Advertisement

Requirements-Driven Log Analysis (Extended Abstract)

  • Klaus Havelund
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7641)

Background

Imagine that you are tasked to help a project improve their testing effort. In a realistic scenario it will quickly become clear, that having an impact is difficult. First of all, it will likely be a challenge to suggest an alternative approach which is significantly more automated and/or more effective than current practice. The reality is that an average software system has a complex input/output behavior. An automated testing approach will have to auto-generate test cases, each being a pair (i, o) consisting of a test input i and an oracle o. The test input i has to be somewhat meaningful, and the oracle o can be very complicated to compute. Second, even in the case where some testing technology has been developed that might improve current practice, it is then likely difficult to completely change the current behavior of the testing team unless the technique is obviously superior and does everything already done by existing technology.

Keywords

Temporal Logic Test Input Mars Science Laboratory NASA Ames Research Testing Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allan, C., Avgustinov, P., Christensen, A.S., Hendren, L., Kuzins, S., Lhoták, O., de Moor, O., Sereni, D., Sittamplan, G., Tibble, J.: Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJ. In: OOPSLA 2005. ACM Press (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barringer, H., Falcone, Y., Havelund, K., Reger, G., Rydeheard, D.: Quantified Event Automata: Towards Expressive and Efficient Runtime Monitors. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Méry, D. (eds.) FM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7436, pp. 68–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barringer, H., Groce, A., Havelund, K., Smith, M.: Formal analysis of log files. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication 7(11), 365–390 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barringer, H., Havelund, K.: TraceContract: A Scala DSL for Trace Analysis. In: Butler, M., Schulte, W. (eds.) FM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6664, pp. 57–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barringer, H., Havelund, K., Kurklu, E., Morris, R.: Checking flight rules with TraceContract: Application of a Scala DSL for trace analysis. In: Scala Days 2011. Stanford University, California (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barringer, H., Rydeheard, D.E., Havelund, K.: Rule systems for run-time monitoring: from Eagle to RuleR. J. Log. Comput. 20(3), 675–706 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forgy, C.: Rete: A fast algorithm for the many pattern/many object pattern match problem. Artificial Intelligence 19, 17–37 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Groce, A., Havelund, K., Smith, M.H.: From scripts to specifications: the evolution of a flight software testing effort. In: 32nd Int. Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2010), pp. 129–138. ACM SIG, Cape Town (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Havelund, K.: Closing the gap between specification and programming: VDM + +  and Scala. In: Korovina, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) HOWARD-60: Higher-Order Workshop on Automated Runtime Verification and Debugging. EasyChair Proceedings, Manchester, UK, vol. 1 (December 2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    LADEE: Lunar Atmosphere Dust Environment Explorer, http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LADEE/main
  11. 11.
    Meredith, P., Jin, D., Griffith, D., Chen, F., Roşu, G.: An overview of the MOP runtime verification framework. Software Tools for Technology Transfer (STTT) 14(3), 249–289 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    MSL: Mars Science Laboratory, http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl
  13. 13.
    SMAP: Soil Moisture Active Passive, http://smap.jpl.nasa.gov

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Havelund
    • 1
  1. 1.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyCaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations