m f, Abk → Masse

Macht → Autorität

Macintosh-Laryngoskop nt ( Open image in new window Macintosh laryngoscope); Gebogenes Endoskop* zur Untersuchung von Speiseröhre und Kehlkopf; Etym:griech: larynx, Kehle, Schlund, Speiseröhre / skopein, betrachten

Macula f, pl.-lae ( Open image in new window macula); Fleck, Verdickung; Etym:lat: macula, Fleck

Macula densaf ( Open image in new window macula densa); s.u. Apparat, juxtaglomerulärer;Etym:lat: densus, dicht

Maculae staticae f ( Open image in new window acustic maculae); Syn:Statokonien; Sinnesepithelbereich im häutigen Labyrinth*; Organ der Gleichgewichtsempfindung in der Macula sacculi* und Macula utriculi*; Etym:griech: statos, stehend

Macula lutea f ( Open image in new window macula lutea); Syn:gelber Fleck; Makula; Gelblicher Netzhautfleck; in der Mitte befindet sich eine gefäßreiche Einsenkung, die Fovea centralis; Ort des schärfsten Sehens; hier kommen nur Zapfenzellen vor; Etym:lat: luteus, gelb

Macula sacculi f ( Open image in new...


  1. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84: 191–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura A (1997) Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, FreemanGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura A (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior 31:143–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H et al. (2002) Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association 288: 2469–2475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G (2002) Self-controlled feedback: Does it enhance learning because performers get feedback when they need it? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 73: 408–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fasoli SE, Trombly CA, Tickle-Degnen L et al. (2002) Effect of instructions on functional reach in persons with and without cerebrovascular accident. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 56: 380–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Granados C, Wulf G (2007) Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: Contributions of observation and dialogue. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 78: 197–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartman JM (2007) Self-controlled use of a perceived physical assistance device during a balancing task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 104: 1005–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hellstrom K, Lindmark B, Wahlberg B, Fugl-Meyer AR (2003) Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 35: 202–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janelle CM, Barba DA, Frehlich SG et al. (1997) Maximizing performance effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 68: 269–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Landers M, Wulf G, Wallmann H et al. (2005) An external focus of attention attenuates balance impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Physiotherapy 91: 152–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee TD, Magill RA (1983) The locus of contextual interference in motor-skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 9: 730–746Google Scholar
  13. Lee TD, Simon DA (2004) Contextual interference. In: Williams MA, Hodges NJ (Hrsg.) Skill acquisition in sport. Routlegde, London and New York, 29–44Google Scholar
  14. Lee TD, Wishart LR (2005) Motor learning conundrums (and possible solutions). Quest 57: 67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lehto NK, Marley TL, Ezekiel HJ et al. (2001) Application of motor learning principles: the physiotherapy client as a Singer RN, Hausenblas HA, Janelle CM (Hrsg) Handbook of sport psychology. Wiley, New York, 205–238Google Scholar
  16. Pollock BJ, Lee TD (1992) Effects of the model’s skill level on observational learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 63: 25–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Resnik L, Jensen GM (2003) Using clinical outcomes to explore the theory of expert practice in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 83: 1090–1106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55: 68–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salmoni AW, Schmidt RA, Walter CB (1984) Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin 95: 355–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schmidt RA (1991) Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In: Requin J. Stelmach GE (Hrsg) Tutorials in motor neuroscience. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic, 59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis, Vol 4. Human Kinetics: Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharma L, Cahue S, Song J et al. (2003) Physical functioning over three years in knee osteoarthritis: role of psychosocial, local mechanical, and neuromuscular factors. Arthritis and Rheumatism 48: 3359–3370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shea JB, Morgan R (1979) Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 5: 179–187Google Scholar
  24. Swinnen S, Schmidt RA, Nicholson DE et al. (1990) Information feedback for skill acquisition: Instantaneous knowledge of results degrades learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 706–716Google Scholar
  25. Thompson CE, Wankel LM (1980) The effects of perceived activity choice upon frequency of exercise behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 10: 436–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Totsika V, Wulf G (2003) The influence of external and internal foci of attention on transfer to novel situations and skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 74: 220–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van der Linden DW, Cauraugh JH, Greene TA (1993) The effect of frequency of kinetic feedback on learning an isometric force production task in nondisabled subjects. Physical Therapy 73: 79–87Google Scholar
  28. Winstein CJ, Schmidt RA (1990) Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16: 677–691Google Scholar
  29. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Lewthwaite R (1994) Effects of physical guidance and knowledge of results on motor learning - Support for the guidance hypothesis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 65: 316–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Winstein CJ, Pohl PS, Cardinale C et al. (1996) Learning a partial-weight-bearing skill: Effectiveness of two forms of feedback. Physical Therapy 76: 985–993PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wulf G (2007) Self-controlled practice enhances motor learning: Implications for physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 93: 96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wulf G (2009) Aufmerksamkeit und Motorisches Lernen. Elsevier, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  33. Wulf G, Landers M, Lewthwaite R et al. (2009) External focus instructions reduce postural instability in individuals with Parkinson disease. Physical Therapy 89: 162–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wulf G, Lewthwaite R, Landers M, Töllner T (2009) The power of external focus instructions to enhance performance and learning. Physical Therapy 89: 170–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wulf G, McNevin NH, Shea CH (2001) The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A: 1143–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wulf G, Raupach M, Pfeiffer F (2005) Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 76: 107–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wulf G, Shea CH (2002) Principles derived form the study of simple motor skills do not generalize to complex skill learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9: 185–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wulf G, Shea CH (2004) Understanding the role of augmented feedback: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Williams AM, Hodges NJ (Hrsg) Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. Routledge, London, 121–144Google Scholar
  39. Wulf G, Toole T (1999) Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 70: 265–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fachhochschule OsnabrückOsnabrückDeutschland

Personalised recommendations