshaping of cartilage in vivo. Lasers Med Sci. 2001;16(4):284–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baumann M, Jörgensen B, Rohde E, Bindig U, Müller G, Scheller EE. Influence of wavelength, power ­density and exposure time of laser radiation on ­chondrocyte cultures – an in-vitro investigation. Med Laser Appl. 2006;21:191–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kelley P, Hollier L, Stal S. Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(5):643–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weinzweig N, Chen L, Walter GS. Histomorphology of neochodrogenesis after antithelical fold creation: a comparison of three otoplasty techniques in the rabbit. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;33(4):371–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. MacGregor FC. Ear deformities: social and psychological implications. Clin Plast Surg. 1978;5(3):347–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Balogh B, Millesi H. Are growth alterations a consequence of surgery for prominent ears? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(2):192–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McDowell A. Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;41(1):17–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wright WK. Otoplasty goals and principles. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92(6):568–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ragab A. Carbon dioxide laser-assisted cartilage reshaping otoplasty: a new technique for prominent ears. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(7):1312–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Ragab M.D., Ph.D. (Brussels) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ragab, A. (2013). Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping Otoplasty for Prominent Ears. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35430-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35431-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics