Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

Similar to the oft cited term “manufacturing footprint”, network configuration deals with the physical design of the network, and the capabilities of the sites on that network. In this chapter we will hence deal first of all with network structure and network specialisation. Following this, we will take an in-depth look at site specialisation in the form of site roles. The configuration of technological resources within the network and the internal supply chain conclude the design dimension of the network configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example Hayes et al. (2005), p. 142f; De Meyer and Vereecke (1994), p. 5ff and Porter (1986), p. 17ff.

  2. 2.

    See for example Hayes et al. (2005), p. 143ff and De Meyer and Vereecke (1994), p. 8ff.

  3. 3.

    See for example Schilling and Schwartze (2011), p. 1ff and Liebeck et al. (2008), p. 192ff.

  4. 4.

    See for example Meyer and Jacob (2008), p. 140ff and De Meyer and Vereecke (1994), p. 14f.

  5. 5.

    Schmenner (1982).

  6. 6.

    Erb-Herrmann et al. (2008), p. 5f; Hayes et al. (2005), p. 143ff; Schmenner (1982), p. 77ff.

  7. 7.

    Schmenner (1982), p. 78.

  8. 8.

    Friedli et al. (2011), p. 11f.

  9. 9.

    For the assessment procedure of a certain site, each of the chosen factors is separately evaluated on a scale. An overall value is calculated by multiplying the individual scores. Based on the overall value and/or the individual scores for the most critical factors, sites can be either ranked relatively, or numerical limits can be defined to position the site on the y-axis of the matrix.

  10. 10.

    Hayes et al. (2005), p. 48.

  11. 11.

    Hayes et al. (2005), p. 155.

  12. 12.

    Friedli et al. (2011), p. 11f.

  13. 13.

    Thomas (2013), p. 239ff.

References

  • Christodoulou, P., et al. (2007). Making the right things in the right places – A structured approach to developing and exploiting “manufacturing footprint” strategy. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge, Institute for Manufacturing.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meyer, A., & Vereecke, A. (1994). Strategies for international manufacturing (INSEAD Working Paper Series 94/25/SM/TM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erb-Herrmann, I., et al. (2008). Beyond the blockbuster. Booz Allen Hamilton: Lean Manufacturing and Restructuring Pharma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann, A., & Olhager, J. (2009a). Bundles of site competences in defining plant roles. Working Paper, Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows, K. (1997a). Making the most of foreign factories. Harvard Business Review, 75(2), 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedli, T., et al. (2011). Strategisches Management globaler Produktionsnetzwerke: Erschließung des Netzwerkvorteils. ZWF Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 106(9), 610–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R. H., et al. (2005). Operations, strategy and technology: Pursuing the competitive edge. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebeck, T., Meyer, T., & Abele, E. (2008). Production technology: Adapting to maximize local advantage. In E. Abele et al. (Eds.), Global production. A handbook for strategy and implementation (pp. 192–235). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T., & Jacob, F. (2008). Network design: Optimizing the global production footprint. In E. Abele et al. (Eds.), Global production. A handbook for strategy and implementation (pp. 140–190). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1986). Changing patterns of international competition. California Management Review, 28(2), 9–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, R., & Schwartze, J. (2011). Using manufacturing focus portfolios to assess product mix complexity in manufacturing footprint design. In EurOMA, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmenner, R. W. (1982). Multiplant manufacturing strategies among the fortune 500. Journal of Operations Management, 2(2), 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorten, D., et al. (2006). Taking the right steps: Manufacturing footprint design as a competitive imperative. In Rothfeder, J., & Grenon, G. (eds), Manufacturing realities. Breaking the boundaries of conventional practice (pp. 64–75). Booz Allen Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stremme, U. (2000). Internationales Strategisches Produktionsmanagement. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. (2013). Produktionsnetzwerksysteme. Ein Weg zu effizienten Produktionsnetzwerken. Dissertation, University of St.Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Friedli, T., Mundt, A., Thomas, S. (2014). Network Configuration. In: Strategic Management of Global Manufacturing Networks. Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34185-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics