Skip to main content

Lung SPECT/CT

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Applications of SPECT-CT

Abstract

The accurate diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) is challenging for both clinicians and imaging specialists. Misdiagnosis must be avoided because untreated PE has a mortality rate reported to be up to 30 %, and unnecessary treatment with anticoagulation places patients at risk of bleeding [1–3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dalen JE. Pulmonary embolism: what have we learned since Virchow?: treatment and prevention. Chest. 2002;122:1801–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levine MN, Raskob G, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Schulman S. Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest. 2004;126:287S–310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nijkeuter M, Sohne M, Tick LW, Kamphuisen PW, Kramer MH, et al. The natural course of hemodynamically stable pulmonary embolism: clinical outcome and risk factors in a large prospective cohort study. Chest. 2007;131:517–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax. 2003;58:470–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson DR, Kahn SR, Rodger MA, Kovacs MJ, Morris T, et al. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography vs ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298:2743–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Strashun AM. A reduced role of V/Q scintigraphy in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1405–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner Jr HN, Sabiston Jr DC, McAfee JG, Tow D, Stern HS. Diagnosis of massive pulmonary embolism in man by radioisotope scanning. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:377–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bajc M, Neilly JB, Miniati M, Schuemichen C, Meignan M, et al. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy: part 1. Pulmonary imaging with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:1356–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McNeil BJ, Holman BL, Adelstein SJ. The scintigraphic definition of pulmonary embolism. JAMA. 1974;227:753–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Glassroth J. Imaging of pulmonary embolism: too much of a good thing? JAMA. 2007;298:2788–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dalen JE. New PIOPED recommendations for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2006;119:1001–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meignan MA. Lung ventilation/perfusion SPECT: the right technique for hard times. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:648–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schumichen C. V/Q-scanning/SPECT for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Respiration. 2003;70:329–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morrell NW, Nijran KS, Jones BE, Biggs T, Seed WA. The underestimation of segmental defect size in radionuclide lung scanning. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:370–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Magnussen JS, Chicco P, Palmer AW, Bush V, Mackey DW, et al. Single-photon emission tomography of a computerised model of pulmonary embolism. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:1430–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gray HW, McKillop JH, Bessent RG. Lung scan reporting language: what does it mean? Nucl Med Commun. 1993;14:1084–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gray HW, McKillop JH, Bessent RG. Lung scan reports: interpretation by clinicians. Nucl Med Commun. 1993;14:989–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ. Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: time for a new approach. Radiology. 1996;199:25–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott HR, Gillen GJ, Shand J, Bryden F, Milroy R. A structured approach to the interpretation and reporting of ventilation/perfusion scans. Nucl Med Commun. 1998;19:107–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kember PG, Euinton HA, Morcos SK. Clinicians’ interpretation of the indeterminate ventilation-perfusion scan report. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1109–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. PIOPED. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA. 1990;263:2753–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leblanc M, Paul N. V/Q SPECT and computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:426–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carrasquillo JA, Rogers JV, Williams DL, Shuman WP, Olson DO, et al. Single-photon emission computed tomography of the normal liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141:937–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hacot JP, Bojovic M, Delonca J, Meier B, Righetti A. Comparison of planar imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection and localization of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 1993;9:113–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Osborne DR, Jaszczak RJ, Greer K, Roggli V, Lischko M, et al. Detection of pulmonary emboli in dogs: comparison of single photon emission computed tomography, gamma camera imaging, and angiography. Radiology. 1983;146:493–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bajc M, Bitzen U, Olsson B, Perez de Sa V, Palmer J, et al. Lung ventilation/perfusion SPECT in the artificially embolized pig. J Nucl Med. 2002;43:640–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bajc M, Olsson CG, Olsson B, Palmer J, Jonson B. Diagnostic evaluation of planar and tomographic ventilation/perfusion lung images in patients with suspected pulmonary emboli. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2004;24:249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Collart JP, Roelants V, Vanpee D, Lacrosse M, Trigaux JP, et al. Is a lung perfusion scan obtained by using single photon emission computed tomography able to improve the radionuclide diagnosis of pulmonary embolism? Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:1107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Reinartz P, Wildberger JE, Schaefer W, Nowak B, Mahnken AH, et al. Tomographic imaging in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a comparison between V/Q lung scintigraphy in SPECT technique and multislice spiral CT. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:1501–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Laurence IJ, Redman SL, Corrigan AJ, Graham RN. V/Q SPECT imaging of acute pulmonary embolus – a practical perspective. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:941–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, Johnbeck CB, von der Recke P, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT: head-to-head comparison with multidetector CT angiography. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1987–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leblanc M, Leveillee F, Turcotte E. Prospective evaluation of the negative predictive value of V/Q SPECT using 99mTc-Technegas. Nucl Med Commun. 2007;28:667–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Li DK, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ. V/Q mismatches unassociated with pulmonary embolism: case report and review of the literature. J Nucl Med. 1978;19:1331–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Miniati M, Pistolesi M, Marini C, Di Ricco G, Formichi B, et al. Value of perfusion lung scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: results of the Prospective Investigative Study of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PISA-PED). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;154:1387–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Freeman LM. Don’t bury the V/Q scan: it’s as good as multidetector CT angiograms with a lot less radiation exposure. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:5–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schoepf UJ, Costello P. CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: state of the art. Radiology. 2004;230:329–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP, Shah SA, Rivera MP, et al. The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1961–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Harris B, Bailey D, Roach P, Bailey E, King G. Fusion imaging of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and SPECT ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy: initial experience and potential benefit. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:135–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roach PJ, Bailey DL. Combining anatomy and function: the future of medical imaging. Intern Med J. 2005;35:577–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vogel WV, Oyen WJ, Barentsz JO, Kaanders JH, Corstens FH. PET/CT: panacea, redundancy, or something in between? J Nucl Med. 2004;45 Suppl 1:15S–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Roach PJ, Bailey DL, Schembri GP, Thomas PA. Transition from planar to SPECT V/Q scintigraphy: rationale, practicalities, and challenges. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:397–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bailey DL, Roach PJ, Bailey EA, Hewlett J, Keijzers R. Development of a cost-effective modular SPECT/CT scanner. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1415–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schillaci O. Hybrid SPECT/CT: a new era for SPECT imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:521–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lardinois D, Weder W, Hany TF, Kamel EM, Korom S, et al. Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2500–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schoepf UJ. Pulmonary artery CTA. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;9:180–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gradinscak DJ, Roach P, Schembri GP. Can perfusion SPECT improve the accuracy of CTPA? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:S463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen C, von der Recke P, Kristoffersen US, et al. Added value of combined simultaneous lung ventilation-perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography/multi-slice-computed tomography angiography in two patients suspected of having acute pulmonary embolism. Clin Respir J. 2007;1:52–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Gutman F, Hangard G, Gardin I, Varmenot N, Pattyn J, et al. Evaluation of a rigid registration method of lung perfusion SPECT and thoracic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1516–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ketai L, Hartshorne M. Potential uses of computed tomography-SPECT and computed tomography-coincidence fusion images of the chest. Clin Nucl Med. 2001;26:433–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Roach PJ, Bailey DL, Harris BE. Enhancing lung scintigraphy with single-photon emission computed tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2008;38:441–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Petersson J, Sanchez-Crespo A, Larsson SA, Mure M. Physiological imaging of the lung: single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT). J Appl Physiol. 2007;102:468–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. van Beek EJ, Dahmen AM, Stavngaard T, Gast KK, Heussel CP, et al. Hyperpolarised 3He MRI versus HRCT in COPD and normal volunteers: PHIL trial. Eur Respir J. 2009;34:1311–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Suga K, Kawakami Y, Zaki M, Yamashita T, Shimizu K, et al. Clinical utility of co-registered respiratory-gated(99m)Tc-Technegas/MAA SPECT-CT images in the assessment of regional lung functional impairment in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2004;31:1280–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Jogi J, Jonson B, Ekberg M, Bajc M. Ventilation-perfusion SPECT with 99mTc-DTPA versus Technegas: a head-to-head study in obstructive and nonobstructive disease. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:735–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Crawford AB, Davison A, Amis TC, Engel LA. Intrapulmonary distribution of 99mtechnetium labelled ultrafine carbon aerosol (Technegas) in severe airflow obstruction. Eur Respir J. 1990;3:686–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Amis TC, Crawford AB, Davison A, Engel LA. Distribution of inhaled 99mtechnetium labelled ultrafine carbon particle aerosol (Technegas) in human lungs. Eur Respir J. 1990;3:679–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Burch WM, Boyd MM, Crellin DE. Technegas: particle size and distribution. Eur J Nucl Med. 1994;21:365–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lemb M, Oei TH, Eifert H, Gunther B. Technegas: a study of particle structure, size and distribution. Eur J Nucl Med. 1993;20:576–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Peltier P, De Faucal P, Chetanneau A, Chatal JF. Comparison of technetium-99m aerosol and krypton-81m in ventilation studies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Nucl Med Commun. 1990;11:631–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Bailey EA, Bailey DL, Roach PJ. V/Q imaging in 2010: a quick start guide. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:408–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hudson HM, Larkin RS. Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13:601–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hutton BF, Hudson HM, Beekman FJ. A clinical perspective of accelerated statistical reconstruction. Eur J Nucl Med. 1997;24:797–808.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Roach PJ, Gradinscak DJ, Schembri GP, Bailey EA, Willowson KP, et al. SPECT/CT in V/Q scanning. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:455–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Patton JA, Turkington TG. SPECT/CT physical principles and attenuation correction. J Nucl Med Technol. 2008;36:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, et al. Procedure guideline for SPECT/CT imaging 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1227–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Studholme C, Hill DL, Hawkes DJ. Automated three-dimensional registration of magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography brain images by multiresolution optimization of voxel similarity measures. Med Phys. 1997;24:25–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Palmer J, Bitzen U, Jonson B, Bajc M. Comprehensive ventilation/perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1288–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Harris B, Bailey D, Miles S, Bailey E, Rogers K, et al. Objective analysis of tomographic ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;175:1173–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Harris B, Bailey DL, Chicco P, Bailey EA, Roach PJ, et al. Objective analysis of whole lung and lobar ventilation/perfusion relationships in pulmonary embolism. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2008;28:14–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Roach PJ, Bailey DL, Schembri GP. Reinventing ventilation/perfusion lung scanning with SPECT. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:1023–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Herald P, Roach P, Schembri GP. Does the addition of low dose CT improve diagnostic accuracy of V/Q SPECT scintigraphy? J Nucl Med. 2008;49:S91.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Gradinscak DJ, Roach P, Schembri GP. Lung SPECT perfusion scintigraphy: Can CT substitute for ventilation imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:S300.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, Gottschalk A, Hales CA, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Roach PJ, Thomas P, Bajc M, Jonson B. Merits of V/Q SPECT scintigraphy compared with CTPA in imaging of pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:167–8; author reply 8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Roach PJ, Bajc M. Acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1972–3; author reply 4–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Miles S, Rogers KM, Thomas P, Soans B, Attia J, et al. A comparison of single-photon emission CT lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Chest. 2009;136:1546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Toney LK, Lewis DH, Richardson ML. Ventilation/perfusion scanning for acute pulmonary embolism: effect of direct communication on patient treatment outcomes. Clin Nucl Med. 2013;38:183–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Barrett BJ, Parfrey PS. Clinical practice. Preventing nephropathy induced by contrast medium. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:379–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Schembri GP, Miller AE, Smart R. Radiation dosimetry and safety issues in the investigation of pulmonary embolism. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:442–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Nelson RC, Toncheva G, et al. Radiation dose savings for adult pulmonary embolus 64-MDCT using bismuth breast shields, lower peak kilovoltage, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:244–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, Chung JK, Broga DW, et al. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;185:1228–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Reiman RE, Paulson EK, Frush DP, et al. Radiation dose to the female breast from 16-MDCT body protocols. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:1718–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. ICRP. Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum 2 to ICRP publication 53). Ann ICRP. 1998;28:1–126.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Jones SE, Wittram C. The indeterminate CT pulmonary angiogram: imaging characteristics and patient clinical outcome. Radiology. 2005;237:329–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Ryu JH, Swensen SJ, Olson EJ, Pellikka PA. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with use of computed tomographic angiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. U-King-Im JM, Freeman SJ, Boylan T, Cheow HK. Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2709–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Ridge CA, McDermott S, Freyne BJ, Brennan DJ, Collins CD, et al. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: comparison of pulmonary CT angiography and lung scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1223–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Yap E, Anderson G, Donald J, Wong CA, Lee YC, et al. Pleural effusion in patients with pulmonary embolism. Respirology. 2008;13:832–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Gradinscak DJ, Roach P, Schembri GP. Can CT coregistration improve the accuracy of segmental localisation on V/Q SPECT? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:S463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Zaki M, Suga K, Kawakami Y, Yamashita T, Shimizu K, et al. Preferential location of acute pulmonary thromboembolism induced consolidative opacities: assessment with respiratory gated perfusion SPECT-CT fusion images. Nucl Med Commun. 2005;26:465–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Worsley DF, Alavi A, Palevsky HI, Kundel HL. Comparison of diagnostic performance with ventilation-perfusion lung imaging in different patient populations. Radiology. 1996;199:481–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Sostman HD, Coleman RE, DeLong DM, Newman GE, Paine S. Evaluation of revised criteria for ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Radiology. 1994;193:103–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Gottschalk A, Sostman HD, Coleman RE, Juni JE, Thrall J, et al. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in the PIOPED study. Part II. Evaluation of the scintigraphic criteria and interpretations. J Nucl Med. 1993;34:1119–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Bailey DL, Schembri GP, Harris BE, Bailey EA, Cooper RA, et al. Generation of planar images from lung ventilation/perfusion SPECT. Ann Nucl Med. 2008;22:437–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Morris TA. SPECT imaging of pulmonary emboli with radiolabeled thrombus-specific imaging agents. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:474–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Bradley J. A review of radiation dose escalation trials for non-small cell lung cancer within the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Semin Oncol. 2005;32:S111–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Belderbos JS, Heemsbergen WD, De Jaeger K, Baas P, Lebesque JV. Final results of a phase I/II dose escalation trial in non-small-cell lung cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:126–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Hernando ML, Marks LB, Bentel GC, Zhou SM, Hollis D, et al. Radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity: a dose-volume histogram analysis in 201 patients with lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;51:650–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Kong FM, Hayman JA, Griffith KA, Kalemkerian GP, Arenberg D, et al. Final toxicity results of a radiation-dose escalation study in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): predictors for radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:1075–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Mazeron R, Etienne-Mastroianni B, Perol D, Arpin D, Vincent M, et al. Predictive factors of late radiation fibrosis: a prospective study in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:38–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Roeder F, Friedrich J, Timke C, Kappes J, Huber P, et al. Correlation of patient-related factors and dose-volume histogram parameters with the onset of radiation pneumonitis in patients with small cell lung cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010;186:149–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Zhang J, Ma J, Zhou S, Hubbs JL, Wong TZ, et al. Radiation-induced reductions in regional lung perfusion: 0.1-12 year data from a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:425–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Woel RT, Munley MT, Hollis D, Fan M, Bentel G, et al. The time course of radiation therapy-induced reductions in regional perfusion: a prospective study with >5 years of follow-up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;52:58–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Christian JA, Partridge M, Nioutsikou E, Cook G, McNair HA, et al. The incorporation of SPECT functional lung imaging into inverse radiotherapy planning for non-small cell lung cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:271–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Lavrenkov K, Singh S, Christian JA, Partridge M, Nioutsikou E, et al. Effective avoidance of a functional spect-perfused lung using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): an update of a planning study. Radiother Oncol. 2009;91:349–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. McGuire SM, Zhou S, Marks LB, Dewhirst M, Yin FF, et al. A methodology for using SPECT to reduce intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose to functioning lung. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66:1543–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Yin Y, Chen JH, Li BS, Liu TH, Lu J, et al. Protection of lung function by introducing single photon emission computed tomography lung perfusion image into radiotherapy plan of lung cancer. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122:509–13.

    Google Scholar 

  108. McGuire SM, Marks LB, Yin FF, Das SK. A methodology for selecting the beam arrangement to reduce the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dose to the SPECT-defined functioning lung. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:403–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Munawar I, Yaremko BP, Craig J, Oliver M, Gaede S, et al. Intensity modulated radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer incorporating SPECT ventilation imaging. Med Phys. 2010;37:1863–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Ohno Y, Koyama H, Takenaka D, Nogami M, Kotani Y, et al. Coregistered ventilation and perfusion SPECT using krypton-81m and Tc-99m-labeled macroaggregated albumin with multislice CT: utility for prediction of postoperative lung function in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:830–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. King GG, Harris B, Mahadev S. V/Q SPECT: utility for investigation of pulmonary physiology. Semin Nucl Med. 2010;40:467–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Jamadar DA, Kazerooni EA, Martinez FJ, Wahl RL. Semi-quantitative ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy and single-photon emission tomography for evaluation of lung volume reduction surgery candidates: description and prediction of clinical outcome. Eur J Nucl Med. 1999;26:734–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Inmai T, Sasaki Y, Shinkai T, Ohishi H, Nezu K, et al. Clinical evaluation of 99mTc-Technegas SPECT in thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery in patients with pulmonary emphysema. Ann Nucl Med. 2000;14:263–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Komori K, Kamagata S, Hirobe S, Toma M, Okumura K, et al. Radionuclide imaging study of long-term pulmonary function after lobectomy in children with congenital cystic lung disease. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:2096–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Xu J, Moonen M, Johansson A, Gustafsson A, Bake B. Quantitative analysis of inhomogeneity in ventilation SPET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001;28:1795–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Pellegrino R, Biggi A, Papaleo A, Camuzzini G, Rodarte JR, et al. Regional expiratory flow limitation studied with Technegas in asthma. J Appl Physiol. 2001;91:2190–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Fujita J, Takahashi K, Satoh K, Okada H, Momoi A, et al. Tc-99m Technegas scintigraphy to evaluate the lung ventilation in patients with oral corticosteroid-dependent bronchial asthma. Ann Nucl Med. 1999;13:247–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Suga K, Kuramitsu T, Yoshimizu T, Nakanishi T, Yamada N, et al. Scintigraphic analysis of hemodynamics in a patient with a single large pulmonary arteriovenous fistula. Clin Nucl Med. 1992;17:110–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Sasaki Y, Imai T, Shinkai T, Ohishi H, Otsuji H, et al. Estimation of regional lung function in interstitial pulmonary disease using 99mTc-technegas and 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin single-photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25:1623–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Nagao M, Murase K. Measurement of heterogeneous distribution on Technegas SPECT images by three-dimensional fractal analysis. Ann Nucl Med. 2002;16:369–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Willowson K, Bailey DL, Baldock C. Quantitative SPECT reconstruction using CT-derived corrections. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:3099–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Willowson K, Bailey DL, Bailey EA, Baldock C, Roach PJ. In vivo validation of quantitative SPECT in the heart. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010;30:214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul J. Roach MBBS, FRACP, FAANMS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roach, P.J. (2014). Lung SPECT/CT. In: Ahmadzadehfar, H., Biersack, HJ. (eds) Clinical Applications of SPECT-CT. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35283-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35283-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35282-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35283-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics