Skip to main content

Quantized Fields and Their Interpretation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Quantum Physics

Abstract

This chapter deals with the quantum theory of systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom and provides elements of quantum field theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    After H. Yukawa who in 1936 predicted the existence of \(\pi \)-mesons from an interpretation of nuclear forces by the exchange of mesons, and from the range of these forces.

  2. 2.

    As the fields decrease sufficiently fast at infinity there is no loss of generality in assuming \(\varSigma \) to approach \(\varSigma _0\) smoothly at spatial infinity.

  3. 3.

    It would seem unfortunate to talk about “positive energy term” because then its adjoint would refer to negative energies, instead of negative frequencies. Free particles (or antiparticles) with mass \(m\) always have positive energy.

  4. 4.

    Strictly speaking, the integrals that one is dealing with are tempered distributions. However, all definitions for tempered distributions are chosen such that formal calculus follows the same rules as the calculus with functions and genuine integrals. This remark shows that the derivation of (7.60) as given here is correct.

  5. 5.

    The term “gauging” is used here in a figurative sense but alludes to genuine gauging, or rescaling, of a (real) metric, \(g_{\mu \nu } (x)\mapsto g^{\prime }(x)=\exp \{\lambda (x)\}g_{\mu \nu } (x)\). In fact, this was the context within which Hermann Weyl invented the notion of gauge transformation in 1919.

  6. 6.

    Turning one’s head to the right, and barring too much artistic scrutiny, one will recognize a seagull in Fig. 7.7.

  7. 7.

    Note that we had chosen the convention \(\varepsilon \) \(_{\scriptscriptstyle 0123}=+1\).

  8. 8.

    This condition was first found by Ludvig Valentin Lorenz (1829–1891), a Danish physicist, long before Hendrik Antoon Lorentz’ times to whom this relation is often but erroneously attributed.

  9. 9.

    In the case of Einstein’s equations for the gravitation field the analogous analysis shows that the graviton is massless and has spin/helicity 2.

  10. 10.

    The transition (\(\mathrm{{2s}}\rightarrow \mathrm{{1s}}\)) is possible through emission of two photons, or through a small relativistic term, unless it is induced by collisions with other atoms.

  11. 11.

    This is a detailed calculation which becomes more systematic by Wick’s theorem, cf. Theorem 5.1.

  12. 12.

    Presumably, no one would be tempted to treat the radiation emitted by an FM-radio station in the framework of quantum electrodynamics. As one easily estimates, the number of emitted photons per unit of volume is many orders of magnitude and, hence, very large as compared to \(1\).

  13. 13.

    A notable exception where this correction cannot be neglected are precision measurements by means of high-frequency spectroscopy. Such measurements are done in view of detecting radiative corrections as predicted by quantum electrodynamics. They are sensitive to even very small effects.

  14. 14.

    This flux factor would be 1 if the wave function were simply \(\mathrm{{e}}^{\mathrm{{i}}\varvec{k}\cdot \varvec{x}}\). If the covariantly normalized plane waves (7.19) are employed which have the property (7.20), then it is \(2E_{k}/(2\pi )^3\).

  15. 15.

    F. Strocchi, Phys. Rev. 162 (1967) 1429.

  16. 16.

    The ansatz \(D_1=c\;\square _q\delta ^{(4)}(q)\) is excluded as well. To see this calculate \(\int \mathrm{{d}}^4q\; (q^{\mu } q^{\nu } -q^2g^{\mu \nu } )D_1g(q) \propto g(0)\), which may be different from zero – in contradiction with the conclusion reached above.

  17. 17.

    It is not obvious that the commutator is indeed a \(c\)-number. This needs a detailed proof.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Scheck .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheck, F. (2013). Quantized Fields and Their Interpretation. In: Quantum Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34563-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34563-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34562-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34563-0

  • eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics