Skip to main content

On the Categorization and Measurability of Enterprise Architecture Benefits with the Enterprise Architecture Value Framework

  • Conference paper
Book cover Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research and Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation (PRET 2012, TEAR 2012)

Abstract

With the development of Enterprise Architecture (EA) as a discipline, measuring and understanding its value for business and IT has become relevant. In this paper a framework for categorizing the benefits of EA, the Enterprise Architecture Value Framework (EAVF), is presented and based on this framework, a measurability maturity scale is introduced.

In the EAVF the value aspects of EA are expressed using the four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard with regard to the development of these aspects over time, defining sixteen key areas in which EA may provide value. In its current form the framework can support architects and researchers in describing and categorizing the benefits of EA.

As part of our ongoing research on the value of EA, two pilots using the framework have been carried out at large financial institutions. These pilots illustrate how to use the EAVF as a tool in measuring the benefits of EA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zachman, J.: A Framework for Information Architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26(3) (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution. Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, P., Ekstedt, M., Silva, E., Plazaola, L.: Using Enterprise Architecture for CIO Decision-making: on the Importance of Theory. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Conference on Systems Engineering Research, CSER (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. IEEE. The IEEE 1471-2000 standard - Architecture Views and Viewpoints. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lange, M., Mendling, J.: An Experts’ Perspective on Enterprise Architecture Goals, Framework Adoption and Benefit Assessment. In: Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), pp. 304–313 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tamm, T., Seddon, P.B., Shanks, G., Reynolds, P.: How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organizations? Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28, Article 10, 141–168 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Townsend, S.: The Value of Enterprise Architecture, part 1 – 6. Series start (2011), http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/22948

  8. van Steenbergen, M., Brinkkemper, S.: Modeling the contribution of enterprise architecture practice to the achievement of business goals. In: Papadopoulos, G.A., Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, W.G., Wrycza, S., Zupancic, J. (eds.) Information Systems Development: Towards a Service Provision Society. Springer, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boucharas, V., van Steenbergen, M., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: The Contribution of Enterprise Architecture to the Achievement of Organizational Goals: Establishing the Enterprise Architecture Benefits Framework.Technical Report UU-CS-2010-014, Utrecht (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slot, R.: A method for valuing Architecture-Based Business Transformation and Measuring the value of Solutions Architecture. PhD Thesis, Utrecht (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van der Raadt, B.: Enterprise Architecture coming of Age. Increasing the Performance of an Emerging Discipline. PhD Thesis, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Foorthuis, R., van Steenbergen, M., Mushkudiani, M., Bruls, W., Brinkkemper, S.: On course but not there yet: Enterprise Architecture Conformance and Benefits in Systems Development. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 110 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schelp, J., Stutz, M.: A Balanced Scorecard Approach to measure the Value of Enterprise Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture 3(1), 5–12 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wideman, M.: Improving PM: Linking Success Criteria to Project Type (2008), http://www.maxwideman.com/papers/improvingpm/intro.html

  15. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems 24(3), 45–78 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pruijt, L., Slot, R., Plessius, H.: The Enterprise Architecture Realization Index. In: Archivalue, Portfolio Management with Enterprise Architecture, Novay, Enschede, pp. 72–81 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bowman, C., Ambrosini, V.: Value Creation Versus Value Capture: Towards a Coherent Definition of Value in Strategy. British Journal of Management 11, 1–15 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–79 (January-February 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management. Accounting Horizons, part I, 87–104 (March), Part II, 147–160 (June) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Norreklit, H.: The balance on the balanced scorecard - a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research 11, 65–88 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. TOGAF. The Open Group Architecture Framework, Version 9.1. TOGAF (2011), http://www3.opengroup.org/

  23. Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods, 2nd edn. Oxford Press Inc., New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Plessius, H., Slot, R.: Valuing Enterprise Architecture. In: Archivalue, Portfolio Management with Enterprise Architecture, Novay, Enschede, pp. 94–99 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kohlegger, M., Maier, R., Thalmann, S.: Understanding Maturity Models Results of a Structured Content Analysis. In: Proceedings of IKNOW 2009 International Conference on Knowledge Management and Knowledge Technologies, pp. 51–61 (September 2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Plessius, H., Slot, R., Pruijt, L. (2012). On the Categorization and Measurability of Enterprise Architecture Benefits with the Enterprise Architecture Value Framework. In: Aier, S., Ekstedt, M., Matthes, F., Proper, E., Sanz, J.L. (eds) Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research and Practice-Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation. PRET TEAR 2012 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 131. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34163-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34163-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34162-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34163-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics