Skip to main content

Towards a Course of Action Probability Ontology for Logistic Supply Destruction Operation

  • Conference paper
  • 1541 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 325))

Abstract

Military planning has been an increasingly complex activity that involves identifying the enemy and friendly multiple operation strategies to find effective COA determination to achieve desired effects. To address this issue, our work relies on probabilistic ontology which extends ontology to capture uncertainty in a principled and standardized way. Probabilistic OWL (PR-OWL) is an OWL upper ontology for representing probabilistic ontology. The design of the COA-Ontology strives to support course of action (COA) planning on the upper level of PR-OWL ontology classes. While the user-defined domain-specific classes that convey the equivalent of what a standard ontology is constructed beyond the COA ontology. This paper has proposed the preliminary design of a case of the logistic supply destruction operation (LSDO) for using probabilistic ontology to find effective courses of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Decision-making in C2: From a Person-Task Perspective. Valcartier, Canada (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matthews, K., Davies, M.: Simulations for joint military operations planning. In: Proceedings of SimTecT 2003, Adelaide, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ding, Z., Peng, Y.: A Probabilistic Extension to Ontology Language OWL. In: 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004), Big Island, Hawaii (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carvalho, R.N., Costa, P.C.G., Laskey, K.B., Chang, K.: PROGNOS: predictive situational awareness with probabilistic ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Information Fusion, Edinburgh, UK (July 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heckerman, D., Meek, C., Koller, D.: Probabilistic models for relational data. Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dorion, E., Matheus, C.J., Kokar, M.M.: Towards a Formal Ontology for Military Coalitions Operations. In: 10th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Costa, P., Laskey, K.B., Fung, F., Pool, M., Takikawa, M., Wright, E.: MEBN Logic: A Key Enabler for Network-Centric Warfare. In: 10th Annual Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. da Costa, P.C.G.: Bayesian Semantics for the Semantic Web. Doctoral Thesis, School of Information Technology and Engineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carvalho, R.N., Laskey, K.B., Costa, P.C.G.: PR-OWL 2.0 - Bridging the Gap to OWL Semantics. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web (URSW 2010), Collocated with the 9th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2010), pp. 73–84 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gruber, T.R.: Towards Principles for the design of ontonogies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43(4-5), 907–928 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Darr, T.P., Benjamin, P., Mayer, R.: Course of action planning ontology. In: Ontology for the Intelligence Community, OIC 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barclay, S., Brown, R.V., Kelly III, C., Peterson, C.R., Philips, L.D., Selvidge, J.: Handbook for Decision Analysis, AD-A049-221 N00014-76-C-0074 TR-77-6-30, Advanced Decision Technology Program Office of Naval Research (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Echevarria II, A.J.: Clausewitz’s centre of gravity: It’s not what we thought. Naval War College Review, 108–123 (Winter 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Das, B., Davies, M.: Causes-Effects-Consequences Framework for the Analysis of Foreign Command and Control Systems, DSTO research report, DSTO-RR-0229 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization: Standard for Military Scenario Definition Language (MSDL), SISO-STD-007-2008 (October 14, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Surdu, J.R., Kittka, K.: The Deep Green concept. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Spring Simulation Multiconference. The Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego, CA, April 14-17, pp. 623–631 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, X., Fan, Z., Yang, S., Huang, K. (2012). Towards a Course of Action Probability Ontology for Logistic Supply Destruction Operation. In: Xiao, T., Zhang, L., Fei, M. (eds) AsiaSim 2012. AsiaSim 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 325. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34387-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34387-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34386-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34387-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics