The Diversity of Megacities Worldwide: Challenges for the Future of Mobility

  • Roland Priester
  • Jeffrey Kenworthy
  • Gebhard Wulfhorst
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mobility book series (LNMOB)


Megacities around the globe present bewildering combinations of transport patterns, transport infrastructure and other factors related to personal mobility. From the sprawling auto-dependent regions such as Los Angeles and Houston through the rail-based transit giants of Tokyo and Osaka, the informal-based public transport systems of Manila and Johannesburg, to the strong non-motorised sectors of Mumbai and the legendary traffic congestion of Bangkok, megacities are as diverse as they are many. But through this complexity and diversity, is it possible to find defining patterns? Can we simplify this perplexing picture? And through this process, is it possible to better understand and distinguish the array of mobility challenges that face such large cities? This chapter explores these questions through a cluster analysis of some 41 megacities across the globe, representing a vast range in wealth and other features. Exploiting The Millennium Cities Database for Sustainable Transport, which presents a very large, consistent and reliable set of transport and land use indicators for 100 cities worldwide, the study examines some 59 representative indicators covering land use and wealth characteristics, private, public and non-motorised mode mobility patterns, private and public transport infrastructure, transport investment patterns, transport energy use, transport externalities and other variables. The results suggest that megacities can be classified into six distinct types, which we have called Hybrid Cities, Transit Cities, Auto Cities, Non-Motorised Cities, Traffic-Saturated Cities and Paratransit Cities. The chapter provides a global mapping and description of these city-types, gives an overview on the variables used and the methodology for the cluster analysis and highlights the diversity of mobility patterns across these clusters by selected key variables. It explains how this advances our understanding of mobility in such cities. Finally, it presents the key mobility challenges that characterise each set of cities. The cluster results provided a framework for the selection of cities explored by scholars in the city mobility stories that form the major part of this book.


Public Transport Transport Infrastructure Road Infrastructure Public Transport System Private Transport 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Bacero R (2009) Assessment of jeepney’s components, systems and separate technical units for the developments of standards: proceedings of the 17th annual conference of the transportation science society of the Philippines, ManilaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bayan JM, Villoria OG, Ieda H (1995) Cost characteristics of bus and jeepney transport systems in metro Manila. National Center for Transportation Studies, University of the Philippines, discussion paper No. 6. ManilaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beijing Subway (2012) Company profile. Accessed: May 24, 2012
  4. 4.
    Bongardt D (2009) Stadtverkehr in Megacities. Bundeszentrale für Politische BildungGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bradley D, Kenworthy J (2012) Congestion offsets: transforming cities by letting buses compete: draft paper for world transport policy and practice 18(4):46–69Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cervero R, Landis J (1992) Suburbanisation of jobs and the journey to work: a submarket analysis of commuting in the San Francisco Bay area. J Adv Transp 26(3):275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dargay J, Gatley D, Sommer M (2007) Vehicle ownership and income growth, worldwide: 1960–2030. Energy J 28(4):143–170Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kenworthy J (2012) Moving to the dark side or will the force be with us?—a sustainability re-port card on trends in transport and urban development in thirty-three global cities, 1995–1996 to 2005–2006: Environmental Research Letters: Special issue: Environmental assessments in the built environmentGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kenworthy J, Laube F (2001) The millennium cities database for sustainable transport: (CDROM Database). International Union of Public Transport (UITP), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kenworthy J, Townsend C (2009) Montreal’s dualistic transport character: why mon-treal needs upgraded transit and not more high capacity roads. In: Gauthier P (ed) Montreal at the crossroads: superhighways, the turcot and the environment. Black Rose Books, Montreal, pp 29–35Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kraas F (ed) (2005) Megacities–our global urban future: earth sciences for society foundation. International Year for Planet Earth, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newman P, Kenworthy J (2011) Peak car use: understanding the demise of automobile dependence. World Transp Policy Pract 17(2):31–42Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Priester R, Kenworthy J, Wulfhorst G (2010) Mobility cultures in megacities: preliminary study, Technical University of MunichGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Puentes R, Tomer A (2008) The roadless traveled: an analysis of vehicle miles traveled trends in the U.S. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Satre GL (1998) The metro Manila LRT system—a historical perspective (PDF). Japan Railway Transp Rev 16:33–37 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tan P-N, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2005) Introduction to data mining. Person Addison-Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thomson J (1977) Great cities and their traffic. Gollancz, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA)–population division (2008) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2007 revision, United NationsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roland Priester
    • 1
  • Jeffrey Kenworthy
    • 2
  • Gebhard Wulfhorst
    • 1
  1. 1.Technische Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  2. 2.Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute (CUSP)Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations