Skip to main content
  • 2111 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Zurzeit schätzen Experten, dass Facebook bei einem Börsengang mit einer Marktkapitalisierung von 100 Mrd. US$ rechnen könnte (WSJ 2011). Zwar konnte Facebook seinen Umsatz im Wesentlichen durch den Verkauf von klassischer Online-Werbung in der ersten Hälfte des Jahres 2011 verdoppeln, dennoch lässt sich der (prognostizierte) Unternehmenswert selbst bei einer ähnlich positiven weiteren Entwicklung kaum rechtfertigen. Investoren gehen offenbar davon aus, dass in Zukunft innovative Geschäftsmodelle zur Generierung von Erlösen gefunden werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Algesheimer R, Borle S, Dholakia UM, Singh SS (2010) The impact of customer community participation on customer behaviors: an empirical investigation. Mark Sci 29(4): 756–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS (1987) Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol 92(6): 1287–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H (1966) Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. Bobbs- Merrill Co., Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Facebook (2011) Facebook Statistics https://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics, abgerufen am 28.12.2011

  • Fischer C (1978) Urban-to-Rural Diffusion of Opinions in Contemporary America. Am J Sociol 84(1): 151–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-Created Word-of-Mouth Communication: Evidence from a Field Test. Mark Sci 28(4): 721–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg J, Han S, Lehmann DR, Hong JW (2009) The Role of Hubs in the Adoption Process. J Mark 73(March): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3): 481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal R, Mehta R, Kardes FR (2000) The Role of the Social-Identity Function of Attitudes in Consumer Innovativeness and Opinion Leadership. J Econ Psychol 21(3): 233–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz O, Spann M (2008) The Impact of Information Diffusion on Bidding Behavior in Secret Reserve Price Auctions. Information Systems Research 2008; 19(3): 351–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz O, Schulze C, Takac C (2013) New Product Adoption in Social Networks: Why Direction Matters, Journal of Business Research, forthcoming DOI: 10.1016/ j.jbusres. 2012.07.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinz O, Skiera B, Barrot C, Becker JU (2011) Seeding Strategies for Viral Marketing: An Empirical Comparison. J Mark 75(November): 55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsky D (1990) A Diffusion Model Incorporating Product Benefits, Price, Income and Information. Mark Sci 9(4): 342–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar R, Van den Bulte C, Valente TW (2011) Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion. Mark Sci 30(2): 195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan V, Muller E (1979) Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models in Marketing. J Mark 43: 55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF (1971) Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach. 2nd edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott J (2000) Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Song I, Chintagunta PK (2003) A Micromodel of New Product Adoption with Heterogeneous and Forward-Looking Consumers: Application to the Digital Camera Category. Q J Econ 1(4):371–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Anna R. (2010) Aigner warnt vor Marktmacht von Google und Co., Spiegel Online, http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,680858,00.html, abgerufen am 30.12.2011

  • Valente TW (1996) Social Network Thresholds in the Diffusion of Innovations. Social Networks 1996; 18(1): 69–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wassermann S, Faust K. (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • WSJ (2011) Facebook Targets Huge IPO, Wall Street Journal Online 29.11.2011. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203935604577066773790883672.html [abgerufen am 30.12.2011]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Gottschlich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gottschlich, J., Hinz, O. (2013). Der Wert von sozialen Strukturdaten aus ökonomischer Sicht. In: Anzinger, H., Hamacher, K., Katzenbeisser, S. (eds) Schutz genetischer, medizinischer und sozialer Daten als multidisziplinäre Aufgabe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34741-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34741-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34740-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34741-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics