Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DUFICE: Guidelines for a Lightweight Management of Requirements Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Requirements Knowledge

Abstract

Working with requirements is a knowledge-intensive task. During the elicitation, comprehension, or management of requirements, practitioners often consume and produce additional information such as domain knowledge, rationale, requirements dependencies, “who knows what”, or how-to’s. However, current requirements engineering processes and tools lack a systematic support for the management of knowledge about requirements. This makes it difficult for practitioners to capture and share such knowledge.

This chapter summarises our experience on implementing a lightweight, pragmatic approach to capture and share requirements knowledge. We recommend practitioners to Draw a knowledge landscape, Use lightweight tools, Follow a simple iterative process, Interact with external communities, Capture tacit knowledge, and Establish a knowledge culture. We introduce these guidelines, report on motivating examples, and discuss how they can be applied successfully in practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Finkelstein A, Kramer J, Nuseibeh B, Finkelstein L, Goedicke M (1992) Viewpoints: a framework for integrating multiple perspectives in system development. Int J Softw Eng Knowl Eng 2–1:31–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alenljung B, Persson A (2005) Decision-making activities in the requirements engineering decision processes: a case study. In: ISD 2005, Karlstad, pp 707–718

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mavin A, Wilkinson P, Harwood A, Novak M (2009) Easy approach to requirements syntax (EARS). In: Requirements engineering conference, 2009, RE ’09, 17th IEEE international, Atlanta, USA, pp 317–322

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dutoit AH, McCall R, Mistrik I, Paech B (2006) Rationale management in software engineering: concepts and techniques. In: Rationale management in software engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–48

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rus I, Lindvall M, Sinha SS (2001) Knowledge management in software engineering a state-of-the-art-report. Fraunhofer Center for Experimental Software Engineering Maryland and the University of Maryland for Data and Analysis Center for Software, Department of Defence, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  6. Maalej W, Thurimella AK (2010) Managing requirements knowledge. International workshop on 2008–2010, IEEE. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=5611788

  7. Kiyavitskaya N, Zeni N, Mich L, Berry DM (2008) Requirements for tools for ambiguity identification and measurement in natural language requirements specifications. Requir Eng 13(3):207–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. IEEE Standard 1063–2001 (2001) IEEE standard for software user documentation, ISBN: 0-7381-3099-0

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma L, Nuseibeh B, Piwek P, De Roeck A, Willis A (2009) On Presuppositions in requirements. In: Proceedings of 2nd international workshop on managing requirements knowledge, MaRK’09 IEEE, Atlanta, USA, pp 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  10. CMMI DEV, CMMI for development v1.3 (2010) http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/10tr033.pdf

  11. Decker B, Ras E, Rech J, Jaubert P, Rieth R (2007) Wiki-based stakeholder participation in requirements engineering. In: IEEE software, vol 24-2, pp 28–35

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maalej W, Panagiotou D, Happel HJ (2008) Towards effective management of software knowledge exploiting the semantic wiki paradigm. In: Software Engineering, GI- LNI, Munich, Germany, vol 121, pp 183–197

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lucene Homepage (2012) http://jakarta.apache.org/lucene/

  14. Teamweaver Homepage (2012) http://www.teamweaver.org/

  15. Middleton C, Baeza-Yates R (2007) A comparison of open source search engines, TR. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Department of Technologies. http://wrg.upf.edu/WRG/dctos/Middleton-Baeza.pdf

  16. Udell S (2009) Pro web gadgets for mobile and desktop. Apress, Berkely

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Maalej W, Thurimella AK (2009) Towards a research agenda for recommendation systems in requirements engineering. In: MaRK’09, IEEE, Atlanta, USA, pp 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lutz R, Rouquette N (2010) Using defect reports to build knowledge in product lines. In: Proceedings of 3rd international workshop on managing requirements knowledge, IEEE, Sydney, Australia, pp 12–21

    Google Scholar 

  19. Juergens E, Deissenboeck F, Feilkas M, Hummel B et al (2010) Can clone detection support quality assessments of requirements specifications? In: Proceedings of ICSE’10, ACM, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 79–88

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lim SL, Damian D, Ishikawa F, Finkelstein A (2013) Using web 2.0 for stakeholder analysis: StakeSource and its application in ten industrial projects. In: Managing Requirements Knowledge, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  21. Felfernig A, Ninaus G, Grabner H, Reinfrank F, Weninger L, Pagano D, Maalej W (2012) An overview of recommender systems in requirements engineering. In: Managing Requirements Knowledge, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  22. Knauss E, Meyer S (2013) Experience-based requirements engineering tools. In: Managing Requirements Knowledge, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hansen MT (1999) The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm Sci Quart 44(1):82–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Drummond N, Shearer R (2006) The Open World Assumption – or Sometimes its nice to know what we don’t know, The University of Manchester. http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~drummond/presentations/OWA.pdf

  25. Poppendieck T, Poppendieck M (2003) Lean software development: an agile toolkit. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gallaro-Valencia R, Sim S (2009) Continuous and collaborative validation: field study of requirements knowledge in agile. In: Proceedings MaRK’09, Atlanta, USA

    Google Scholar 

  27. Newsletter der Fachgruppe Requirements Engineering (2012) https://mail.gi-ev.de/mailman/listinfo/re-newsletter

  28. Requirements Engineering Online Discussion Forum (2012) http://discuss.it.uts.edu.au/mailman/listinfo/re-online

  29. DXL forum (2012) http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/forums

  30. Seilevel message board (2012) www.seilevel.com/messageboard

  31. RE Wissen (2012) http://www.re-wissen.de/

  32. Mamykina, L, Manoim B, Mittal M, Hripcsak G, Hartmann B (2011) Design lessons from the fastest Q&A site in the west. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI ’11, ACM, Vancouver, Canada, pp 2857–2866

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gacitua R, Ma L, Nuseibeh B, Piwek P, de Roeck AN, Rouncefield M, Sawyer P, Willis A, Yang H (2009) Making tacit requirements explicit. In: Proceedings MaRK’09, Atlanta, USA, pp 40–44

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee J (1991) Extending the Potts and Bruns model for recording design rationale. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on software engineering (ICSE”13), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, pp 114–125

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gervasi V, Gacitua R, Rouncefield M, Sawyer P, Kof L, Ma L, Piwek P, Roeck A, Willis A, Yang H, Nuseibeh B (2013) Unpacking tacit knowledge for requirements engineering. In: Managing Requirements Knowledge, Springer

    Google Scholar 

  36. MacLean A, Young RM, Bellotti VME, Moran TP (1991) Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis. Hum Comput Interact 6(3–4):201–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kunz W, Rittel H (1970) Issues as elements of information systems, vol 131. University of California at Berkeley, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  38. Thurimella AK, Bruegge B (2007) Evolution in product line requirements engineering: a rationale management approach. In: RE 07, New Delhi, pp 254–257

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dutoit AH (1996) Rationale management in requirements engineering. Ph.D. dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hull E, Jackson K, Dick J (2004) Requirements engineering. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  41. Thurimella AK, Bruegge B, Creighton O (2008) Identifying and exploiting the similarities between rationale management and variability management. In: Proceedings 12th international software product line conference (SPLC 2008), Limerick, pp 99–108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Barbara Paech, Dennis Pagano, and Yang Li for the constructive and detailed reviews. We are also grateful to all MaRK’08–’10 participants and to our colleagues from the referred companies for the fruitful discussions and the feedback on early versions of this chapter. This work has been supported in part by the FastFix project and TEAM project, which are funded by the 6th and 7th Framework Programmes of the European Commission, Grant Agreement No. FP6-35111 and FP7-258109.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics/MOBIS, University of Hamburg, Vogt-Kölln-Str. 30, 22527, Hamburg, Germany

    W. Maalej

  2. Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH, Moosacher Str. 48, 80809, Munich, Germany

    A. K. Thurimella

Authors
  1. W. Maalej
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. K. Thurimella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Maalej .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics / MOBIS, University of Hamburg, Vogt-Kölln-Str. 30, Hamburg, 22527, Germany

    Walid Maalej

  2. Harman Becker Automotive Systems GmbH, Moosacher Str. 48, Munich, 80809, Germany

    Anil Kumar Thurimella

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maalej, W., Thurimella, A.K. (2013). DUFICE: Guidelines for a Lightweight Management of Requirements Knowledge. In: Maalej, W., Thurimella, A. (eds) Managing Requirements Knowledge. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34419-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34419-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34418-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34419-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation