Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 462))

  • 1220 Accesses

Abstract

Combining ontologies can enrich knowledge within a domain and support the development and use of advanced services. This requires matching and combining the relevant ontologies for specific services, which can be supported by mapping and alignment of several ontologies. However, these techniques are not enough since the ontologies are often heterogeneous and difficult to combine. To overcome these problems, a conceptual ontology intersection is provided to map and align contents of the ontologies. This intersection is a conceptual ontology bridge between ontologies and contains parts from the involved ontologies. The contents are extracted by syntactic mapping and synonym alignment using an ontology repository, a rule base and a synonym lexicon using agents. The result is a set of concepts that together constitute the intersection, which is used for combining new incoming ontologies and, thereby, providing complex services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duc, T.T., Haase, P., Motik, B., Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I.: Metalevel Information in Ontology-Based Applications. In: Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2008), Chicago, Illinois (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. W3C: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language, Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax, W3C Recommendation (October 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gruber, T.R.: Toward Principles for the Design of Ontologies Used for Knowledge Sharing, Technical Report KSL 93-04, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Stanford University (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Knorr, M., Alferes, J.J., Hitzler, P.: Local closed world reasoning with description logics under the well-founded semantics. Artificial Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology Mapping: The State of the Art. Journal The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bouquet, P., Ehrig, M., Euzenat, J., Franconi, E., Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Serafinin, L., Stamou, G., Sure, Y., Tessaris, S.: D.2.2.1 Specification of a common framework for characterizing alignment, Knowledgeweb, realizing the semantic web (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wu, D., HÃ¥kansson, A.: Accepted in Proceedings of 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (WEBIST), April 18-21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gruber, T.: Ontology. In: Liu, L., Tamer Özsu, M. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer (2009), http://tomgruber.org/writing/ontology-definition-2007.html

  9. Sowa, J.F.: Ontology (2011), http://www.jfsowa.com/ontology/index.html

  10. Sowa, J.F.: Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds.) ICCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1867, pp. 55–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. McKeon, M.: Model-Theoretic Conceptions of Logical Consequence. Internect Encyclopedia of Philosopy. Michigan State University (2004), http://www.iep.utm.edu/logcon-m/ (Originally published: June 16, 2004)

  12. Knorr, M., Alferes, J.J., Hitzler, P.: Local closed world reasoning with description logics under the well-founded semantics. Artificial Intelligence (2011), doi:10.1016/j.artint. 2011.01.007

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gruber, T.R.: Ontolingua: A mechanism to support portable ontologies. Stanford University, Knowledge Systems Laboratory, Technical Report KSL-91-66 (March 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlsson, C., Fullér, R.: Possibility for Decision. STUDFUZZ, vol. 270. Springer, Heidelberg (2011) ISBN 978-3-642-22641-0

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Princeton University, WordNet, A lexical database for English, http://wordnet.princeton.edu/wordnet/ (last update: June 21, 2011)

  16. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description Logic Programs: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic. In: WWW 2003, May 20-24 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jérôme, E., Pavel, S.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) ISBN 3-540-49611-4

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Ontology Mapping - An Integrated Approach. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 76–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kotis, K., Vouros, G.A.: The HCONE Approach to Ontology Merging. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 137–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. de Bruijn, J., Ehrig, M., Feier, C.: Ontology mediation, merging and aligning. In: Semantic Web Technologies Trends and Research in Ontologybased Systems, pp. 1–20 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sowa, J.F.: Top-Level Ontological Categories’. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 43(5/6), 669–685 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Noy, N., Musen, M.: PROMPT: Algorithm and Tool for Automated Ontology Merging and Alignment. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sowa, J.F.: Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical and Computational Foundations. Brooks/Cole (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pinto, H.S., Gómez-Pérez, A., Martins, J.P.: Some Issues on Ontology Integration. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1999’s Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pinto, H.S., Gomez-Perez, A., Martins, J.P.: Some Issues on Ontology Integration. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1999’s Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods: Lessons Learned and Future Trends (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sowa, J.F.: Principles of ontology, http://www-ksl.stanford.edu/onto-std/mailarchive/0136.html

  27. Håkansson, A., Hartung, R., Moradian, E., Wu, D.: Comparing Ontologies Using Multi-agent System and Knowledge Base. In: Setchi, R., Jordanov, I., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2010, Part IV. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6279, pp. 124–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(1), 1–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stumme, G., Maedche, A.: Ontology Merging for Federated Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop for Foundations of Models for Information Integration (FMII 2001), Viterbo, Italy (September 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Information-Flow-Based Ontology Mapping. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2519, pp. 1132–1151. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Scharffe, F., Euzenat, J.: Linked Data Meets Ontology Matching - Enhancing Data Linking through Ontology Alignments. In: Filipe, J., Dietz, J.L.G. (eds.) KEOD 2011 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development, Paris, France, October 26-29, pp. 279–284 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dou, D., McDermott, D., Qi, P.: Ontology Translation on the Semantic Web. In: Spaccapietra, S., Bertino, E., Jajodia, S., King, R., McLeod, D., Orlowska, M.E., Strous, L. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics II. LNCS, vol. 3360, pp. 35–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite. In: de Mantaras, R.L., Saitta, L. (eds.) Proc. 16th of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), Valencia, ES, pp. 333–337 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic matching. In: Proc. IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Ontologies and Distributed Systems, Acapulco, MX, pp. 139–146 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mao, M., Peng, Y., Spring, M.: An adaptive ontology mapping approach with neural network based constraint satisfaction. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 8, 14–25 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne HÃ¥kansson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

HÃ¥kansson, A., Wu, D. (2013). Conceptual Ontology Intersection for Mapping and Alignment of Ontologies. In: Hakansson, A., Hartung, R. (eds) Agent and Multi-Agent Systems in Distributed Systems - Digital Economy and E-Commerce. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 462. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35208-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35208-9_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35207-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35208-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics