Skip to main content

Individual Paths in Self-evaluation Processes

  • Conference paper
Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems (ISICA 2012)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 316))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2209 Accesses

Abstract

A large number of approaches for evaluating students’ knowledge are made available by the research community. Much less is known when it comes to discussing qualities of assessment materials. In this work we propose use of graphical representations of individual paths in self-evaluation processes for unveiling dependences between tests’ content, alternative answers and learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beauchamp, G., Kennewell, S.: Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers & Education 54(3), 759–766 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlsson, C., Fuller, R.: Optimization under the fuzzy if-then rules. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 119(1) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Colace, F., De Santo, M., Vento, M.: A Personalized Learning Path Generator Based on Metadata Standards. International Journal on E-Learning, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education 4(3), 317–335 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chi, M., VanLehn, K., Litman, D.J.: Do Micro-Level Tutorial Decisions Matter: Applying Reinforcement Learning to Induce Pedagogical Tutorial Tactics. Intelligent Tutoring Systems (1), 224–234 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deng, J.L.: Introduction to grey system theory. Journal of Grey Systems 1, 1–24 (1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fuller, R., Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy reasoning for solving fuzzy mathematical programming problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 60, 121–133 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gursula, F., Tozmaza, G.B.: Which one is smarter? Teacher or Board. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 2, 5731–5737 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrmann, C.S.: Fuzzy Logic as Inferencing Techniques in Hybrid AI-Systems. In: Martin, T., L. Ralescu, A. (eds.) IJCAI-WS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1188, pp. 69–80. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hu, Y.C.: Grey relational analysis and radical basis function network for determining costs in learning sequences. Applied Mathematics and Computation 184, 291–299 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lei, Y., Wang, Y., Cao, B., Yu, J.: Concept Interconnection Based on Many-Valued Context Analysis. In: Zhou, Z.-H., Li, H., Yang, Q. (eds.) PAKDD 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4426, pp. 623–630. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, J., Yao, X.: Formal concept analysis of incomplete information system. In: Seventh International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), pp. 2016–2020 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, vol. 9. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough mereological approach to knowledge-based distributed AI. In: Lee, J.K., Liebowitz, J., Chae, J.M. (eds.) Third World Congress on Expert Systems, Soeul, Korea, February 5-9, pp. 774–781 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough mereology: A new paradigm for approximate reasoning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 15(4), 333–365 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Polkowski, L., Skowron, A.: Rough mereology in information systems. A case study: Qualitative spatial reasoning. In: Polkowski, L., Lin, T.Y., Tsumoto, S. (eds.) Rough Set Methods and Applications: New Developments in Knowledge Discovery in Information Systems. STUDFUZZ, vol. 56, ch. 3, pp. 89–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rahimnia, F., Moghadasian, M., Mashreghi, E.: Application of grey theory organizational approach to evaluation of organizational vision. Grey Systems: Theory and Application 1(1), 33–46 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Torff, B., Rose Tirotta, R.: Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education 54(2), 379–383 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Encheva, S. (2012). Individual Paths in Self-evaluation Processes. In: Li, Z., Li, X., Liu, Y., Cai, Z. (eds) Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems. ISICA 2012. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 316. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34289-9_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34289-9_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34288-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34289-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics