Compass Made Good Correction with MTE
Imprecise and uncertain data dominate in maritime transportation. The Mathematical Theory of Evidence (MTE) [12, 14] extended to a possibilistic platform  enable processing the uncertainty. The Mathematical Theory of Evidence enables upgrading new models and solving crucial problems in many disciplines. The evidence combining scheme as a mechanism enabling enrichment of the initial data information context is useful in many cases. In nautical applications it can be used to make a fix and to evaluate its accuracy. The MTE delivers a new unique opportunity once one engages fuzzy values. Approaches towards a theoretical evaluation of tasks including imprecise data are to be reconsidered. A compass made good correction evaluation is one of such problems. To calculate the correction one has to know the direction towards a landmark or a celestial body. Taking two bearings to landmarks situated at opposite sides is also sufficient. Landmarks situated at counter bearings locations are not available very often.
KeywordsMathematical Theory of Evidence navigation compass made good
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Filipowicz, W.: New Approach towards Position Fixing. Annual of Navigation 16, 41–54 (2010)Google Scholar
- 5.Filipowicz, W.: Belief Structures and their Application in Navigation. Methods of Applied Informatics 3, 53–82 (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Jurdzinski, M.: Principles of Marine Navigation. WAM, Gdynia (2008)Google Scholar
- 9.Liu, W., Hughes, J.G., McTear, M.F.: Representing Heuristic Knowledge and Propagating Beliefs in Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence. In: Federizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J., Yager, R.R. (eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 441–471. John Willey and Sons, Inc., New York (1992)Google Scholar
- 10.Liu, W., Hughes, J.G., McTear, M.F.: Representing Heuristic Knowledge in D-S Theory. In: UAI 1992 Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1992)Google Scholar
- 11.Klir, G.J., Parviz, B.: Probability – Possibility Transformations: a Comparison. International Journal of General Systems 21(1) (1992)Google Scholar
- 13.Rutkowski, L.: Methods and Techniques of the Artificial Intelligence. PWN, Warsaw (2009)Google Scholar