Skip to main content

RDL: Enhancing Description Logic with Rules

  • Conference paper
Book cover AI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7691))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3405 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we propose Rule Description Logic (RDL) for enhancing Description Logic (DL) with nonmonotonic recursive rules, like those in Answer Set Programming (ASP). We define the world view semantics for RDL and show that it is faithful with respect to both DL and ASP. More importantly, we show that the full language of RDL is decidable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Hollunder, B.: Embedding defaults into terminological knowledge representation formalisms. Journal of Automated Reasoning 14(1), 149–180 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonatti, P.A., Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: The complexity of circumscription in DLs. Journal of Artifical Intelligence Research 35, 717–773 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. de Bruijn, J., Eiter, T., Polleres, A., Tompits, H.: Embedding non-ground logic programs into autoepistemic logic for knowledge-base combination. In: IJCAI, pp. 304–309 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Bechhofer, S., Tsarkov, D.: OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation. Journal of Web Semantics 3(1), 23–40 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Grosof, B.N., Horrocks, I., Volz, R., Decker, S.: Description logic programs: combining logic programs with description logic. In: WWW, pp. 48–57 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A.: AL-log: Integrating datalog and description logics. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10(3), 227–252 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Motik, B., Rosati, R.: Reconciling description logics and rules. Journal of the ACM 57(5) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosati, R.: DL+log: Tight integration of description logics and disjunctive datalog. In: KR, pp. 68–78 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Eiter, T., Ianni, G., Lukasiewicz, T., Schindlauer, R., Tompits, H.: Combining answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. Artifial Intelligence 172(12-13), 1495–1539 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. de Bruijn, J., Pearce, D., Polleres, A., Valverde, A.: Quantified Equilibrium Logic and Hybrid Rules. In: Marchiori, M., Pan, J.Z., de Marie, C.S. (eds.) RR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4524, pp. 58–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lukasiewicz, T.: A novel combination of answer set programming with description logics for the semantic web. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22(11), 1577–1592 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., van Harmelen, F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a web ontology language. J. Web Sem. 1(1), 7–26 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: ICLP 1988, pp. 1070–1080 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, F., Zhou, Y.: From answer set logic programming to circumscription via logic of GK. Artifial Intelligence 175(1), 264–277 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferraris, P., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V.: Stable models and circumscription. Artifial Intelligence 175(1), 236–263 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Reiter, R.: A logic for default reasoning. Artifial Intelligence 13(1-2), 81–132 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gelfond, M.: Logic programming and reasoning with incomplete information. Annals of Maththematics and Artifial Intelligence 12(1-2), 89–116 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Lifschitz, V.: Minimal belief and negation as failure. Artifial Intelligence 70(1-2), 53–72 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhou, Y., Zhang, Y. (2012). RDL: Enhancing Description Logic with Rules. In: Thielscher, M., Zhang, D. (eds) AI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7691. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35101-3_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35101-3_48

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35100-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35101-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics