Abstract
Outstanding ear is the most common congenital deformity of the external ear. The existence of over 200 different otoplasty techniques not only gives the surgeon plenty of selection but also indicates that no single technique has been found suitable to correct all the different components that can contribute to auricular protuberance. Many of these techniques have proven successful in their ability to achieve high patient satisfaction despite the significant variations in these techniques. Despite high patient contentment, each technique has intrinsic strong points, limitations, and complications. So the revolution in the fine art of sculpturing otoplasty is in the talent to realize such three aspects together with consideration of the elastic properties of ear cartilage and its thickness. Applying novel tools such as laser interacting with the cartilage components whatever its thickness and leading to cartilage reshaping is a promising sculpture implement. In the track of decision making is the infinitely complex structure of the auricle, great variation between individuals, and dissimilarities between the two sides of the same individual. The present approach to treat outstanding ears includes a careful evaluation of the deformity in the context of normative standards. The goal is symmetry with innovative use of constructing the auricle in three dimensions and correction of each part of the deformity using carbon dioxide laser followed by internal suture molding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bichara DA, O’Sullivan NA, Pomerantseva I, Zhao X, Sundback CA, Vacanti JP, et al. The tissue-engineered auricle: past, present, and future. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18(1):51–61.
Widgerow AD. Revision otoplasty: the contracted antihelical fold. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(3):827–30.
Stenstrom SJ. A “natural” technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;32:509–18.
Mustardé JC. The treatment of prominent ears by buried mattress sutures: a ten-year survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1967;39(4):382–6.
Furnas DW. Correction of prominent ears by conchamastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(3):189–93.
Walter C. Plastic surgery of protruding ears. HNO. 1998;46(3):193–4.
Converse JM, Wood-Smith D. Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;31:118–28.
Owsley TG, Biggerstaff TG. Otoplasty complications. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2009;21(1):105–18.
Tan KH. Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods. Br J Plast Surg. 1986;39(2):270–3.
Nachlas NE. Otoplasty. In: Papel ID, Larrabee W, Holt GR, et al., editors. Facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 2002. 309–31.
Vuyk HD. Cartilage-sparing otoplasty: a review with long-term results. J Laryngol Otol. 1997;111(5):424–30.
Olivier B, Mohammad H, Christian A, Akram R. Retrospective study of the long-term results of otoplasty using a modified Mustardé (cartilage-sparing) technique. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38(3):340–7.
da Silva Freitas R, Shin JH, Persing JA, Alonso N, Busato L. Solving the sharpness borders in otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123(6):197e–9.
Sobol E, Omel’chenko A, Mertig M, Pompe W. Scanning force microscopy of the fine structure of cartilage irradiated with a CO2 laser. Lasers Med Sci. 2000;15:15–23.
Holden PK, Chlebicki C, Wong BJ. Minimally invasive ear reshaping with a 1450-nm diode laser using cryogen spray cooling in New Zealand white rabbits. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;11(6):399–404.
Janík I, Stárek I, Hlozek Z, Hubácek J, Novotný R, Dvorácková J. Histomorphological transformation of the auricular cartilage after carbon dioxide laser-assisted Mustardé otoplasty. An experimental study. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24(3):433–7.
Ayhan M, Deren O, Görgü M, Erdogan B, Dursun A. Cartilage shaping with the Er:YAG laser: an in vivo experimental study. Ann Plast Surg. 2002;49(5):527–31.
Jones N, Sviridov A, Sobol E, Omelchenko A, Lowe J. A prospective randomised study of laser reshaping of cartilage in vivo. Lasers Med Sci. 2001;16(4):284–90.
Baumann M, Jörgensen B, Rohde E, Bindig U, Müller G, Scheller EE. Influence of wavelength, power density and exposure time of laser radiation on chondrocyte cultures – an in-vitro investigation. Med Laser Appl. 2006;21:191–8.
Farkas LG. Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. New York: Raven; 1994.
Kelley P, Hollier L, Stal S. Otoplasty: evaluation, technique, and review. J Craniofac Surg. 2003;14(5):643–53.
Weinzweig N, Chen L, Walter GS. Histomorphology of neochodrogenesis after antithelical fold creation: a comparison of three otoplasty techniques in the rabbit. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;33(4):371–6.
MacGregor FC. Ear deformities: social and psychological implications. Clin Plast Surg. 1978;5(3):347–50.
Balogh B, Millesi H. Are growth alterations a consequence of surgery for prominent ears? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;90(2):192–9.
McDowell A. Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;41(1):17–27.
Wright WK. Otoplasty goals and principles. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92(6):568–72.
Ragab A. Carbon dioxide laser-assisted cartilage reshaping otoplasty: a new technique for prominent ears. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(7):1312–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ragab, A. (2013). Carbon Dioxide Laser-Assisted Cartilage Reshaping Otoplasty for Prominent Ears. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35430-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35431-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)