Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Euro-Mediterranean Conference

EuroMed 2012: Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation pp 221–230Cite as

Monument Damage Ontology

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7616))

Abstract

Capturing knowledge about damages and failures of culture heritage objects is a complex task because of term ambiguity, knowledge incompleteness and variety. To tackle this complexity, the paper introduces a semantic web ontology that aims at modeling monument damage knowledge with significant contextual information, including monument identification, damage identification, risk assessment, damage diagnosis and remedial measures. The developed ontology is being tested in the MONDIS project as a background knowledge for custom software tools for management of damage failure knowledge. During the course of the project it becomes a common model for linked-data-compliant knowledge-based system serving different stakeholders to model/retrieve/compare different cases of damage and successful interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Doerr, M.: Ontologies for Cultural Heritage. Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 463–486. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space, 1st edn. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology. Morgan & Claypool (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B.: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax. W3C Recommendation, W3C (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-syntax-20091027 (cit. January 11, 2012)

  4. ICOMOS: International Charters for Conservation and Restoration, http://www.international.icomos.org/charters/charters.pdf (cit. June 11, 2012)

  5. Ioannides, M.: Heritage in the Digital Era. Multi-Science Publishing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. ISCARSAH: Recommendations for the Analysis Conservation and Structural Restoration of Architectural Heritage, Guidelines, http://iscarsah.icomos.org (cit. June 11, 2012)

  7. Douglas, J., Ransom, W.: Understanding Building Failures. Taylor & Francis (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. MiBAC: Progetto Monitoraggio sullo Stato di Consevazione dei Beni Architettonici Tutelati: Documento di Sintesi (online in italian), http://www.beniculturali.it (cit. June 11, 2012)

  9. Council of Europe: Core Data Index to Historic Buildings and Monuments of the Architectural Heritage. Documenting the Cultural heritage (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. CIDOC: Core Sata Standard for Archaeological Sites and Monuments. Documenting the Cultural heritage (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. ICOM-CIDOC: Lightweight Information Describing Objects, http://network.icom.museumcidoc.html (cit. June 11, 2012)

  12. CIDOC: CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, http://www.cidoc-crm.org (cit. June 2, 2012)

  13. Getty Research Institute: Cultural Objects Name Authority, http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/index.html (cit. June 11, 2012)

  14. Janberg, N.: International database and Gallery of Structures, http://en.structurae.de/index.cfm (cit. June 11, 2012)

  15. Drdácký, M., Valach, J., Křemen, P., Abrahamčík, J.: Cultural Heritage Protection Against Flooding. In: Damage Database. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, pp. 185–195 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Snethlage, R.: Illustrated glossary on stone deterioration patterns. Monuments and sites. In: ICOMOS, ISCS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Porter, K.A.: A Taxonomy of Building Components for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering. University of California, Berkeley (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. BauDataWeb: The FreeClass Ontology for Construction and Building Materials and Services, http://www.freeclass.eu/freeclass_v1.html (cit. March 21, 2012)

  19. ONSITEFORMASONRY: Standard Damage Catalogue and List of Structural Typologies and Related Requirements. In: International Symposium NDT-CE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. RTS: Jednotná klasifikace stavebních objektů, http://www.stavebnistandardy.cz/default.asp?Bid=1&ID=1 (cit. June 12, 2012)

  21. RTS: Třídník stavebních konstrukcí a prací, http://80.83.66.232/doc/zakladna/tridnik_tskp.htm (cit. June 12, 2012)

  22. Křemen, P., Mička, P., Šmíd, M., Blaško, M.: Ontology-driven Mindmapping. To appear in Proceedings of I-SEMANTICS 2012 (September 2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technická 2, 16627, Praha, Czech Republic

    Miroslav Blaško, Petr Křemen & Zdeněk Kouba

  2. Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prosecká 76, 19000, Praha, Czech Republic

    Riccardo Cacciotti

Authors
  1. Miroslav Blaško
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Riccardo Cacciotti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Petr Křemen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zdeněk Kouba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Electrical and Computer Engineering and Informatics, Digital Heritage Laboratory, Cyprus University of Technology (CUT), ArchbishopKyprianou 31, 3036, Limassol, Cyprus

    Marinos Ioannides

  2. Institut für Photogrammetrie, Universität Stuttgart, Geschwister-Scholl-Straße 24D, 70174, Stuttgart, Germany

    Dieter Fritsch

  3. Fraunhofer Institute, Scientific Representative for Fraunhofer IAP, IBP, ICT, IGB, ISC, IST & MOEZ, Research Alliance Cultural Heritage and Sustainability Network, Rue du Commerce 31, 1000, Brussels, Belgium

    Johanna Leissner

  4. MDR Partners (Consulting) Ltd., 2B Fitzgerald Road, SW14 8HA, London, UK

    Rob Davies

  5. 3D Optical Metrology Unit FBK, Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK), Via Sommarive 18, 38123, Trento, Italy

    Fabio Remondino

  6. Istituto Centrale per il Catalogo Unico delle Biblioteche Italiane, Viale del Castro Pretorio 105, 185, Rome, Italy

    Rossella Caffo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Blaško, M., Cacciotti, R., Křemen, P., Kouba, Z. (2012). Monument Damage Ontology. In: Ioannides, M., Fritsch, D., Leissner, J., Davies, R., Remondino, F., Caffo, R. (eds) Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. EuroMed 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7616. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34233-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34234-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation