Advertisement

Abstract

In this paper, we propose to represent a face image as a local descriptor tensor and use a Multilinear Manifold Analysis (MMA) method for discriminant feature extraction, which is used for face recognition. The local descriptor tensor, which is a combination of the descriptor of local regions (K*K-pixel patch) in the image, can represent image more efficient than pixel-level intensity representation, and also than the popular Bag-Of-Feature (BOF) model, which approximately represents each local descriptor as a predefined visual word. Therefore it should be more effective in computational time than the BOF model. For extracting discriminant and compact features from the local descriptor tensor, we propose to use the proposed TMultilinear Manifold Analysis (MMA) algorithm, which has several benefits compared with conventional subspace learning methods such as PCA, ICA, LDA and so on: (1) a natural way of representing data without losing structure information, i.e., the information about the relative positions of pixels or regions; (2) a reduction in the small sample size problem which occurs in conventional supervised learning because the number of training samples is much less than the dimensionality of the feature space; (3) a neighborhood structure preserving in tensor feature space for face recognition and a good convergence property in training procedure. We validate our proposed algorithm on Benchmark database Yale and PIE, and experimental results show recognition rate with the proposed method can be greatly improved compared with conventional subspace analysis methods especially for small training sample number.

Keywords

Face Recognition Recognition Rate Face Image Local Descriptor Locality Preserve Projection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Murase, H., Nayar, S.K.: Visual learning and recognition of 3-d objects from appearance. International Journal of Computer Vision 14(1), 5–24 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turk, M., Pentland, A.: Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3(1), 71–86 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    He, X., Yan, S., Hu, Y., Niyogi, P., Zhang, H.-J.: Face recognition using laplacianfaces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 27(3), 328–340 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, X.-M., Huang, C., Fang, X.-Y., Liu, J.-G.: 2DPCA vs. 2DLDA: Face Recognition Using Two-Dimensional Method. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 357–360 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Csurka, G., Dance, C., Fan, L., Willamowski, J., Bray, C.: Visual categoraization with bags of keypoints. In: Proc. ECCV Workshop on Statistical Learning in Computer Vision, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vasilescu, M.A.O., Terzopoulos, D.: Multilinear Analysis of Image Ensembles: TensorFaces. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002, Part I. LNCS, vol. 2350, pp. 447–460. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sim, T., Baker, S., Bsat, M.: The CMU Pose, Illumination, and Expression (PIE) Database of Human Faces. Robotics Institute, CMU-RI-TR-01-02, Pittsburgh, PA (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lowe, D.: Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision 60(2), 91–110 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cai, D., He, X., Hu, Y., Han, J., Huang, T.: Learning a Spatially Smooth Subspace for Face Recognition. In: CVPR 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cai, D., He, X., Han, J.: Spectral Regression for Efficient Regularized Subspace Learning. In: ICCV 2007 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xian-Hua Han
    • 1
  • Yen-Wei Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.Ritsumeikan UniversityKusatsuJapan

Personalised recommendations