Abstract
This chapter attempts to identify problem areas and suggest possible remedial means to rectify critical literacy deficits of students who write research papers in Cultural and Media Studies (CMS) at the Institute of English Studies of Opole University, Poland. Despite sufficient levels of English proficiency and ever easier access to CMS sources, students report daunting problems in selecting and framing their research objectives, stating their positions, and arguing for them. They also find it hard to evaluate materials in terms of relevance and credibility. In brief, they often lack what can be described as critical literacy—a set of skills to interrogate the social, institutional and ideological aspects of academic discourse. Critical literacy in academic contexts involves specific cognitive strategies of information processing, but, above all, it requires overcoming affective filters and cultural habits that constitute obstacles to criticality. This chapter follows action research methodology in exploring how critical literacy could be fostered at university level by (1) reviewing the contents of the current English for Academic Purposes (EAP) curriculum, (2) consulting student-reported problems connected with writing CMS research papers, (3) reviewing some approaches to criticism, such as those derived from Critical Discourse Analysis and Critical Language Awareness, and (4) suggesting an intervention in the form of an elective subject called Critical Literacy for Academic Purposes (CLAP).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Biber, D. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Bourdieu, P. 1991. Language and symbolic power. (trans. J.B. Thompson). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Clark, R. 1992. Principles and practice of CLA in the classroom. In Critical language awareness. ed. N. Fairclough, 117-140. Harlow: Longman.
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and power. Harlow: Longman.
Fairclough, N., ed. 1992. Critical language awareness. Harlow: Longman.
Foucault, M. 1972. The archeology of knowledge. (trans. A. Sheridan-Smith). London: Tavistock.
Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
GabryĹ›-Barker, D., ed. 2011. Action research in teacher development. An overview of research methodology. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu ĹšlÄ…skiego.
Giroux, H. 1988. Schooling and the struggle for pedagogies: Critical and feminist discourses as regimes of truth. London: Routledge.
Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Halliday, M. A.K. 1985. An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., and J.R. Martin. 1993. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
Holme, R. 2004. Literacy: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ivanic, R., and J. Simpson. 1992. Who is who in academic writing. In Critical language awareness. ed. N. Fairclough, 141-173. Harlow: Longman.
Janks, H., and R. Ivanic. 1992. Critical language awareness and emancipatory discourse. In Critical language awareness. ed. N. Fairclough, 305-331. Harlow: Longman.
Janks, H. 2010. Literacy and power. London: Routledge.
Martin, J.R., and D. Rose. 2008. Genre relations. Mapping culture. London/Oakville: Equinox Publishing.
Nunan, D. 1992. Research methodology in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallace, C. 2003. Critical reading in language education. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wodak, R., and P. Chilton. 2005. A new agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, methodology and interdiscipinarity. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Molek-Kozakowska, K. (2013). How to Foster Critical Literacy in Academic Contexts: Some Insights from Action Research on Writing Research Papers. In: Piechurska-Kuciel, E., Szymańska-Czaplak, E. (eds) Language in Cognition and Affect. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35305-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35305-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35304-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35305-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)