Skip to main content

Talking About Place Where it Matters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

This chapter poses questions towards a smart geographic communication: What is required to allow a person to talk to a machine in a natural way about geographic space, without learning a particular interface or structured form of dialog? And can the machine respond in a manner that a person would accept as human-like communication in its capacity of considering context? Where are the gaps in our current knowledge, for example as implemented in current systems, and where is more research needed?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    e.g., http://www.eworldwire.com/pressreleases/18186

  2. 2.

    http://www.abiresearch.com

References

  • Agarwal P (2004) Contested nature of place: knowledge mapping for resolving ontological distinctions between geographical concepts. In: Egenhofer M, Freksa C, Miller HJ (eds) Geographic information science, vol 3234., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawala M, Stolte C (2001) Rendering effective route maps: improving usability through generalization. In: SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM, Los Angeles, pp 241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlers D, Boll S (2008) Retrieving address-based locations from the web. In: Jones CB, Purves R (eds) Second international workshop on geographic information retrieval, ACM Press, Napa Valley, pp 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Alazzawi AN, Abdelmoty AI, Jones CB (2010) An ontology of place and service types to facilitate place-affordance geographic information retrieval. In: Purves R, Clough P, Jones CB (eds) Proceedings of the 6th workshop on geographic information retrieval, ACM, Zurich, Paper 4 (2 pages)

    Google Scholar 

  • ANZLIC (2009) National address management framework—glossary of terms. ANZLIC, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle (350BC) Physics (trans: Hardie RP, Gaye RK). eBooks@Adelaide. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett B (2001) Application of supervaluation semantics to vaguely defined spatial concepts. In: Montello DR (ed) Spatial information theory, vol 2205., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 108–123

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett B, Agarwal P (2007) Semantic categories underlying the meaning of ‘place’. In: Winter S, Duckham M, Kulik L, Kuipers B (eds) Spatial information theory, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4736. Springer, Berlin, pp 78–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, Frank AU (eds) (1996) Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries, vol 2. ESF-GISDATA. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati R, Varzi AC (1999) Parts and places: the structures of spatial representation. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppock JT, Rhind DW (1991) The history of GIS. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical information systems: principles and applications, vol 1. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow, pp 21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H (1992) Location, place, region, and space. In: Abler RF, Marcus MG, Olson JM (eds) Geography’s inner worlds. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, pp 215–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Cresswell T (2004) Place: a short introduction. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton NS (2007) Is Neighbourhood measurable? In: Kubat AS (ed) 6th international space syntax symposium, Istanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton NSC (2006) Configuration and neighbourhood: is place measurable? In: Hölscher C, Conroy Dalton R, Turner A (eds) Space syntax and spatial cognition, SFB TR8 Spatial Cognition, Bremen, Germany, pp 53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies C, Holt I, Green J, Harding J, Diamond L (2009) User needs and implications for modelling vague named places. Spatial Cognit Comput 9(3):174–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly M (2005) Relative places. Appl Ontol 1(1):55–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckham M, Winter S, Robinson M (2010) Including landmarks in routing instructions. J Locat-Based Services 4(1):28–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwardes AJ, Purves R (2007) A theoretical grounding for semantic descriptions of place. In: Web and wireless geographical information systems, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4857. Springer, pp 106–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer MJ, Franzosa RD (1991) Point-set topological spatial relations. Int J Geograph Inf Syst 5(2):161–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank AU, Mark DM (1991) Language issues for geographical information systems. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical information systems: principles and applications, vol 1. Longman, London, pp 147–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Freksa C (1991) Qualitative spatial reasoning. In: Mark DM, Frank AU (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space. NATO ASI series d: behavioural and social sciences. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, pp 361–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (2010) Twenty years of progress: GI Science in 2010. J Spatial Info Sci 1(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (1993) From space to place and back again: reflections on the condition of postmodernity. In: Bird J, Curtis B, Putnam T, Robertson G, Tickner L (eds) Mapping the futures: local cultures. Global Change, Routledge, pp 3–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Herskovits A (1986) Language and spatial cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill LL (2006) Georeferencing: the geographic associations of information. Digital Libraries and Electronic Publishing, The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges F (2007) Language planning and place naming in Australia. Curr Issues Lang Plan 8(3):383–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Smith A, Batty M, Crooks AT, Milton R (2009) Mapping for the masses: accessing Web2.0 through crowdsourcing. Soc Sci Comp Rev 27(4):524–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janelle DG (2004) Impact of information technologies. In: Hanson S, Giuliano G (eds) The geography of urban transportation. Guilford Press, New York, pp 86–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Janowicz K, Raubal M, Kuhn W (2011) The semantics of similarity in geographic information retrieval. J Spatial Info Sci 1(2):29–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvella RJ, Klein W (eds) (1982) Speech, place, and action. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones CB, Alani H, Tudhope D (2001) Geographical information retrieval with ontologies of place. In: Montello DR (ed) Spatial information theory, vol 2205., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 322–335

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CB, Purves RS, Clough PD, Joho H (2008) Modeling vague places with knowledge from the web. Int J Geograph Info Sci 22(10):1045–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodziej KW, Hjelm J (2006) Local positioning systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn W (2005) Geospatial semantics: why, of what, and how? In: Spaccapietra S, Zimanyi E (eds) Journal of data semantics III, vol 3534., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik L (2001) A geometric theory of vague boundaries based on supervaluation. In: Montello DR (ed) Spatial information theory, vol 2205., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 44–59

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson SC (1996) Frames of reference and molyneux’s question: crosslinguistic evidence. In: Bloom P, Peterson MA, Nadel L, Garrett MF (eds) Language and space. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 109–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchette SA, Shelton AL (2010) Object properties and frame of reference in spatial memory representations. Spatial Cogn Comput 10(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM, Frank AU (1991) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space, vol 63., Nato ASI series d: behavioural and social sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM, Smith B, Tversky B (1999) Ontology and geographic objects: an empirical study of cognitive categorization. In: Freksa C, Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory, vol 1661., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 283–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM, Turk AG, Stea D (2007) Progress on yindjibarndi ethnophysiography. In: Winter S, Duckham M, Kulik L, Kuipers B (eds) Spatial information theory, vol 4736., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGranaghan M (1991) Matching representations of geographic locations. In: Mark DM, Frank AU (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space, vol 63., NATO ASI series d: behavioural and social sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 387–402

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller HJ (2005) Place-based versus people-based accessibility. In: Levinson D, Krizek KJ (eds) Access to destinations. Elsevier, London, pp 63–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR (1993) Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Frank AU, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory, vol 716., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 312–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello DR, Goodchild MF, Gottsegen J, Fohl P (2003) Where’s downtown? behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spatial Cogn Comput 3(2&3):185–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Nothegger C, Winter S, Raubal M (2004) Computation of the salience of features. Spatial Cogn Comput 4(2):113–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes J (1991) Geographic space as a set of concrete geographical entities. In: Mark DM, Frank AU (eds) Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space, vol 63., NATO ASI series d: behavioural and social sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 9–33

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe J (2003) Vector grammar, places, and the functional role of the spatial prepositions in english. In: van der Zee E, Slack J (eds) Representing directions in language and space. Oxford Linguistics. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 69–85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11(5):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pylyshyn ZW (2007) Things and places: how the mind connects with the world. The Jean Nicod lectures. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Randell DA, Cui Z, Cohn A (1992) A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Brachmann R, Levesque H, Reiter R (eds) Third international conference on the principles of knowledge representation and reasoning. Morgan-Kaufmann, Los Altos, pp 165–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Relph EC (1976) Place and placelessness. Pion Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Retscher G, Kealy A (2006) Ubiquitous positioning technologies for modern intelligent navigation systems. J Navigation 59(1):91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retz-Schmidt G (1988) Various views on spatial prepositions. AI Magazine 9(2):95–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter K-F, Tomko M, Winter S (2008) A dialog-driven process of generating route directions. Comput Environ Urban Syst 32(3):233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter K-F, Winter S (2011) Citizens as database: conscious ubiquity in data collection. In: Pfoser D, Tao Y, Mouratidis K et al (eds) Symposium on spatial and temporal databases (SSTD), vol 6849., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 445–448

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodaway P (1994) Sensouous geographies: body, sense, and place. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scharl A, Stern H, Weichselbraun A (2008) Annotating and visualizing location data in geospatial web applications. In: Boll S, Jones CB, Kansa E et al (eds) First international workshop on location and the web, ACM Press, Beijing, pp 65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheider S, Janowicz K (2010) Places as media of containment. In: GIScience 2010 extended abstracts, University of Zurich, Zurich, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlieder C, Matyas C (2009) Photographing a city: an analysis of place concepts based on spatial choices. Spatial Cogn Comput 9(3):212–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid F (2008) Knowledge-based wayfinding maps for small display cartography. J Locat Based Services 2(1):57–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid F, Kuntzsch C, Winter S, Kazerani A, Preisig B (2010) Situated local and global orientation in mobile you-are-here maps. In: de Sa M, Carrico L, Correia N (eds) 12th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI), ACM Press, Lisbon, pp 83–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid F (2006) Richter K-F extracting places from location data streams. In: Zipf A (ed) Second international workshop on ubiquitous geographical information services. Münster, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke H (2003) A geometry for places: representing extension and extended objects. In: Kuhn W, Worboys MF, Timpf S (eds) Spatial information theory, vol 2825., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 221–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezuka T, Yokota Y, Iwaihara M, Tanaka K (2004) Extraction of cognitively-significant place names and regions from web-based physical proximity co-occurrences. In: Zhou X, Su S, Papazoglou MP, Orlowska ME, Jeffrey KG (eds) Web information systems—WISE 2004, vol 3306., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–124

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tomko M, Winter S (2009) Pragmatic construction of destination descriptions for urban environments. Spatial Cogn Comput 9(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuan Y-F (1977) Space and place: the perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky B (2003) Places: points, planes, paths, and portions. In: van der Zee E, Slack J (eds) Representing directions in language and space. Oxford Linguistics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 132–143

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky B, Lee PU (1998) How space structures language. In: Freksa C, Habel C, Wender KF (eds) Spatial cognition, vol 1404., Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 157–175

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Twaroch F, Jones CB, Abdelmoty AI (2008) Acquisition of a vernacular gazetteer from web sources. In: Boll S, Jones CB, Kansa E et al. (eds) First international workshop on location and the web, ACM Press, Beijing, pp 61–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Virrantaus K, Fairbairn D, Kraak MJ (2009) ICA research agenda on cartography and GI science. The Cartograph J 46(2):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallgrün JO, Frommberger L, Wolter D, Dylla F, Freksa C (2007) A toolbox for qualitative spatial representation and reasoning. In: Barkowsky T, Knauff M, Ligozat G, Montello DR (eds) Spatial cognition V: reasoning, action, interaction, vol 4387., Lecture notes in artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, pp 39–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Want R, Schilit B (2001) Expanding the horizons of location-aware computing. IEEE Comp J 34(8):31–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor G (2009) The recognition of aboriginal placenames in New South Wales. In: Koch H, Hercus L (eds) Aboriginal placenames: naming and re-naming the Australian landscape. ANU E Press, Canberra, pp 70–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S (2003) Route adaptive selection of salient features. In: Kuhn W, Worboys MF, Timpf S (eds) Spatial information theory, vol 2825., Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 320–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Kuhn W, Krüger A (2009) Does place have a place in geographic information science? Spatial Cogn Comput 9(3):171–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter S, Wu Y (2009) Intelligent spatial communication. In: Navratil G (ed) Research trends in geographic information science. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–250

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Worboys MF (2001) Nearness relations in environmental space. Int J Geograph Info Sci 15(7):633–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Brian Marwick, Yvonne Thompson, Greg Windsor and Laura Kostanski for valuable discussions in earlier stages, and the participants at Las Navas 2010 and anonymous reviewers for feedback on drafts of these ideas. Also funding from the Australian Research Council, DP0878119 and LP100200199, is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Winter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winter, S., Truelove, M. (2013). Talking About Place Where it Matters. In: Raubal, M., Mark, D., Frank, A. (eds) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics