Skip to main content

Clustering Users to Explain Recommender Systems’ Performance Fluctuation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7661))

Abstract

Recommender systems (RS) are designed to assist users by recommending them items they should appreciate. User based RS exploits users behavior to generate recommendations. Users act in accordance with different modes when using RS, so RS’s performance fluctuates across users, depending on their act mode. Act here includes quantitative and qualitative features of user behavior. When RS is applied in an e-commerce dedicated social network, these features include but are not limited to: user’s number of ratings, user’s number of friends, the items he chooses to rate, the value of his ratings, and the reputation of his friends. This set of features can be considered as the user’s profile.

In this work, we cluster users according to their acting profiles, then we compare the performance of three different recommenders on each cluster, to explain RS’s performance fluctuation across different users’ acting modes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burke, R.: Hybrid Web Recommender Systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 377–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Burke, R., Mobasher, B., Zabicki, R., Bhaumik, R.: Identifying attack models for secure recommendation. In: Beyond Personalization: A Workshop on the Next Generation of Recommender Systems (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steck, H.: Item popularity and recommendation accuracy. In: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys 2011), pp. 125–132. ACM, New York (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Resnick, P., Varian, H.R.: Recommender systems. Commun. ACM 40(3), 56–58 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller, B.N., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: PocketLens: Toward a personal recommender system. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(3), 437–476 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Massa, P., Bhattacharjee, B.: Using Trust in Recommender Systems: An Experimental Analysis. In: Jensen, C., Poslad, S., Dimitrakos, T. (eds.) iTrust 2004. LNCS, vol. 2995, pp. 221–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P., Riedl, J.: GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In: Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 1994), pp. 175–186. ACM, New York (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Golbeck, J., Hendler, J.: FilmTrust: movie recommendations using trust in web-based social networks (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maltz, D., Ehrlich, K.: Pointing the way: active collaborative filtering. In: Katz, I.R., Mack, R., Marks, L., Rosson, M.B., Nielsen, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1995), pp. 202–209. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Mobasher, B., Burke, R., Bhaumik, R., Williams, C.: Toward trustworthy recommender systems: An analysis of attack models and algorithm robustness. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 7(4), Article 23 (October 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lam, S.K., Riedl, J.: Shilling recommender systems for fun and profit. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2004), pp. 393–402. ACM, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. O’Mahony, M., Hurley, N., Kushmerick, N., Silvestre, G.: Collaborative recommendation: A robustness analysis. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 4(4), 344–377 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Golbeck, J.: Personalizing applications through integration of inferred trust values in semantic web-based social networks. In: Semantic Network Analysis Workshop at the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (November 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuter, U., Golbeck, J.: Using probabilistic confidence models for trust inference in Web-based social networks. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 10(2), Article 8, 23 pages (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ziegler, C.-N., Lausen, G.: Spreading Activation Models for Trust Propagation. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE 2004), pp. 83–97. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Herlocker, J.L., Konstan, J.A., Terveen, L.G., Riedl, J.T.: Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 22(1), 5–53 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Massa, P., Avesani, P.: Trust-Aware Collaborative Filtering for Recommender Systems. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) OTM 2004, Part I. LNCS, vol. 3290, pp. 492–508. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Haydar, C., Boyer, A., Roussanaly, A.: Hybridising collaborative filtering and trust-aware recommender systems. In: WEBIST 2012 - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, Porto, Portugal, April 18-21 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Haydar, C., Roussanaly, A., Boyer, A.: Analyzing Recommender System’s Performance Fluctuations across Users. In: Quirchmayr, G., Basl, J., You, I., Xu, L., Weippl, E. (eds.) CD-ARES 2012. LNCS, vol. 7465, pp. 390–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Alsabti, K., Ranka, S., Singh, V.: An efficient k-means clustering algorithm. Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Paper 43 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davies, D.L., Bouldin, D.W.: A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. 1, 224–227 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haydar, C., Roussanaly, A., Boyer, A. (2012). Clustering Users to Explain Recommender Systems’ Performance Fluctuation. In: Chen, L., Felfernig, A., Liu, J., Raś, Z.W. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7661. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34624-8_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34624-8_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34623-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34624-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics