Advertisement

Near-Surface Temperature Measurements

  • Lev EppelbaumEmail author
  • Izzy Kutasov
  • Arkady Pilchin
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences book series (LNESS)

Abstract

Near-surface thermal prospecting is based on temperature measurements in shallow (up to several meters in depth) drill holes. Since geological objects differ in terms of their thermal properties, these temperature measurements provide valuable information about features of the geological targets in the areas under investigation. The developed interpreting system includes: (1) elimination of seasonal variations by using repeated observations with following linear filtering, (2) terrain relief corrections by a correlation technique which facilitates the identification of anomalies associated with ceratin buried features, (3) application for quantitative analysis of thermal anomalies the advanced methodologies developed for magnetic prospecting for conditions of inclined relief, arbitrary magnetization (polarization), and an unknown level of the normal field. Several examples illustrate effective application of quantitative examination of thermal anomalies in ore and oil & gas geophysics, in archaeological and environmental investigations.

Keywords

Temperature Anomaly Salt Dome Temperature Moment Anomalous Body Horizontal Circular Cylinder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Artemenko VI, Malovitsky YP (1977) Results of near-bottom temperature survey at oil and gas deposit Bakhar. Geol Oil Gas 4:50–54 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. Bareyev IA, Wasserman VA, Vishnevsky PV, Verbitsky VA, Elizarov LI, Pomortzev GP, Prihodko AA (1985) The modern level and perspectives of geothermal survey application for nonmetallic deposits. In: Transactions of the 30th international geophysics symposium, Moscow, pp 60–69Google Scholar
  3. Bellerby TJ, Noel M, Branigan K (1990) A thermal method for archaeological prospection: preliminary investigations. Archaeometry 32:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Avraham Z, Ballard D (1984) Near bottom temperature anomalies in the Dead Sea. Earth Planet Sci Lett 71:356–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benner SM, Brodkey RS (1984) Underground detection using differential heat analysis. Archaeometry 26(1):21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackwell DD, Steele JL, Brott CA (1980) The terrain effect on terrestrial heat flow. J Geophys Res 85(B9):4757–4772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogoslovsky VA, Ogilvy AA (1974) Detailed electrometric and thermometric observations in offshore areas. Geophys Prospect 22:381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bogoslovsky VA, Ogilvy AA (1977) Geophysical methods for the investigation of landslides. Geophysics 42(3):562–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borisovich VT, Eppelbaum VM, Ginzburg SN (1988) Optimization of geophysical investigations in mountainous regions on the basis of integration of geophysical and mining-drilling works. In: Borisovich VT, Eppelbaum VM (eds) Optimization of ore exploration in mountainous regions. Nedra, Moscow, pp 123–133 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Brivio PA, Pepe M, Tomasoni R (2000) Multispectral and multiscale remote sensing data for archaeological prospecting in an alpine alluvial plain. J Cultural Heritage 1:155–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brodovoi VV, Ginzburg SN, Leont’ev YV, Shafarenko VA (1988) In: Brodovoi VV (ed) Borehole and mining geophysics, vol 2, Chapter XVI: Regional Investigations and Geomapping, Nedra, Moscow, pp 343–352 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  12. Bullard EC (1940) The disturbance of the temperature gradient in the Earth’s crust by inequalities of height. Month Not Roy Astr Soc Geophys 4:300–362Google Scholar
  13. Carslow HS, Jaeger JC (1959) Conduction of heat in solids, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Chekalyuk EB, Fedortzev IM, Osadchy VG (1974) Geothermal field survey. Naukova Dumka, Kiev (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. Cheremensky GA (1977) Applied geothermics. Nedra, Leningrad (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. Dobrynina ZK, Dmitrieva TA, Pletnev AA, Semenov VG, Skornyakov SM (1985) Shaping of seasonal thermal anomalies over ore bodies. Izvestiya VUZOV Ser Geol Prospect 8:98–101 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  17. Eppelbaum LV (1989) The development of methods for processing and interpretation of natural geophysical fields in prospecting for pyrite ores under mountainous conditions. Ph.D Thesis, Institute of Geophysics (Georgian Acad. of Sciences), Tbilisi, 1989 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  18. Eppelbaum LV (1999) Near-surface thermal prospecting in petroleum geology. In: Kutasov MI (ed) Applied geothermics for petroleum engineers. Elsevier, London, pp 274–301Google Scholar
  19. Eppelbaum LV (2000) Applicability of geophysical methods for localization of archaeological targets: an introduction. Geoinformatics 11(1):19–28Google Scholar
  20. Eppelbaum LV (2007) Revealing of subterranean karst using modern analysis of potential and quasi-potential fields. In: Proceedings of the 2007 SAGEEP conference, vol 20, Denver, USA, pp 797–810Google Scholar
  21. Eppelbaum LV (2009) Near-surface temperature survey: an independent tool for buried archaeological targets delineation. J Cultural Heritage 12(Suppl 1):e93–e103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eppelbaum LV (2010) Archaeological geophysics in Israel: past, present and future. Adv Geosci 24:45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eppelbaum LV (2013) Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to archaeological and environmental targets classified as “quasi thick bed bodies” in complex physical-geological environments. In: Proceedings of the 2013 SAGEEP conference, vol 26(1), Denver, Colorado, USA, pp 415–424Google Scholar
  24. Eppelbaum LV, Khesin BE (2012) Geophysical studies in the Caucasus. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eppelbaum LV, Mishne LR (1987) Quantitative calculation of seasonal temperature variations in near-surface thermal prospecting. In: Transactions of the all-union conference on means for improving the effectiveness of geophysical methods, Moscow, USSR, p 54 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  26. Eppelbaum LV, Mishne LR (1988) Some theoretical aspects of optimal filtration of geophysical signals with dependent noises. Deposited by VINITI, USSR Academy of Science, No. 6034-B88, pp 1–10 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  27. Eppelbaum LV, Modelevsky MM, Pilchin AN (1996) Geothermal investigations in the Dead Sea Rift zone, Israel: implications for petroleum geology. J Petrol Geol 19(4):425–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ginzburg S, et al (1974) Integrated geophysical investigations in ore deposits of in Georgia (southern slope of the Greater Caucasus). Unpublished Report of TzNIGRI (Central Scientific Institution of Non-Ferrous and Precious Metals), Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  29. Ginzburg SN, Maslennikov AL (1989) Gravity prospecting. In: Brodovoi VV (ed) Borehole and mining geophysics, vol 2. Nedra, Moscow, pp 258–263 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. Horai K, Simmons G (1969) Thermal conductivity of rock-forming minerals. Earth Planetary Sci Lett 6:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hutchins JS, Kading H (1969) How to interpret temperature surveys. Oil Gas J 1:96–103, 2:137–141Google Scholar
  32. Kappelmeyer O (1957) The use of near-surface temperature measurements for discovering anomalies due to causes at depths. Geophys Prospect 5:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kappelmeyer O, Hänel R (1974) Geothermics with special reference to application. Gebruder Borntrargen, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Khesin BE (1978) Calculation of terrain relief influence in magnetic prospecting. Appl Geophys 83:102–111 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  35. Khesin BE, Eppelbaum LV (1994) Near-surface thermal prospecting: review of processing and interpretation. Geophysics 59(5):744–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Khesin BE, Alexeyev VV, Eppelbaum LV (1996) Interpretation of geophysical fields in complicated environments., Modern approaches in geophysics.Kluwer Academic Publishers (Springer), BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khutorsky MD, Salnikov VE, Fotogdinov RA (1983) Geothermal prospecting of ore deposits. In: Kropotkin BM, Smirnov YB (eds) Methodical and experimental principles of geothermometry. Nauka, Moscow, pp 212–229 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  38. Kumar P, Kaleita AL (2003) Assimilation of near-surface temperature using extended Kalman filter. Adv Water Resour 26:79–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lachenbruch AN (1968) Rapid estimation of the topographic disturbance to superficial thermal gradients. Rev Geophys 6(3):365–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lakhtionov MO, Tarkhov AG (1967) Experience in thermal prospecting at pyrite deposits of the Urals. Izvestiya VUZOV, Ser Geol Prospect 5:87–94 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  41. Lasky BH (1967) Earth heat flow criteria may indicate porosity traps. World Oil 164(5):92–99Google Scholar
  42. Leschak HA, Lewis JE (1983) Geothermal prospecting with shallow-temperature surveys. Geophysics 48(7):975–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lubimova EA (1968) Thermics of the earth and moon. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  44. Mongelli F, Morelli C (1961) Contributi alla prospezione geotermica. Boll Geofis Teor Applic 3:294–306Google Scholar
  45. Moscicki WJ (1987) Temperature anomalies over underground cavities. Geophys Prospect 35:393–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Niethammer G (1910) Die Warmeverteilung in Simplon. Eclogae Geol Helv 73:96–120Google Scholar
  47. Noel M, Bellerby TJ (1990) Thermal archaeological surveying: a recording soil temperature probe. Archaoemetry 32(1):83–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oelsner C (1998) Integrated interpretation of direct and indirect (geoelectrical) temperature data. In: Proceedings of the international conference on the earth’s thermal field and related research methods, Moscow, Russia, pp 187–191Google Scholar
  49. Parasnis DS (1971) Temperature extrapolation to infinite time in geothermal measurements. Geophys Prospect 19:612–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Paul M (1935) Uber Messingew der erdbodentemperatur and salzodomen. Z Geophys 11(7/8):388–392Google Scholar
  51. Périsset MC, Tabbagh A (1981) Interpretation of thermal prospection on bare soils. Archaeometry 23(2):169–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Poley JP, Steveninck JV (1970) Delineation of shallow salt domes and surface faults by temperature measurements at a depth of approximately 2 meters. Geophys Prospect 18:666–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ravnik D, Rajver D (1998) The use of inverse geotherms for determining underground water flow at the Ombla karst spring near Dubrovnik, Croatia. J Appl Geophys 39:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodionov PF, Sofronov NI (1935) On the possibility of an application of thermal prospecting to search for sulphide deposits. Probl Sov Geol 8:257–268 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  55. Rybach L (1995) Thermal waters in deep Alpine tunnels. Geothermics 24:631–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Selig F, Wallick GC (1966) Temperature distribution in salt domes and surrounding sediments. Geophysics 31:346–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smerdon JE, Pollack HN, Cermak V, Enz JW, Kresl M, Safanda J, Wehmiller JF (2004) Air-ground temperature coupling and subsurface propagation of annual temperature signals. J Geophys Res 109:1–10. doi: 10.1029/2004JD005056 Google Scholar
  58. Sudzhadinov RA, Kosmodemyansky VV (1986) Mapping for oil and gas structures at large depth. In: Ismail-Zade TA (ed) Combined interpretation of geological–geophysical materials for investigating the structure and prospecting for oil and gas at large depth. YuzhVNIIGeofizika, Baku, pp 94–103 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  59. Suryaninov EYu, Vishnevsky PV, Vasserman VA (1983) Investigation of geothermal anomaly behavior over geological objects with contrasting thermal conductivity. Izvestiya Acad Sci USSR Ser Phys Earth 12:96–102Google Scholar
  60. Tabbagh A (1973) Essai sur les conditions d’application des measures thermiques á la prospection archeologique. Ann Geophys 29(2):179–188Google Scholar
  61. Tikhonov AN, Samarsky AA (1963) Equations of mathematical physics. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  62. van den Bouwhuysen JNA (1934) The thermocouple proves useful on a geophysical survey. Eng Min J 135:342–344Google Scholar
  63. Zverev VP, Dolnikov VA, Khutorsky MD, Fotogdinov RA (1982) Thermal effect and sulphide oxidation rate in the Katekh deposit (as applied to the southern slope of the Greater Caucasus). Doklady USSR Acad Sci 265(4):960–962Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geophysics, Atmospheric and Planetary SciencesTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.BYG Consulting Co.BostonUSA
  3. 3.Universal Geoscience and Environment Consulting CompanyWillowdaleCanada

Personalised recommendations