Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Konisation, Hysterektomie und Adnektomie

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Operationsatlas Gynäkologische Onkologie

  • 3910 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

Literatur zu Abschn. 9.1

  1. Apgar BS, Brotzman G (2004) Management of cervical cytologic abnormalities. Am Fam Physician 70(19):1866–1868

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, Raifu AO, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2008) Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasie: metaanalysis. BMJ 1284:337

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beckmann MW, Mallmann P et al. (2008) Interdisziplinäre S2k-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik und Therapie des Zervixkarzinomes. www: awmf.org

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertelsen B, Tande T, Sandvei R, Hartveit F (1999) Laser conization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3: free resection margins indicative of lesion-free survival. Acta Obstet Scand 76(1):54–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bisseling KC, Bekkers RL, Rome RM, Quinn MA (2007) Treatment of microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a retrospective study and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 107(3):424–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L et al (2010) Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cander: a retrospective crosssectional worldwidestudy. Lancet Oncol 11(11):1048–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kühn W (2009) Empfehlungen der AGCPC zur Kolposkopie, Diagnostik und Therapie bei Erkrankungen des unteren Genitaltraktes der Frau, AG Zervixpathologie und Kolposkopie, Sektion der DGGG; www.ag-cpc.de

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goerke K, Steller J, Valet A (2008) Klinikleitfaden Gynäkologie & Geburtshilfe, 7. Aufl. Urban, München

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gonçalves CV, Duarte G, Costa JS, Marcolin AC, Bianchi MS, Dias D, Lima LC (2009) Diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer during pregnancy. Sao Paulo Med J 127(6):359–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gondry J, Vergne C, Mui SL, Boulanger JC (1999) Conization with positive margins. Contrazept Fertil Sex 27(7/8):532–536

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jakus S, Edmonds P, Dunton C, King SA (2000) Margin status and excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a review. Obst 55(8):520–527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan KJ, Dainty LA, Dollinsky B, Rose GS, Carlson J, McHale M, Elkas JC (2004) Prognosis and recurrance risk for patients with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions diagnosed during pregnanca. Cancer 102(4):228–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E (2006) Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet 367(9509):489–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Martin-Hirsch PL, Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener H (2010) Surgery for cervical intraepitelial neoplasia. Cochraine Database Syst rev 6: (CD001318)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mota F (2003) Microinvasive squamous carcinoma oft he cervix: treatment modalities. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(6):505–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen C, Montz FJ, Bristow RE (2000) Management of stage I cervical cancer in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 55(10):633–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Panna S, Luanratanakom S (2009) Positive margin prevalence and risk factors with cervical specimens obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedures and cold knife conization. Asian Pac J Cancer Pre 10(4):637–640

    Google Scholar 

  18. Petru U, Kapp K, Reich O, Pristauz-Telsnigg G, Benedicic C, Winter R (2010) Manual der gynäkologischen Onkologie der AGO Austria. Med Media Verlagsgesellschaft, www.ago-manual.at

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reich O, Lahousen M, Pickel H et al (2002) Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: Long-term follow-up after cold knife conization with involved margins. Obstet Gynecol 99:193–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reynolds EA, Tierney K, Keeny GL, Felix JC, Weaver AL, Roman LD, Cliby WA (2010) Analysis of outcomes of microinvasive adenocarcinoma oft he uterine cervix by treatment type. Obstet Gynecol 116(5):1150–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 9.2

  1. Abdelmonem A, Wilson H, Pasic R (2006) Observational comparison of abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy as performed at a university teaching hospital. J Reprod Med 51(12):945–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Donnez O, Squifflet J, Leconte I, Jadoul P, Donnez J (2007) Posthysterectomy pelvic adenomyotic masses observed in 8 cases out of series of 1405 laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(2):156–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellström MA, Astrom M, Möller A, Olsson JH, Hahlin M (2003) A randomized trial comparing in psychological wellbeing an sexuality after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 82(9):871–875

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S et al (2004) The eVALuate study: two parallel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ 328(7432):129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Filtenborg T, Gluud C, Tabor A (2004) Randomized controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one year follow-up results. BJOG 111(7):760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gimbel H, Zobbe V, Andersen BM, Gluud C, Ottesen BS, Tabor A (2005) Total versus subtotal hysterectomy: an observational study with one year follow-up. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 45(1):64–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goetsch MF (2005) The effect of total hysterectomy on specific sexual sensations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192(6):1922–1927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Harmanli OH, Khilnani R, Dandolu V, Chatwani AJ (2004) Narrow pubic arch and increased risk of failure for vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 104(4):697–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnston N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological desease. Cochrane database Syst Rev 19 (2): CD003677 and: BMJ 2005; 330 (7506): 1478

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kluivers KB, Hendrick JC, Mol BW, Bongers M, Bremer GL, de Vet HC, Vierhout ME, Brolman HA (2007) Quality of live and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: a randomized, contriolles trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(2):145–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuppermann M, Summit Jr RL, Varner RE et al (2005) Sexual functioning after total compared with supracervical hysterectomy: a randomized study. Obstet Gynecol 105(6):1309–1318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Learman LA, Summitt Jr RL, Varner RE et al (2003) A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications an clinical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 102(3):453–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McPherson K, Metcalfe MA, Herbert A, Maresh M, Casbard A, Hargreaves J, Bridgman S, Clarke A (2004) Severe complications of hysterectomy: the VALUE study. BJOG 111(7):688–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oscarsson U, Poromaa IS, Nüssler E, Löfgren M (2006) No difference in length of hospital stay between laparoscopic and abdominal supravaginal hysterectomy – a preliminary study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 885(6):682–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Persson P, Wijma H, Hammar M, Kjølhede P (2006) Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy – a randomized controlled mulitcenter study. BJOG 113(9):1023–1030

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rooney CM, Crawford AT, Vasallo BJ, Kleeman SD, Karram MM (2005) Is previous caesarean section a risk for incidental cystotomy at the time of hysterectomy? A case controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(6):2041–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP (2003) Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing: prospective observational study of vaginal hysterectomy, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy, and total abdominal hysterectomy. BMJ 327(7418):774–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Spilsburry K, Semmens JB, Hammond I, Bolck A (2006) Persistant high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-related study of 83 000 procedures over 23 years. BJOG 113(7):804–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Thakar R, Ayers S, Clarkson P, Stanton S, Manyonda I (2002) Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 347(17):1318–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thakar R, Ayers S, Georgakapolou A, Clarkson P, Stanton S, Manyonda I (2004) Hysterectomy improves quality of life an decreases psychiatric symptoms: a prospective an randomized cmparison of total versus subtotal hysterectomy. BJOG 111(10):1115–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hofmann R, Wagner U (2009) Inkontinenz- und Deszensuschirurgie der Frau. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 9.3

  1. Agostini A, Bretelle F, Cravallo L, Maisonneuve AS, Roger V, Blanc B (2003) Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women without prolapse: a prospective comparative study. BJOC 110(5):515–518

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, Vadora E (2002) Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(6):1561–1565

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bottle A, Aylin P (2005) Variations in vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy by region and trust in England. BJOG 112(3):326–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dällenbach D, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M (2007) Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 110(3):625–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harmanli OH, Khilnani R, Dandolu V, Chatwani AJ (2004) Narrow pubic arch and increased risk of failure for vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 104(4):697–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Isik-Akby EF, Harmanli OH, Panaganamamula UR, Akbay M, Gaughan J, Chatwani AJ (2004) Hysterectomy in obese women: a Comparison of abdominal and vaginal routes. Obstet Gynecol 104(4):710–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jacobson GF, Shaber RE, Armstrong MA, Hung YY (2006) Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1278–1283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnston N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological desease. Cochrane database Syst Rev 19 (2): CD003677 und: BMJ 2005; 330 (7506): 1478

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kovac SR, Barhan S, Lister M, Tucker L, Bishop M, Das A (2002) Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: applications in a resident clinic population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187(6):1521–1527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kovac SR (2004) Transvaginal hysterectomy: rationale and surgical approach. Obstet Gynecol 103(6):1321–1325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rafii A, Samain E, Levardon M, Darai E, Deval B (2005) Vaginal hysterectomy for benign disorders in obese women: a prospective study. BJOG 112(2):223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rooney CM, Crawford AT, Vasallo BJ, Kleeman SD, Karram MM (2005) Is previous caesarean section a risk for incidental cystotomy at the time of hysterectomy? A case controlled study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 196(6):2041–2044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, van der Vaart CH, Heintz AP (2003) Hysterectomy and sexual wellbeing: prospective observational study of vaginal hysterectomy, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. BMJ 327(75/8):774–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roovers JP, van der Vaart CH, van der Bom JG, van Leeuwen JH, Scholten PC, Heintz AP (2004) A randomized controlled trial company abdominal and vaginal prolapse surgery: effects on urogenital function. BJOC 111(1):50–56

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roussis NP, Waltrous L, Kerr A, Robertazzi R, Cabbad MF (2004) Sexual response in the patient after hysterectomy: total abdominal versus supracervical versus vaginal procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(5):1427–1428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor SM, Romero AA, Kammerer-Doak DN, Qualls C, Rogers RG (2003) Abdominal hysterectomy for the enlarged myomatosus uterus compared with vaginal hysterectomy with morcellation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189(6):1579–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Tayrac R, Chevalier N, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Gervaise A, Fernandez H (2004) Risk of urge and stress urinary incontinence al long-term-follow-up after vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gyncol 191(1):90–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tunuguntla HS, Gousse AE (2006) Female sexual dysfunction following vaginal surgery: a review. J Urol 175(2):439–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Valet A (2003) Sexuelle Störungen. In: Goerke K, Steller J, Valet A (Hrsg) Klinikleitfaden Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, 6. Aufl. Urban, München

    Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 9.4

  1. Rocca WA, Bower JH, Maraganore DM, Ahlskog JE, Grossard BR, de Andrade M, Melton 3rd LJ (2007) Increased risk for cognitive impairment or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause. Neurology 69(11):1074–1083

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rocca WA, Bower JH, Maraganore DM, Ahlskog JE, Grossard BR, de Andrade M, Melton 3rd LJ (2008) Increased risk for parkinsonism or dementia in women who underwent oophorectomy before menopause. Neurology 70(3):200–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dill-Center Eitzenhöfer, Haupstraße 115, 35745 , Herborn, Deutschland

    Axel Valet Dr. med.

Authors
  1. Axel Valet Dr. med.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Zentrum Frauenheilkunde u. Geburtshilfe, Univ.Klinikum Marburg, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, 35033, Germany

    Uwe Wagner

  2. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Univ.Klinikum Marburg, Baldingerstr., Marburg, 35033, Germany

    Rainer Hofmann

  3. Marburg GmbH, Klinik Visceral-, Thor.- u. Gefäßchir., Universitätsklinikum Gießen und, Baldingerstraße, Marburg, Germany

    Detlef K. Bartsch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Valet, A. (2013). Konisation, Hysterektomie und Adnektomie. In: Wagner, U., Hofmann, R., Bartsch, D. (eds) Operationsatlas Gynäkologische Onkologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35128-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35128-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35127-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35128-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation