Advertisement

Rationality {in|for|through} AI

  • Tarek R. BesoldEmail author
Part of the Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics book series (TIEI, volume 4)

Abstract

Based on an assessment of the history and status quo of the concept of rationality within AI, I propose to establish research on (artificial) rationality as a research program in its own right, aiming at developing appropriate notions and theories of rationality suitable for the special needs and purposes of AI. I identify already existing initial attempts at and possible foundations of such an endeavor, give an account of motivations, expected consequences and rewards, and outline how such a program could be linked to efforts in other disciplines.

Keywords

Rational Behavior Human Rationality Positive Theory Rational Cognition Cognitive Science Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Besold, T.R.: Turing Revisited: A Cognitively-Inspired Decomposition. In: Müller, V.C. (ed.) Theory and Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. SAPERE (to appear, 2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Besold, T.R., Gust, H., Krumnack, U., Abdel-Fattah, A., Schmidt, M., Kühnberger, K.: An Argument for an Analogical Perspective on Rationality & Decision-Making. In: van Eijck, J., Verbrugge, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Reasoning About Other Minds: Logical and Cognitive Perspectives (RAOM 2011), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Groningen, The Netherlands, vol. 751, CEUR-WS.org (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Besold, T.R., Gust, H., Krumnack, U., Schmidt, M., Abdel-Fattah, A., Kühnberger, K.U.: Rationality Through Analogy - Towards a Positive Theory and Implementation of Human-Style Rationality. In: Troch, I., Breitenecker, F. (eds.) Proc. of MATHMOD 12, Vienna (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Besold, T.R., Kühnberger, K.U.: E Pluribus Multa In Unum: The Rationality Multiverse. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Binmore, K.: Rational Decisions. Princeton University Press (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broadie, S., Rowe, C. (eds.): Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics: Translation, Introduction, and Commentary. Oxford University Press (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Butterworth, R., Blandford, A.: The principle of rationality and models of highly interactive systems. In: Sasse, M.A., Johnson, C. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 1999, IOS Press (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byrne, R.: Suppressing valid inferences with conditionals. Cognition 31(1), 61–83 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clark, A.: Artificial Intelligence and the Many Faces of Reason. In: The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dawson, M.: Understanding Cognitive Science. Blackwell Publishing (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dixon, H.: Some Thoughts on Economic Theory and Artificial Intelligence. In: Surfing Economics: Essays for the Enquiring Economist, Palgrave (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doyle, J.: Rationality and its roles in reasoning. Computational Intelligence 8(2), 376–409 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Evans, J.: Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin 128, 978–996 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frantz, R., Simon, H.: Artificial intelligence as a framework for understanding intuition. Journal of Economic Psychology 24, 265–277 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galluppi, F., Urdiales, C., Sandoval, F., Olivetti, M.: A study on a shared control navigation system: human/robot collaboration for assisting people in mobility. Cognitive Processing 10(2), 215–218 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gardner, H.: Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Pachur, T. (eds.): Heuristics: The Foundation of Adaptive Behavior. Oxford University Press (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gilboa, I.: Questions in decision theory. Annual Reviews in Economics 2, 1–19 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gilboa, I., Schmeidler, D.: A Theory of Case-Based Decisions. Cambridge University Press (2001)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Griffiths, T., Kemp, C., Tenenbaum, J.: Bayesian Models of Cognition. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Cognitive Modeling. Cambridge University Press (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Halpern, J.Y.: Beyond Nash Equilibrium: Solution Concepts for the 21st Century. In: Proc. of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Halpern, J.Y., Pass, R.: Algorithmic rationality: Adding cost of computation to game theory. ACM SIGecom Exchanges 10(2), 9–15 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kokinov, B.: Analogy in decision-making, social interaction, and emergent rationality. Behavioral and Braind Sciences 26(2), 167–169 (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kooi, B.P.: Probabilistic dynamic epistemic logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 381–408 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mill, J.S.: On the definition of political economy, and on the method of investigation proper to it. In: Essays on Some Unsettled Questions of Political Economy, 2nd edn. Longmans, Green, Reader & Dyer (1874)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press (1994)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Petkov, G., Kokinov, B.: JUDGEMAP - integration of analogy-making, judgement, and choice. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci), pp. 1950–1955 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pollock, J.: Twenty Epistemological Self-profiles: John Pollock (Epistemology, Rationality and Cognition). In: A Companion to Epistemology, pp. 178–185. John Wiley and Sons (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rieskamp, J., Reimer, T.: Ecological rationality. In: Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, pp. 273–275. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Rooij, I.: The tractable cognition thesis. Cognitive Science 32, 939–984 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Rooij, I., Wright, C., Wareham, H.T.: Intractability and the use of heuristics in psychological explanations. Synthese (2010) (published online: November 11, 2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Russell, S.: Rationality and intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 94, 57–77 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Russell, S.J., Wefald, E.: Do the right thing - studies in limited rationality. MIT Press (1991)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sadek, M.D., Bretier, P., Panaget, F.: ARTIMIS: Natural dialogue meets rational agency. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1997, pp. 1030–1035. Morgan Kaufmann (1997)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Turing, A.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind LIX (236), 433–460 (1950)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review 90(4), 293–315 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang, P., Goertzel, B.: Introduction: Aspects of Artificial General Intelligence. In: Goertzel, B., Wang, P. (eds.) Advances in Artificial General Intelligence - Proc. of the AGI Workshop 2006, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications., vol. 157, pp. 1–16. IOS Press (2007)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wason, P.C., Shapiro, D.: Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 23(1), 63–71 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations