Skip to main content

ONSET: Automated Foundational Ontology Selection and Explanation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7603))

Abstract

It has been shown that using a foundational ontology for domain ontology development is beneficial in theory and practice. However, developers have difficulty with choosing the appropriate foundational ontology, and why. In order to solve this problem, a comprehensive set of criteria that influence foundational ontology selection has been compiled and the values for each parameter determined for DOLCE, BFO, GFO, and SUMO. This paper-based analysis is transformed into an easily extensible algorithm and implemented in the novel tool ONSET, which helps a domain ontology developer to choose a foundational ontology through interactive selection of preferences and scaling of importance so that it computes the most suitable foundational ontology for the domain ontology and explains why this selection was made. This has been evaluated in an experiment with novice modellers, which showed that ONSET greatly assists in foundational ontology selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keet, C.M.: The Use of Foundational Ontologies in Ontology Development: An Empirical Assessment. In: Antoniou, G., Grobelnik, M., Simperl, E., Parsia, B., Plexousakis, D., De Leenheer, P., Pan, J. (eds.) ESWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6643, pp. 321–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgo, S., Lesmo, L.: The attractiveness of foundational ontologies in industry. In: Proc. of FOMI 2008, pp. 1–9. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: Ontology library. WonderWeb Deliverable D18 (2003) (ver. 1.0, December 31, 2003), http://wonderweb.semanticweb.org

  4. Herre, H.: General Formal Ontology (GFO): A foundational ontology for conceptual modelling. In: Poli, R., Healy, M., Kameas, A. (eds.) Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, pp. 297–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Niles, I., Pease, A.: Towards a standard upper ontology. In: Proc. of FOIS 2001, October 17-19. IOS Press, Ogunquit (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kassel, G.: Integration of the DOLCE top-level ontology into the OntoSpec methodology. Technical Report HAL: hal-00012203/arXiv: cs.AI/0510050, Laboratoire de Recherche en Informatique d’Amiens (LaRIA) (October 2005), http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ccsd-00012203

  7. Grenon, P., Smith, B., Goldberg, L.: Biodynamic ontology: Applying BFO in the biomedical domain. In: Stud. Health Technol. Inform., pp. 20–38. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ermolayev, V., Keberle, N., Matzke, W.-E.: An Upper Level Ontological Model for Engineering Design Performance Domain. In: Li, Q., Spaccapietra, S., Yu, E., Olivé, A. (eds.) ER 2008. LNCS, vol. 5231, pp. 98–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Oberle, D.: Semantic Management of Middleware. Semantic Web and Beyond, vol. 1. Springer, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jonquet, C., Musen, M.A., Shah, N.H.: Building a biomedical ontology recommender web service. Journal of Biomedical Semantics 1(suppl. 1), S1 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martínez-Romero, M., Vázquez-Naya, J.M., Pereira, J., Pazos, A.: A Multi-criteria Approach for Automatic Ontology Recommendation Using Collective Knowledge. In: Pazos Arias, J.J., Fernández Vilas, A., Díaz Redondo, R.P. (eds.) Recommender Systems for the Social Web. ISRL, vol. 32, pp. 89–104. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, X., Guo, L., Fang, J.: Automated ontology selection based on description logic. In: Proc. of CSCWD 2008, April 16-18, pp. 482–487. IEEE Computer Society, Xi’an (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mascardi, V., Cordí, V., Rosso, P.: A comparison of upper ontologies. Technical Report DISI-TR-06-21, University of Genova, Italy, pp. 55–64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jureta, I.J., Mylopoulos, J., Faulkner, S.: A core ontology for requirements. Applied Ontology 4(3-4), 169–244 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Semy, S.K., Pulvermacher, M.K., Obrst, L.J.: Toward the use of an upper ontology for us government and us military domains: An evaluation. Technical Report MTR 04B0000063. The MITRE Corporation (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Keet, C.M.: Transforming semi-structured life science diagrams into meaningful domain ontologies with DiDOn. J. of Biomedical Informatics 45(3), 482–494 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoehndorf, R., Prüfer, K., Backhaus, M., Visagie, J., Kelso, J.: The design of a wiki-based curation system for the ontology of functions. In: Proc. of the Joint BioLINK and 9th Bio-Ontologies Meeting, Fortaleza, Brazil, August 5 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smith, B., et al.: The OBO Foundry: Coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nature Biotechnology 25(11), 1251–1255 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad, F., Lindgren, H.: Selection of Foundational Ontology for Collaborative Knowledge Modeling in Healthcare Domain. In: Dicheva, D., Dochev, D. (eds.) AIMSA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6304, pp. 261–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Keet, C.M.: Factors Affecting Ontology Development in Ecology. In: Ludäscher, B., Raschid, L. (eds.) DILS 2005. LNCS (LNBI), vol. 3615, pp. 46–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Sinha, G., Mark, D.: Toward a foundational ontology of the landscape. In: Proc. of GIScience 2010, Zürich, Switzerland, September 14-17 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fernández-López, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C.: Selecting and customizing a mereology ontology for its reuse in a pharmaceutical product ontology. In: Eschenbach, C., Grüninger, M. (eds.) Proc. of FOIS 2008, pp. 181–194. IOS Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khan, Z., Keet, C.M. (2012). ONSET: Automated Foundational Ontology Selection and Explanation. In: ten Teije, A., et al. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. EKAW 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7603. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33875-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33876-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics