Skip to main content

The Cognitive Development of the Spatial Concepts NEXT, NEAR, AWAY and FAR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

Previous research on the cognitive development of locatives by English speakers, spatial concepts such as in, on, between, over and across has focused primarily on young children’s understanding of relatively few locatives and only in small-scale spaces. Subsequently, these studies provide limited insight into the comprehension of locatives in general, the results are relevant to spatial relationships in only one spatial context, the studies provide little data about the development of spatial concept understanding beyond the childhood, and they therefore do not adequately address the relationship between spatial developmental theory and spatial concept understanding. In response, we examined the use of locatives in two spatial contexts: a tabletop layout and a large model space. Child (3, 4, 5, 7 and 9 years-old) and adult (control) participants placed, according to various instructions, objects within one of the two model spaces. This chapter focuses on one aspect of this study: locatives that have implicit reference to distance. We specifically explore the locatives NEXT, NEAR, AWAY and FAR in two spatial contexts. Results indicate that spatial context influences people’s conceptions of locatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailystock H, Codd Z (1987) Children’s interpretation of ambiguous spatial descriptions. Br J Dev Psychol 5:205–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blades M, Spencer C, Plester B, Desmond K (2003) Young children’s recognition and representation of urban landscapes from aerial photographs and in toy play. In: Evans G (ed) Remembering where: advances in understanding spatial memory. Erlbaum, Hilldsale, pp 287–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaut JM (1997) Children can. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 87:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaut J, Stea D (1973) Some preliminary observations on learning in school children. In: Downs R, Stea D (eds) Image and environment. Aldine, Chicago, pp 226–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowerman M, Choi S (2001) Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41(1–3):83–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremner G, Idowu T (1987) Constructing favorable conditions for measuring the young child’s understanding of the terms in, on and under. Int J Behav Dev 10:89–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant DJ, Tversky B, Franklin N (1992) Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. J Mem Lang 31:74–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casasola M, Cohen LB, Chiarello E (2003) Six-month-old infants’ categorization of containment spatial relations. Child Dev 74:679–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi S, Bowerman M (1991) Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41:83–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen R (1985) The development of spatial cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner P, Chapman T (1985) The development of locative comprehension in Spanish. J Child Lang 12:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couclelis H, Golledge R, Gale R, Tobler W (1987) Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. J Environ Psychol 7:99–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox MV, Isard S (1990) Children’s deictic and non-deictic interpretations of the spatial locatives ‘In Front Of’ and ‘Behind’. J Child Lang 17:481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs RM, Liben LS (1997) Piagetian pessimism and the mapping abilities of young children. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 87:168–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkin K (1981) Aspects of late language acquisition: school children’s use and comprehension of prepositions. First Lang 2:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin N, Tversky B (1990) Searching imagined environments. J Exp Psychol Gen 119:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh SM (2000) Micro- and macro-scale environments. In: Kitchin R, Freundschuh SM (eds) Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future. Routledge Inc, New York, pp 124–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh SM (1992) Is there a relationship between spatial cognition and environmental patterns? In: Frank AU, Campari I, Formentini U (eds) Theories and methods of spatial-temporal reasoning in geographic space. Springer, New York, pp 288–304

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh SM, Blades M (1998) Put the horse NEXT to the lake and FAR from the water tower: the development of locative understanding in large- and small-scale model spaces. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, Boston, MA, pp 25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh SM, Blades M (1997) Locative understanding in large-scale, geographic environments. In: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC, pp 6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh SM, Egenhofer MJ (1997) Human Conceptions of Spaces: implications for geographic information systems. Trans GIS 2(4):361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh SM, Mark DM, Gopal S, Gould M, Couclelis H (1990) Verbal directions for wayfinding: implications for navigation and geographic information and analysis systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on spatial data handing, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 478–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundschuh SM, Sharma M (1996) Spatial image schemata, locative terms and geographic spaces in children’s narrative: fostering spatial skills in children. Cartogr Monogr 46, Orienting Ourselves Space: Implic Sch Curric 32(2):38–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D, Bowerman M (2009) Why some spatial semantic categories are harder to learn than others: the typological prevalence hypothesis. In: Guo J, Lieven E, Erivin-Tripp S, Budwig N, Ozcaliskan S, Nakamura K (eds) Crosslinguistic approaches to the psychology of language: Research in the tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, pp 465–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermer-Vazquez L, Spelke ES, Katsnelson AS (1999) Sources of flexibility in human cognition: dual-task studies of space and language. Cogn Psychol 39:3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher J, Newcombe N (1984) The child’s representation of information about location. In: Sophian C (ed) Origins of cognitive skills. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 81–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JR (1988) Children’s verbal representation of spatial location. In: Stiles-Davis J, Kritchevsky M, Bellugi U (eds) Spatial cognition: Brain bases and development. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 195–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston JR (1984) Acquisition of locative meanings: behind and in front of. J Child Lang 11:407–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston J, Slobin D (1979) The development of locative expressions in English, Italian, Serbo-Croatian and Turkish. J Child Lang 6:529–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau B, Jackendoff R (1993) ‘What’ and ‘where’ in spatial language and cognition. Behav Brain Sci 16:217–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch K (1960) Image of the city. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM (1999) Spatial representation: a cognitive view. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW, Longley P (eds) Geographical information systems: principles and applications, 2nd edn. pp 1, 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM, Egenhofer MJ (1994) Modeling spatial relations between lines and regions: Combining formal mathematical modes and human subjects testing. Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst 21(3):195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark DM, Frank AU (1992) NCGIA initiative 2 “Languages of Spatial Relations” closing report. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  • Montello D (1998) Scale and detail in the cognition of geographic information. Report online: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/varenius/scale/

  • Montello D (1993) Scale and multiple psychologies of space. In: Frank A, Campari I (eds) Spatial information theory: a theoretical basis for GIS. Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp 716(312–321), Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J, Inhelder B (1967) A child’s conception of space (trans: Langdon FJ, Lunzer JL). Norton, New York (Original work published 1948)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plester B (2004) Small people thinking about big spaces: young children’s navigational use of aerial photographs. In: Catling S, Martin F (eds) Researching primary geography. Register of Research in Primary Geography, London, pp 151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Plester B, Blades M, Spencer C (2005) Children’s understanding of environmental representations: Aerial photographs and model towns. In: Blades M, Spencer C (eds) Children and their environments: learning, using and designing spaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 42–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Plester B, Blades M, Spencer C (2003) Children’s understanding of aerial photographs. Child Geogr 1(2):281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms N, Gentner D (2008) Spatial language and landmark use: can 3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds find the middle? In: Love BC, McRae K, Sloutsky VM (eds) Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the cognitive science society, Cognitive Science Society, Austin, pp 191–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowden S, Blades M (1996) Children’s use of the spatial terms ‘near to’ and ‘next to’. First Lang 16:247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer C, Blades M (eds) (2005) Children and their environments: learning, using, and designing spaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor H, Tversky B (1992) Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. J Mem Lang 31:261–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke PW, Hayes-Roth B (1982) Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cogn Psychol 12:137–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky B (1981) Distortions in memory for maps. Cogn Psychol 13:407–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky B, Morrison J, Franklin N, Bryant D (1999) Three spaces of spatial cognition. Prof Geogr 51(4):516–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid of Research, Artistry and Scholarship from the University of Minnesota (#16783) and from support from the University of Sheffield; support from the University of Minnesota and the University of Sheffield is gratefully acknowledged. We also acknowledge the hard work of Linda Peterson, Brea Hallman and Jennifer Ruzicka who spent many months collecting data for exp#1, and James Lehnhoff who collected data for exp#2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Freundschuh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freundschuh, S., Blades, M. (2013). The Cognitive Development of the Spatial Concepts NEXT, NEAR, AWAY and FAR. In: Raubal, M., Mark, D., Frank, A. (eds) Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Space. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34359-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics