Skip to main content

OMP or BP? A Comparison Study of Image Fusion Based on Joint Sparse Representation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7667))

Abstract

In image fusion techniques based on joint sparse representation (JSR), the composite image is calculated from the fusion of features, which are represented with sparse coefficients. Orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) and basis pursuit (BP) are the main candidates to estimate the coefficients. Previously OMP is utilized for the advantage of low complexity. However, noticeable errors occur when the dictionary of JSR cannot ensure the coefficients are sparse enough. Alternatively, BP is more robust than OMP in such cases (though suffered from larger complexity). Unfortunately, it has never been studied in image fusion tasks. In this paper, we investigate JSR based on BP for image fusion. The target is to verify that 1) to what extent can BP outperform OMP; and 2) what is the trade-off between BP and OMP. Finally, we conclude, in some cases, fusion with BP obviously outperforms the one with OMP under an affordable computational complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Li, H., Manjunath, B.S., Mitra, S.K.: Multisensor Image Fusion Using the Wavelet Transform. Graphical Models and Image Processing 57(3), 235–245 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goshtasby, A.A., Nikolov, S.: Image Fusion: Advances in The State of The Art. Information Fusion 8(2), 114–118 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stathaki, T.: Image Fusion: Algorithms and Applications. Elsevier, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yin, H., Li, S.: Multimodal Image Fusion with Joint Sparsity Model. Optical Engineering (6) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, N., Qiu, T.S., Bi, F., Wang, A.Q.: Image Features Extraction and Fusion Based on Joint Sparse Representation. IEEE J. Selected Topics in Signal Processing 5(5), 1074–1082 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, S.S., Donoho, D.L., Saunders, M.A.: Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit. SIAM Review 43(1), 129–159 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Pati, Y.C., Rezaiifar, R., Krishnaprasad, P.S.: Orthogonal Matching Pursuit: Recursive Function Approximation with Applications to Wavelet Decomposition. In: Proc. 27th Annu. Asilomar Conf., Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, pp. 40–44 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Donoho, D.L., Elad, M., Temlyakov, V.N.: Stable Recovery of Spare Overcomplete Representations in the Presence of Noise. IEEE Trans. Information Theory 52(1) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elad, M.: Towards Average Performance Analysis. In: Sparse and Redundant Representations: From Theory to Applications in Signal and Image Processing, pp. 137–152. Springer, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duarte, M., Sarvotham, S., Baron, D., Wakin, M., Baraniuk, R.: Distributed Compressed Sensing of Jointly Sparse Signals. In: Proc. Asilomar Conf., Signals, Syst. Comput., Pacific Grove, pp. 1537–1541 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Efron, B., Hastie, T., Johnstone, I., Tibshirani, R.: Least Angle Regression. Annals of Statistics 32(2), 407–499 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, B., Li, S.: Multifocus Image Fusion and Restoration With Sparse Representation. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 59(4) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marial, J., Ponce, J., Sapiro, G.: Online Dictionary Learning for Sparse Coding. In: Proc. International Conference on Machine Learning, Montreal, Canada, pp. 689–696 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Online Resource for Research in Image Fusion, http://www.ImageFusion.org

  15. Xydeas, C.S., Petrovic, V.: Objective Image Fusion Performance Measure. Electronics Letters 36(4), 308–309 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sparse Modeling Software, http://spams-devel.gforge.inria.fr

  17. Carper, T.W., Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W.: The Use of Intensity-Hue-Saturation Transformations for Merging SPOT Panchromatic and Multispectral Image Data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 56, 459–467 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Akerman, A.: Pyramid Techniques for Multisensor Fusion. In: Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 1828, pp. 124–131 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, T., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y.: Remote Sensing Image Fusion Based on Ridgelet Transform. In: Proc. Geo. Remote Sens. IEEE Int. Symp., pp. 1150–1153 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nencini, F., Garzelli, A., Baronti, S., Alparone, L.: Remote Sensing Image Fusion Using The Curvelet Transform. Information Fusion 8(2), 143–156 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Do, M.N., Vetterli, M.: The Contourlet Transform: An Efficient Directional Multiresolution Image Representation. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 14(12), 2091–2106 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, B., Li, S.: Pixel-Level Image Fusion with Simultaneous Orthogonal Matching Pursuit. Information Fusion 13(1), 10–19 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yao, Y., Xin, X., Guo, P. (2012). OMP or BP? A Comparison Study of Image Fusion Based on Joint Sparse Representation. In: Huang, T., Zeng, Z., Li, C., Leung, C.S. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7667. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34500-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34500-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34499-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34500-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics